Reptile & Amphibian Forums

Welcome to kingsnake.com's message board system. Here you may share and discuss information with others about your favorite reptile and amphibian related topics such as care and feeding, caging requirements, permits and licenses, and more. Launched in 1997, the kingsnake.com message board system is one of the oldest and largest systems on the internet.

Click for 65% off Shipping with Reptiles 2 You
Click for ZooMed
Click for 65% off Shipping with Reptiles 2 You

a response from CA senator Feinstein

albinorosy Jan 22, 2010 03:05 PM

Dear Mr. Goldbarg:

Thank you for writing to express your opposition to legislation that would place large constrictor snakes on the injurious species list. I appreciate your correspondence and welcome the opportunity to respond.

As you know, Senator Bill Nelson (D-FL) introduced S.373 on February 3, 2009. S. 373 and its companion bill in the House of Representatives, H.R. 2811, would amend the Lacey Act (42 U.S.C. w 18) to include constrictor snakes, such as the Burmese Python, as injurious species. Under the Lacey Act, the Secretary of the Interior is authorized to regulate the importation and transport of species determined to be injurious to the health and welfare of humans. Currently, S.373 has been referred to the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works. Although I do not serve on this Committee, I will keep your opposition to this bill, as well as maintaining a science-based review process, in mind should S.373 or any similar legislation be considered by the Senate.

Once again, thank you for writing. If you have any further questions or comments, please feel free to contact my Washington, D.C. office at (202) 224-3841. Best regards.
Sincerely yours,
Dianne Feinstein
United States Senator

Replies (5)

jsschrei Jan 22, 2010 05:33 PM

I got the exact same response today. It is a little irritating that the response states that the bill is reffered to committee, when it has already in fact passed committee and going for vote. It is an old, automated response to the issue.
-----
Cheers,
Jessica Gibbs
Ball Pythons; Corn Snakes; Green Tree Python; Jungle Carpet Python; Bci; Bcl; Bco
3.0 Crazy Dogs and 2.0 cats
Some Tropical Fish
...........and growing!

kylefrost Jan 22, 2010 06:52 PM

I got the same one too, and to two different Email addresses. Was there even a point to sending personalized letters? Should I bother responding if they didn't read my first letter?

LarM Jan 22, 2010 08:37 PM

Are you saying you sent an E-mail or a personal letter ?

Personal letter would be sent snail mail or better yet to Tom Wolfe
and delivered by Tom to your Senators personally

. . . Lar M
-----
Boas By Klevitz

I Support USark.org

kylefrost Jan 22, 2010 09:06 PM

Both. I sent a stack of the copied and signed letters to Tom Wolfe on Monday but I dont know if the canned message was in response to a letter or Email I sent weeks ago.

LarM Jan 22, 2010 09:57 PM

The "canned response" was in reference to your E-0mail almost certainly

We know the Gov doesn't work that fast , ha ha

. . . Lar M
-----
Boas By Klevitz

I Support USark.org

Site Tools