My cousins (and I -- I'll admit it) have caught and eaten snappers for the last forty years by the simple method of lying down in the water and feeling for them under overhanging banks, muskrat burrows, logjams, etc. [This is in Wisconsin, where we have no copperheads or cottonmouths; dunno if I'd try it in the South.] Literally hundreds of trips and thousands of turtles over the years, and only once was someone bitten by a snapper IN THE WATER, and that was because my Uncle Ted (73 at the time) was getting too stiff to hunt turtles, so he was poking for them with a silage fork. When Cousin Fritz grabbed the one Ted found, it was understandably upset. Once they've been pulled out they get nasty, but not underwater. [We'd pull by grabbing the shell, rear legs, or tail. Remember, these were being gathered to eat, so the hunters were not as gentle as you'd be for a catch-and-release photo op.] The first time I was taken along, I had to see it done before I was convinced my cousins were not pulling a cruel trick on me. The first one I caught, I made first contact by touching him with my thumb under his chin, middle finger on top of his head, and index finger in his mouth. He never bit down! In the hope of stopping at least some of the abuse I'm gonna get, I'll say that these were all farm boys, who were used to harvesting wild game, and were very careful not to overhunt an area. Much as I hate the cruelty and sensationalism of rattlesnake roundups, it's hard to show solid evidence that they are reducing the population, any more than deer hunting does. Hunting *will* select out the older, larger, more genetically desirable specimens. Perhaps that's enough reason to oppose it. Anyway, we have legal closed seasons and bag limits on snappers now, so Wisconsin turtle hunting is officially considered to be not an absolute evil.
MiserMike