lets get some thangs straight mr.mong...
>>>I am also entitled to my opinion too, and I say it's the other way around, and that YOU are the freak!. I've noticed that you constantly try to discredit anyone that makes an attempt to keep bloodlines more genuine, or "pure", or whatever you choose to call it.
>first thanks means alot comin from you, now who have i tried to DISCREDIT ,WHO doug?!?!? ive never tried to discredit anyone and you are completely WRONG to state that i have.
>>>All of the getula complex(or any other) is not the same thing, and it never WILL be either dude. On the other side of the coin however, the more people there are that share your same views that you do(hopefully not too many), and will breed anything to anything then sell them, the more those getula and all their offspring will be more the same, because all the offspring would contain very similar genes from being so mixed up together. So I guess you could safely say lots of YOUR stuff is basically the same thing, but that doesn't mean that everyone elses snakes are, or has to be.
>kinda like gettin an animal and saying its pure to market a morph regardless of KNOWN history is that what your sayin? because all getula are the same. mixing them is whats done in captivity, in nature they are the same the patterns you see are simple adaptations to their environments/niche but make no mistake they are the same and this is why science classifies them as GETULA. now ya wanna try and down my animals that shows your real problem see i have "pures", but i also have mixes that i do for my enjoyment YOU seem threatened by that, relax, i dont think that everyone elses snakes are, or has to be crosses. but quite frankly MOST in hobby are. do you remember in the 80's when amel calkings hit the hobby? and within 5 years what do ya know amels are/were popping out of ALL the getula ssp. do you actually feel that was natural? and what about backbreeding, linebreeding,etc. ya wanna talk about that douggy? or are you one of the pee and beer puritans? that actually mistakenly beleive that all ssp. are actual PURE animals and crossing them is as different as pee&beer. the said animal in this post has NO HISTORY! is it ok to tout it as pure holbrooki ssp? and if it is ok how and why?
>>>and to also use one of your favorite little cute phrases that you always like to add, how about............DAMN THE MUTT MIXERS!!!!!
>cute lil phrases huh? maybe if you try REAL hard you will be able to come up with one of your own, but then again maybe not.
>>>Why would anyone with even a small amount of rational thought always be trying to bash others for keeping lines more genuine to their subspecies, this baffles the heck out of me bro.
>well BRO (lmao) i aint BASHING nobody's line the said snake has no history other than it looked like an amel holbrooki as a baby that alone is not grounds to say look its a new morph of holbrooki and its pure! come'on get real you know as well as i its not that simple. and FYI i encourage others especially newbies to keep lines true so baffle away on my rational doug, all the while callin me bro.
>>>So yeah,I'll say it again.....DAMN THE MUTT MIXERS!!!!, and congratulations to all the so-called "splitters" and "purists" out there!!!!.
>keep workin on it there doug maybe oneday...
>>>I think it is pretty weird that this seems to bother you so much.
>we are all weird in our own weird way
,,,,,,,,,,,thomas davis
-----
Morphs... just like baseball cards BUT ALIVE, how cool is that???
my website www.barmollysplace.com