Reptile & Amphibian Forums

Welcome to kingsnake.com's message board system. Here you may share and discuss information with others about your favorite reptile and amphibian related topics such as care and feeding, caging requirements, permits and licenses, and more. Launched in 1997, the kingsnake.com message board system is one of the oldest and largest systems on the internet.

Click here for Dragon Serpents
Click for ZooMed
Click for 65% off Shipping with Reptiles 2 You

Snake Lobby, Animal Groups Clash Over Py

EricWI Aug 16, 2009 07:29 PM

The exotic pet industry is feeling the squeeze from Florida lawmakers and animal welfare groups seeking to ban the importation of pythons into the United States.

The industry’s lobbyists are scrambling to win changes to legislation advancing in the House and Senate that would add pythons to a federal list of “injurious” species — a designation that would bar future imports and interstate transport.

The bills, sponsored by Sen. Bill Nelson (D-Fla.) and Rep. Kendrick Meek (D-Fla.), take aim at the tens of thousands of Burmese pythons that have invaded the Florida Everglades in recent years. The snakes, which can measure 25 feet in length and weigh as much as 250 pounds, are thought by some to have escaped from pet shops during Hurricane Andrew in 1992. They’ve since flourished, wreaking havoc with the delicate Everglades ecosystem and raising public safety concerns.

“Lord forbid, a visitor in the Everglades ever encounters one,” Nelson wrote to Interior Secretary Ken Salazar in July. The fears were exacerbated when a 12-foot pet albino Burmese python escaped its aquarium and suffocated a central Florida toddler last month.

But industry officials say the bills overreach while doing nothing about the Everglades infestation.

“An import ban does not address the real issue,” said Marshall Meyers, CEO and general counsel of the Pet Industry Joint Advisory Council, which says federal efforts should mirror stringent state regulations for large reptiles.

With anti-python momentum growing, PIJAC and the United States Association of Reptile Keepers are working behind the scenes to soften the blow of the bill before it comes to the House floor after the August recess.

During last month’s House Judiciary Committee markup, the groups were successful in adding language to the bill (H.R. 2811) that restricts the ban to two species: the Burmese and African Rock pythons. That allows the continued importation and sale of the Ball python, a smaller African species that is “by far the most popular within the pet trade,” Meyers said.

But animal welfare groups want the scope of the bills broadened, not narrowed. Beth Preiss, director of the Exotic Pets Campaign of the Humane Society of the United States, said the limited ban in the amended House bill will lead to increased imports of other large constrictor snakes including reticulated pythons and anacondas — both of which have reproductive habits similar to the Burmese python and grow even bigger.

The two sides are also at odds over how the bill should apply to the tens of thousands of existing snakes that would be covered under the law. Species labeled injurious under the federal Lacey Act, which regulates wildlife commerce, are prohibited from interstate transport.

That could be a fatal strike for snake breeders, who want a grandfather clause added to the bill that would allow interstate sales to continue. “The way the bills are written now, they would essentially destroy a $3 billion a year captive/bred industry,” said USARK President Andrew Wyatt, who noted that a single snake can fetch as much as $10,000.

The transport issue could also raise complications for owners who relocate to a new state. “Some people may just turn them loose,” Meyers said.

But opponents said any sort of grandfather clause would undercut the intent of the bill. “That’s really just ludicrous if you think about it,” said Peter Jenkins, the director of international conservation for Defenders of Wildlife. “These species will invade whether they’ve been captive, bred or imported. They’re still the same animal.”

Regardless, a House Democratic staffer suggested the bill is unlikely to see major revisions before the floor, saying the changes sought by both sides would likely threaten its chances of passage. That leaves the best prospects for changes in the Senate, where the Environment and Public Works Committee is expected to mark up the bill later this year.

Nelson spokesman Bryan Gulley said the Senator is listening to interest groups’ concerns about the bill and willing to entertain changes to improve it. “The bottom line is we’ve got to get the python problem under control,” he said.
http://www.rollcall.com/news/37790-1.html

Replies (8)

jscrick Aug 16, 2009 08:38 PM

Regarding this article -- some of the facts are correct and some are obviously incorrect.
Not real sure what the point of the article is/was, other than to spread misinformation and add to the confusion.
Who wrote that?
jsc
-----
"As hard as I've tried, just can't NOT do this"
John Crickmer

Jaykis Aug 17, 2009 11:22 AM

95% of all the animals imported are fish and coral. Tropical fish are already taking over a lot of territory that native fish had in the glades.

Let's do some more giant snakehead fish stories.....say they're breeding with flying fish. THAT should move the heat off snakes.

natsamjosh Aug 17, 2009 11:48 AM

>>95% of all the animals imported are fish and coral. Tropical fish are already taking over a lot of territory that native fish had in the glades.
>>
>> Let's do some more giant snakehead fish stories.....say they're breeding with flying fish. THAT should move the heat off >snakes.

I found this article a few weeks ago. Talk about irony!

http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/02/10/florida-invasive-fish-problem-10-times-worse-than-the-python/

webwheeler Aug 17, 2009 03:21 PM

This is just my opinion, which may prove to be controversial.

I don't believe it's good idea to alienate potential supporters of our position by pointing fingers, saying (dogs, cats, birds, tropical fish, etc.) are worse than snakes. It may be true, or not, but we shouldn't be using that as an argument in our defence. It makes us look bad and further supports the animal rights position to ban all pets.

aquick Aug 18, 2009 07:12 AM

Wheeler, I completely agree with you. We should never throw other pet owners under the bus. All pet owners are in this fight together, and we should stick together. (even if we completely disagree with the way many marine animals are harvested for the pet trade). For instance, primate people are in a worse position than we are (anti-primate bill passed the House). One group of animals at a time--that is how they want to dismantle the pet industry. If one segment loses, we all lose.

Jaykis Aug 18, 2009 12:01 PM

The snakehead analogy was made as a joke, actually. Witness the movies about them. My percentage was given to show the actual ratio of fish and coral to other animals being imported.

wstreps Aug 19, 2009 07:36 AM

At one point Ben Siegel held the world record for the largest snakehead caught on rod and reel.

Ernie Eison
WESTWOOD ACRES REPTILE FARM INC.

Jaykis Aug 26, 2009 07:00 PM

I think someone should make a flying fish/snakehead hybrid.

THAT will get someone's attention.

Site Tools