Reptile & Amphibian Forums

Welcome to kingsnake.com's message board system. Here you may share and discuss information with others about your favorite reptile and amphibian related topics such as care and feeding, caging requirements, permits and licenses, and more. Launched in 1997, the kingsnake.com message board system is one of the oldest and largest systems on the internet.

Click for 65% off Shipping with Reptiles 2 You
Click for ZooMed
Click for 65% off Shipping with Reptiles 2 You

Snake lineage

Ric Blair Nov 22, 2009 02:41 PM

THIS IS FOR ALL THE NEW GUYS ON THE SCENE AND THE FINGER POINTERS. Just as today. Many people are not posting their finds, as they have to lie about how or where it they collected them, if they want to post it at all. If they say they caught the snakes on a certain cut, then they are admitting to breaking the law. So if you are collecting illegaly then you really cannot say where you caught the snake, unless you are an idiot. Besides you would be admitting that you were dishonest if you did. I know that a lot of snakes are being caught illegally, I hear it from a lot of people, and I have seen it posted on the internet. I am sure that law enforcement has the info. also. The word gets aroung very quickly. So for those of you who doubt everybody, lets see you give the true collecting data and post it on the forum, or sell it with the chance of being caught on down the road. You do not have to get caught with the snake in your hand to be guilty. If you cannot give the exact collecting data then the snake is worthless according to some of you.

Not to long ago, and for a very long time it was illegal to collect alterna, subocs and many other herps. There were some pretty stiff fines imposed for collecting the animals. I know a lot of people that were busted back then. So it was all driven underground, just as it appears to be that way now. All the dealings were done with friends, and everyone was very worried about every new face that came along back then. There were undercover agents collecting amongst the herpers, and getting information. There were many people that were scared of me at the time, they thought I was undercover. Everyone was suspected. Many a snake was sold with the verbage included in the negotiations, do not tell where you got the snakes from or any other incriminating information. So alot of the information was not written on cards. It was kept in the heads of the collectors. The babies were sold on and passed on down the same way without papers. The last thing that a herper wanted was to have his collection raided, the snakes confiscated, hiring high paid lawyers, and fines for lacey act violations, and what not. It is a violation if you collect them now off a roadside cut and take them across State lines. Plus the chance that you could incriminate someone else with the data if you bought the snakes or offsping from those snakes. So you guys be happy that you have been able to do that. You cannot do it now. So any little club that starts up with preferred honest localities. Take it as having been a good opportunity. Because if you sell the snakes now with the true locality you are in trouble. So you cannot, as before rely on any data put on new finds to be reliable.

It is very very different for some of you new guy's on the scene over the last 10 years. Dan Johnson would not have been able to give his collection data back then, nor now. You could be more open over the last 10 years or so as it was not against the law. So this new keeping of data, is just a recent thing in terms of my life collecting alterna. It was illegal back then and it is illegal now. Unless you lie. For those of you that have posted pictures, and then keep the data, Then secretly tell where the snake was really caught, to a buyer or interested party, it could get busted at any time. Law enforcement keeps this data for sometimes many years before they act. They try to pull as many people as they can into the web before pouncing. I have seen it happen many times. Time plays a trick on memomory as evidenced in many posts. Example is I cannot remember if it was two boys, and then another post they thought it was a boy and a girl. The poiont is they remember the snakes just not all the details. It does not mean they were lying. So there were some good years for keeping data. But if you are walking the cuts on boyscout road, or shining the cuts and catch a snake anywhere. You either lie or you just can't report the exact locality. Just keep collecting and keep talking. You will be incredibly unhappy when Law enforcement comes banging on your door, and you have all the collection data there to incriminate yourself.

So we know some of your guys entire collections now, as you guys that like to boast have displayed all you have collected. When we see a new one that was collected, one can easilly assume it was caught illegaly, are willing to give the collection data? Just for thought.. Ric Blair

Replies (17)

rpelaez Nov 22, 2009 03:37 PM

They can be for Ric, or for anyone else that knows the answers.

1) When did TPWD lift the ban off the collection of Lampropeltis alterna in the 80's? Please give the effective date.

2) When in 2007 did TPWD consider it illegal to collect from public roads and right of ways. Please give the effective date.

Just want this clarified. Thanks.

Robert

bobassetto Nov 22, 2009 04:04 PM

1977 to 1987??...alterna etc protected, but you could hunt the ROW.....2 years ago the infamous ROW law.....can't walk on the ROW to collect vertebrates???....WTF...THIS LAW BLOWS...

Ric Blair Nov 22, 2009 04:16 PM

Bob, That sounds about right on the time I was there. I think I first went there in 1975 or 76 and it was illegal then, I thought it was in effect much longer then 10 years. Someone else will have to weigh in on that. Ric

Joe Forks Nov 22, 2009 05:22 PM

I know this one because it was my birthday, July 18th 1977 and it lasted until sometime in 1987.
-----
Herp Conservation Unlimited
Conservation through captive propagation
Mexicana Group Directory
Photography by Joseph E. Forks

Ric Blair Nov 22, 2009 07:11 PM

Hi Joe,
You know that the majority of the hunters do not have private roads to hunt on. They do not even know where to go and who to ask. So the problem I can foresee is people changing their road cut animals to private property animals. So for those of you trying to pair up exact cut animals it could represent a problem. You are now going to have to hunt on private property and keep hunting that same acre, LOL. Another thing I have noticed is that after the ban on the snakes, the pressure seemed to lighten up. There was a huge drop in the price or value of the captive born animals also. They have since come back some. It used to be in the early days you would see cars on the xmas line up and wait their turn in a line. It was a zoo. Langtry was practically a car on every cut. I would guess with all the pressure in those ten years could have produced more animals then the following 20. Who knows. Many snakes were caught in that ten years. There were hoards of people hunting and the prices were higher for the animals taking into consideration the value of the dollar at the time. A river road would go for 300.00 to 400.00 back when the ban was in effect. Maybe 200.00 to 300.00 now for a wild caught. You would have to have been there to see it.
I was not trying to paint a wide brush but it is not hard to figure out that most people will not be getting permission to hunt on private property. I realize not all. Maybe a survey could be down to see who see spends all their time hunting private property and whose property it was. I guess they will have to post whose property that they caught in on anyway. If they truly did not have permission then I guess they would then be admitting to trespassing. So again wise not to post that you caught it on private property if you cannot back it up. After all all you guys that want them caught within a hundred feet would need to produce that information. I know that kingsnake.com as asked at times in the past that people not trespass on private property. Ric

Joe Forks Nov 22, 2009 07:54 PM

Ric,
Correct. The whole market will be (already has been?) turned upside down.
-----
Herp Conservation Unlimited
Conservation through captive propagation
Mexicana Group Directory
Photography by Joseph E. Forks

Joe Forks Nov 22, 2009 05:20 PM

it was 1987 sometime when the ban was lifted.... don't have the exact day, but it was in effect about 10 years.

The new law went into effect Sept. 1st 2007. They tried to say immediately, but that was not the case as it was a rider on HB 12.

Now what Ric is forgetting, is that it is still perfectly legal to collect on private property so long as you don't break other laws. Of course not everyone follows the law, but neither should you paint everyone with the same brush.

He is correct that Lacey Act is applicable anytime you have illegally collected wildlife.
-----
Herp Conservation Unlimited
Conservation through captive propagation
Mexicana Group Directory
Photography by Joseph E. Forks

bobassetto Nov 22, 2009 05:50 PM

so how do we name private collected locale....use gps coordinates???

rpelaez Nov 22, 2009 05:55 PM

Essentially hundreds, if not more than a thousand, Lampropeltis alterna were legally collected for at least 21 years. That's 21 years of supportable lineage information without a requirement to plead the fifth, so there's really no excuse for NOT having supportable documentation for specimens collected during that LONG open period. Does anyone really believe that all those legally collected specimens have made it onto to the GBK forum? I don't think so. How long has kingsnake.com been up? How long have they required an independent hosting site to post pictures? What about collectors that didn't have computers, or even digital cameras? They are so many reasons why a "new" picture of a wc snake would surface at this time - so the photo in and of itself should not be considered incriminating. Besides, I think the real reason people are sharing photos of their wc stuff at this time is because they have nothing else to do, LOL.

As far as I know, NO ONE is asking WHEN these snakes were collected (nor should they out of protest IMHO); only where, by whom and how it was acquired in the case you're not the orginal collector.

ARE YOU POSITIVE about the effective date of the road ban (September 1, 2007)?

Robert

Joe Forks Nov 22, 2009 06:07 PM

>>Essentially hundreds, if not more than a thousand, Lampropeltis alterna were legally collected for at least 21 years. That's 21 years of supportable lineage information without a requirement to plead the fifth, so there's really no excuse for NOT having supportable documentation for specimens collected during that LONG open period. Does anyone really believe that all those legally collected specimens have made it onto to the GBK forum? I don't think so. How long has kingsnake.com been up? How long have they required an independent hosting site to post pictures? What about collectors that didn't have computers, or even digital cameras? They are so many reasons why a "new" picture of a wc snake would surface at this time - so the photo in and of itself should not be considered incriminating. Besides, I think the real reason people are sharing photos of their wc stuff at this time is because they have nothing else to do, LOL.
>>
>>As far as I know, NO ONE is asking WHEN these snakes were collected (nor should they out of protest IMHO); only where, by whom and how it was acquired in the case you're not the orginal collector.
>>
>>ARE YOU POSITIVE about the effective date of the road ban (September 1, 2007)?
>>
>>Robert
-----
Herp Conservation Unlimited
Conservation through captive propagation
Mexicana Group Directory
Photography by Joseph E. Forks

rpelaez Nov 23, 2009 07:17 AM

This one may need a little research. I believe that one of the lynch pins for a successful Lacey Act prosecution is that the buyer (in a transaction involving illegally obtained wildlife) must possess reasonable knowledge that the wildlife has been obtained illegally. That standard of reasonableness is probably much different for a Komodo Dragon selling for $100, a Utah Milk Snake selling for $100 and an alterna selling for $100, which is why NO ONE should be discussing the year the parent stock was collected. In fact, when a seller makes it a point to inform the buyer that the snake (or parent stock) was collected from a public road during this road ban, chances are pretty good that the seller is part of a law enforcement sting-LOL.

Robert

Aaron Nov 22, 2009 07:18 PM

It was legal to collect by 1996. That was my first year. If the a ban started in 1987 then it was in effect less then 10 years.

I also think it must have been legal at least one or two years prior to 1996 because nobody was saying anything about the ban just being lifted. I think if it had just happened there would have been alot of people talking about it but nobody was.

rpelaez Nov 22, 2009 07:20 PM

LOL. The ban was LIFTED sometime in 1987.

Robert

Aaron Nov 22, 2009 07:21 PM

Ah yes, just caught that. Thanks.

Damon Salceies Nov 22, 2009 05:27 PM

One thing needs to be noted... it's still entirely legal for a licensed hunter to collect animals away from the right-of-way (and subsequently share and keep locality data without fear of legal entanglements). Ric's premise only applies to those collecting the right-of-way since the ROW ban went into effect.

Damon Salceies Nov 22, 2009 05:29 PM

I guess I shouldn't take so much time composing a response... Joe beat me to it LOL.

Joe Forks Nov 22, 2009 05:34 PM

>>I guess I shouldn't take so much time composing a response... Joe beat me to it LOL.

so no problemo....
-----
Herp Conservation Unlimited
Conservation through captive propagation
Mexicana Group Directory
Photography by Joseph E. Forks

Site Tools