Reptile & Amphibian Forums

Welcome to kingsnake.com's message board system. Here you may share and discuss information with others about your favorite reptile and amphibian related topics such as care and feeding, caging requirements, permits and licenses, and more. Launched in 1997, the kingsnake.com message board system is one of the oldest and largest systems on the internet.

Click here to visit Classifieds
Click for 65% off Shipping with Reptiles 2 You
Click here for Dragon Serpents

superpastel???

PietNuijten Jul 23, 2009 11:39 AM

A few days ago wenn I open the eggs I was very suprised.
From three egss from a normal ballpython female to a superpastel male there was one baby who looks like a superpastel.
Have someone else the same experience?

Piet and Monika Nuijten
www.albinoblackheadpython.com

Image

Replies (16)

Bolitochrome Jul 23, 2009 11:53 AM

Wow, I don't know if that is a superpastel. Maybe a hidden gene in your "normal"?
-----
3.4 ball pythons
1.1 kingsnakes
0.1 crazy cat
?!.?! ASFs
1.0 husband

zefdin Jul 23, 2009 02:29 PM

The pattern looks extremely reduced. You may have something very nice and totally unexpected on your hands. Good for you! Please post more pics when the baby comes out. Also, post pics of the mother & clutch mates if you can.

~np!

BrucenBruce Jul 23, 2009 06:19 PM

That doesn't look like any super pastel I can recall seeing.

That doesn't look like any other ball python I can recall seeing.

I don't know what it is. I think you might just have to tell us all - when you name it!

Congratulations on hatching a really pretty little snake!

~Bruce

alexestrada Jul 23, 2009 07:07 PM

well when you breed a super pastel to a normal...i believe babies should be pastels, super pastels, and normals...i dont quite remember and to lazy to look it up..

rkreptiles Jul 23, 2009 07:18 PM

When a superpastel is bred to a normal all the babies should be pastel. No supers or normals.
-----

usark.org/join.php

....I would rather have a Bottle in front of me.....than a Frontal Lobotomy....

Rob Trenor
RK Reptiles
www.rkreptiles.com
www.rkreptiles.net
www.ballpythonmorphs.net

_____

Mahlon Jul 23, 2009 07:18 PM

Super Pastel X Normal = SHOULD be all Pastels, NO normals, NO Super pastels.

With that said there are a few things that could be at work here:

1) You have another gene influencing the phenotype of your "pastel" that is an Allele to pastel. (Think Crystal Ball, Superstripe, and any of the white snake complex snakes like a Lesser Mojave Leucy)

2) You have another gene influencing the phenotype of your "pastel" that is not an allele (Think Bumblebee x normal = pastels, spiders, normals, and Bumblebees)

3) That during recombination/segregation the "normal" allele was lost/discarded and the pastel allele was cloned to replace it, leaving you with a homozygous animal, where you should only have hets. This is the least likely of the three (though it does happen, if you look at Ralph Davis' breeding records from last year or the year before, he got a clown out of a clutch that should have only produced hets if i recall correctly).

Irregardless of which one, beautiful animal and can't wait to see more pics and congrats :D

ohernz Jul 24, 2009 05:44 AM

Super pastel x normal should get 100% pastel. That baby looks real nice (whatever it is) hope to see more pics soon
-----
Neutiquam erro. Hostes alienigeni me abduxerunt.

Quality_Snakes Jul 24, 2009 03:45 AM

Hello Piet,
I had a super out of a pastel X normal breeding a couple years ago


-----
www.qualitysnakes.it

PietNuijten Jul 24, 2009 10:19 AM

Thanks for all this response.
Here some pictures from the mother and I think I must wait and the time will tell us if this is a new morph or not.
I'm voor 300% sure the female is not a ugly pastel!!!

Image

PietNuijten Jul 24, 2009 10:20 AM

Here also a pictures from the three baby's.

Image

PietNuijten Jul 24, 2009 10:21 AM

Here another picture.
Image

Quality_Snakes Jul 24, 2009 10:26 AM

it's possible, although very rare that the developing embryo for some reason lacks the normal allele of the "morph" gene so the mutated one dupicates itself.
a couple months ago a guy had a supermojave form mojave X normal breeding
-----
www.qualitysnakes.it

giantkeeper Jul 24, 2009 02:21 PM

Forgive me if you answered this already, or addressed it in your original post.

Was this female a virgin? If not what had you bred her to previously?
-----
Chris & Alliey
www.bloodyleopard.com
E-mail Us

Watever Jul 24, 2009 03:02 PM

May be just a pastel ?

I remember a thread from Corey Woods ( I think last year) where he was trying to get the Super Pastel Red Axanthic.

There was a super pastel that was either het red or red. But there was another dead one, that got him confused. He was way lighter than the other one. So it was either a super pastel red and the other one a super pastel het red, or they were both super pastel red. But the dead babies didn't color up all the way.

That's what it looks like. May be something in the development of this baby make it lighter.

Well, he is nothing more than a ball python
And you gonna have to test different stuff if you want to prove something here.
-----
love this world, don't hate it.

zefdin Jul 24, 2009 10:33 AM

This is whats great about this hobby still today. You dont neccesarily have to spend tons of money and have a 3 thousand snake collection to breed something totally cool and really exciting. That is whats awesome to me! You never, ever know what you are going to hatch. While very rare, it still can happen to you too from a male snake that looks cool and you pay $50 and breed it to your normal female..you never, ever know.

illbeyoursoldier Jul 25, 2009 09:18 AM

Whatever mutation you just threw with that pairing, it seems to be touching in the other two babies as well. Especially the baby all the way to the right in those photos. It's head seems super light compared to the rest of it's body color to me... or maybe its just my eyes, I could be wrong.
-----
Cheers!
• Chelsea Lynn Gardiner
(and Frank M. Wood)

Site Tools