Ok, so I have a couple of questions... Help me to understand your use of the term "True hypo". If hypo-melanism is a trait characterized by a noted reduction in black pigmentation then any snake with a heritable (in this case simple recessive), reduction of black pigment relative to the wildtype would be considered "hypo-melanistic" aka hypo, right? (Not to be confused with faded colors of some locality populations of sayi and affinis.) What am I missing? What condition constitutes a so called "true" hypo? Is this a pet trade/breeder devised standard? Or is there an actual genetically "true" hypo condition?
I tend to use the term hypo-melanistic with its actual latin literal meaning....
hypo=meaning reduced, and melanism/melanin= describing the black pigmentation.
If the Stillwater line is not a "true" hypo then what is the correct label that should be placed on this phenotype?
Thanks in advance for any enlightenment anyone can shed on the topic
check out the reduced amount of black pigment on the snake below... hypo-melanistic?
