Reptile & Amphibian Forums

Welcome to kingsnake.com's message board system. Here you may share and discuss information with others about your favorite reptile and amphibian related topics such as care and feeding, caging requirements, permits and licenses, and more. Launched in 1997, the kingsnake.com message board system is one of the oldest and largest systems on the internet.

Click for 65% off Shipping with Reptiles 2 You
Southwestern Center for Herpetological Research
Click here to visit Classifieds

US Fish & Wildlife Press Release

USARK Jan 20, 2010 07:05 PM

US Fish & Wildlife Service announced today that they want to initiate the process of 'Rule Change' to add the Burmese Python and 8 other large constrictors (as per USGS report) to the Injurious Wildlife list of the Lacey Act. They announced that they would publish this proposal in the Federal Register in early February. There will then be 60 days for the public to make comment.

This is an opportunity for the scientific process to play out. We have asked for science to trump political expediency. We have a team of scientists working on the science side and we have compiled much economic data in our work with the Congressional Budget Office. USARK will conduct a number of surveys around the country and on the Internet to collect vital information to provide to USFWS. We will have surveys at the door at the Tinley Park USARK/ PIJAC Summit meeting on February 13 & 14. It is incredibly important that everyone participate in the surveys in order that we can present the best information possible. We will also have petitions to be signed! Please come to the Summit. This will be the most important meeting in the history of the reptile industry. Every real player in this industry, as well as hobbyists, and the general public, need to attend the USARK/ PIJAC Summit. If you are a USARK Gold or Silver member please try to be there!

click below for NARBC USARK / PIJAC Summit Info
www.narbc.com/htm2006/tps_index.htm

Date: January 20, 2009
Contact: Vanessa Kauffman (FWS) (703) 358-2138
Kendra Barkoff (DOI) (202) 713-0827

Salazar Moves to Ban Importation and Interstate Transfer of Burmese Python and Eight Other Giant Invasive Snakes
FWS to Propose Injurious Species Listing under Lacey Act

NEW YORK, NY – Secretary of the Interior Ken Salazar today announced the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service will propose to list the Burmese python and eight other large constrictor snakes that threaten the Everglades and other sensitive ecosystems as “injurious wildlife” under the Lacey Act.

Salazar made the announcement at the Port of New York, which serves as the largest point of entry in the nation for imports of wildlife and wildlife products. Last year, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Inspectors at John F. Kennedy International Airport handled more than 27, 000 separate wildlife shipments valued at more than $1 billion, or 16 percent of all U.S. wildlife imports.

The proposal, which will be open to public comment before Salazar makes a final decision, would prohibit importation and interstate transportation of the animals.

“The Burmese python and these other alien snakes are destroying some of our nation’s most treasured – and most fragile – ecosystems,” Salazar said. “The Interior Department and states such as Florida are taking swift and common sense action to control and eliminate the populations of these snakes, but it is an uphill battle in ecosystems where they have no natural predators. If we are going to succeed, we must shut down the importation of the snakes and end the interstate commerce and transportation of them.”

In total, wildlife inspectors stationed at ports across the nation processed more than 169,700 shipments of wildlife and wildlife products last year with an estimated value of $2.7 billion.

“Our wildlife inspectors are the front line of defense for the nation, combating illegal wildlife trafficking and preventing the importation of countless species of illegal injurious wildlife. This proposal will give them an additional tool to restrict imports that are causing significant ecological and economic damage, while giving our law enforcement agents the ability to restrict the spread of these species within our borders,” said U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Director Sam Hamilton.

The nine species proposed for listing are: the Burmese python, northern African python, southern African python, reticulated python, green anaconda, yellow anaconda, Beni or Bolivian anaconda, DeSchauensee’s anaconda, and boa constrictor.

Many of these large snakes are popular as pets, and are associated with a large domestic and international trade. Over the past 30 years, about a million individuals of these nine species have been imported into the United States, and current domestic production of some species likely exceeds import levels.

Under the Lacey Act, the Secretary of the Interior is authorized to regulate the importation and interstate transport of species determined to be injurious to humans, the interests of agriculture, horticulture or forestry, and the welfare and survival of wildlife resources of the United States.

Sen. Bill Nelson, D-FL and Rep. Kendrick Meek, D-FL, have introduced legislation in Congress, supported by Secretary Salazar and the Obama Administration, which would also restrict importation and interstate sale and transportation of the nine species of constrictor snakes. Today’s proposal ensures that the injurious proposal will be considered through all available legislative and administrative avenues.

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service will publish the proposed rule in the Federal Register in early February. At that time, the Service will also make a draft economic analysis and draft environmental analysis available to the public. The public will then have 60 days to comment on the proposal.

The Burmese python is currently distributed across many thousands of square miles in south Florida and a population of boa constrictors is established south of Miami. In addition, recent evidence strongly suggests a reproducing population of northern African pythons on the western boundaries of Miami.

The U.S. Geological Survey issued a risk assessment last October that highlighted the threat.
Of the nine large constrictors assessed, five were shown to pose a high risk to the health of the ecosystem, including the Burmese python, northern African python, southern African python, yellow anaconda, and boa constrictor. The remaining four large constrictors—the reticulated python, green anaconda, Beni or Bolivian anaconda, and DeSchauensee’s anaconda—were shown to pose a medium risk.

Burmese pythons and other large constrictor snakes are highly adaptable to new environments
And are opportunistic in expanding their geographic range. More than 1,200 of the snakes have been removed from Everglades National Park since 2000, with others having been removed from the Florida Keys, along Florida’s west coast, and farther north along the Florida peninsula. Burmese pythons threaten many imperiled species and other wildlife. Two Burmese pythons were found near Crocodile Lake National Wildlife Refuge, and the remains of three endangered Key Largo wood rats were found in their stomachs.

Salazar strongly encouraged pet owners not to release snakes or any other pets into the wild.

“People may think that this is a convenient and humane way to be rid of unwanted animals, but as in the case of pythons and other constrictors, it can lead to devastating consequences for local wildlife populations and the ecosystems they depend on,” Salazar said.

Salazar said he has directed the Fish and Wildlife Service to conduct a comprehensive review of existing legal and regulatory authorities to address the invasive species issue on a broader scale.

“I’ve asked the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to make recommendations regarding the potential tools we need to address the invasive species challenge – both to combat existing invasive species problems and act more effectively to prevent the introduction of new invasive threats into our country,” said Salazar.

-----
Andrew Wyatt
President USARK

Replies (11)

jsschrei Jan 20, 2010 07:51 PM

Will it ever end?!

I guess I just don't understand how people can be so stupid. These animals can't possibly live anywhere but in So. Florida.

What are the chances that we'll (USARK, PIJAC, NatPet, Reptiles community in general) will be listened to? Are there any constituents that will take real science into consideration?

I am losing a lot of faith in our government.

Sorry about my ranting...a little frustrated.
-----
Cheers,
Jessica Gibbs
Ball Pythons; Corn Snakes; Green Tree Python; Jungle Carpet Python; Bci; Bcl; Bco
3.0 Crazy Dogs and 2.0 cats
Some Tropical Fish
...........and growing!

Ravenspirit Jan 20, 2010 08:33 PM

Seems to me that its a 2 prong deal - if they can't get S373 in, they will get this in that way.

Enjoy being law abiding citizens with your animals today. I fear soon we are all going to be criminals, and our pets and projects, illegal contraband.

KaiYudSai Jan 21, 2010 11:24 AM

This can be a good thing..... I have more faith in US Fish and Wildlife and the scientific process than a bunch of politicians....
-----
Marc Duhon
Lafayette, Louisiana
SURINAMBOAS.COM
kaiyudsai@SURINAMBOAS.COM

NUCCIZ_BOAS Jan 20, 2010 09:21 PM

recieved a response to one of the e-mails I sent. Seemed very vague, one of those copy/paste response e-mails. But definately seems against us. Looks like we're fighting an uphill battle.

Especially with the news of the New York law that is being proposed. I understand the problem in South Florida is a big concern, and Im not arguing against the point that something should be done. But I do not believe that outlawing 9 species of constrictors punishable by a FELONY is the answer. Along with the fact, realistically, they want to rid of import/interstate travel of the constrictors.... Aside from destroying the market we have all come to know and love, how is that going to stop the s. florida problem that seems to be the root of all this? Maybe Im missing something in all the reading Ive done.

I hope to see everybody at the Tinley Park show next month, I will for sure be there!

LarM Jan 20, 2010 11:55 PM

Subject: Your Concerns
Date: 1/19/2010 12:46:28 P.M. Central Standard Time
From: Senator_RolandBurris@burris.senate.gov
To:LarryMicklevitz@aol.com

Dear Larry:

Thank you for contacting me to share your views concerning S. 373, a bill to amend United States Code to classify nine species of constrictor snakes as injurious species. I appreciate the benefit of your views.

In 2003, biologists at the Everglades National Park in Florida identified a breeding population of Burmese python in the Everglades. Since then, scientists have uncovered python populations in Big Cypress National Preserve, Miami, Key Largo, as well as state parks, municipalities, and public and private lands in the region. In October 2009, the United States Geological Survey released an assessment of the biological impacts associated with potential colonization of the United States by any of the nine giant constrictors, and concluded they posed an exceptional threat to the integrity of native ecosystems.

The benefits associated with importation, trade and possession of giant constrictors were not incorporated into the previous relevant ecological and environmental reports, because these were inherently limited in scope and jurisdiction to ecological and environmental analysis. Now it is the responsibility of Congress to weigh those concerns, and consider the potential social and economic impacts of banning the sale and importation of exotic pets. I respect my constituents’ desire to keep and care for exotic pets. Should S. 373 reach the Senate floor for a vote, I will keep your views in mind.

I will continue to listen closely to what constituents have to say about matters before Congress, the concerns of our communities, and the issues facing Illinois and the nation. My job is not about merely supporting or opposing legislation; it is also about bridging the divide that has paralyzed our nation's politics.

Sincerely,

Roland W. Burris
United States Senator

------------------------------------------------------------------------

But here is the first response I got , needless to say
I was less than happy with it

Subject: Your Concerns
Date: 1/6/2010 4:09:27 P.M. Central Standard Time
From: Senator_RolandBurris@burris.senate.gov
To:LarryMicklevitz@aol.com

Dear Larry:

Thank you for contacting me with your thoughts on the Employment Non-Discrimination Act of 2009 and the right to guarantee employment to individuals regardless of sexual orientation and gender identity. I appreciate hearing your thoughts on such an important issue.

Today, too many individuals within the United States are either losing or are unable to obtain jobs due to their sexual orientations or gender. These Americans simply want to go to work and live quality lives, contributing their talents and energy to our great nation. We are a better nation when everyone here has an opportunity to succeed and the discrimination and fear of termination that they currently face should not be allowed under federal law.

The Employment Non-Discrimination Act was introduced on August 5th by Senator Jeff Merkely. I am a cosponsor of the bill because I believe that there is great strength in our diversity. Given a fair opportunity at employment, the American people make up the greatest workforce on earth. Together, we can revitalize our economy and once again lead the world. While the legislation has currently been referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions, rest assured that I will continue to fight to provide all Americans with an equal opportunity for success.

I will continue to listen closely to what you and other Illinoisans have to say about matters before Congress, the concerns of our communities, and the issues facing Illinois and the nation. My job is not about merely supporting or opposing legislation; it is also about bridging the divide that has paralyzed our nation's politics.

Sincerely,

Roland W. Burris
United States Senator

------------------------------------------
At least they are getting their info correct in their latest responses

. . . Lar M
-----
Boas By Klevitz

I Support USark.org

NUCCIZ_BOAS Jan 21, 2010 12:09 AM

pathetic, but yes, thats the same response I got from him, the response about the reptiles that is, lol!

LarM Jan 21, 2010 01:09 AM

Yep if it wasn't so sad and irritating it would be pretty funny

I saw a physically fit guy at a table / booth in Dupage.

For a minute I thought it was you , I had to ask his name

. . . Lar M
-----
Boas By Klevitz

I Support USark.org

NUCCIZ_BOAS Jan 21, 2010 12:31 PM

haha, might have been the guy from Chicago Reptile House, is a pretty big guy. I was not at the last show. I will be at the next one though, I believe its Feb 6????? I have to meet with a friend to get one of my males back that I lent out on a breeder loan. So I will be there

LarM Jan 21, 2010 01:13 PM

I was at the Door getting letters signed last show but
I'm not certain if I'll be involved with anything
in a "public level" at the next show.

I'll keep my eyes open , ha ha

. . . Lar M
-----
Boas By Klevitz

I Support USark.org

SgtStinky Jan 21, 2010 05:29 AM

thanks for posting his email, I sent him my thoughts too.

NUCCIZ_BOAS Jan 20, 2010 09:34 PM

I was just snooping around some websites out of boredom, saw places to donate to USARK via paypal.

Just an idea I had, I thought we be cool, maybe has been done already. For all of the upcoming shows, I know USARK has booths set up. I propose the idea of maybe having some t-shirts made up to sell to help fund USARK and also spread the message of uniting to stop the ban.

Maybe something simple, a big stop sign saying "STOP S373" with a boa constrictor wrapped around it, or something to that effect.

Just an idea, Im sure those kind of shirts would sell and would be nice to walk around tinley/daytona/texas and see those shirts everywhere you turn.

Site Tools