Some would say that true leucistics are animals that have completely unfunctioning precurser pigment cells or precurser pigment cells that did not migrate from the neural crest. These animals should be completely white with normally colored eyes. Eyes should be a normal color (IE, not blue...) because eye pigment does not develop along the neural crest. Anything with color at birth or in the eyes is not a true lucy. (Note: Some patchy, spotty pigment may develop with adulthood. This has little to do with the genotype at birth)
Others may say that the ability for color cells to function and distribute on an animal is a sliding scale. So an entire category of white (off-white, piebald, and pale-striped too) animals would fit into the leucistic category because their precursor pigment cells are *barely* functioning.
My opinion is in support of the latter theory. Have a leucistic category that various morphs fit in to, but give them original names. For instance, instead of multiple combinations all creating Black and Blue eyed leucistics, these combinations should have their own name that would indicate the morph combo (and thus, intuitively, where it falls on the sliding-pigment-scale). MojaveXMojave = Super Mojave. ButterXMojave= Super Mutter? Something like that.
-----
Lincoln, NE
0.1 Pastel, 1.0 Pastel het Pied, 0.1 Pied, 0.1 Cinn, 1.0 Black Pewter, 1.0 Woma (hidden gene?), 0.1 Yellowbelly
2.0 Normals, 1.0 Thayeri, 0.1 Thayeri X Alterna, 0.1 crazy cat, 1.0 husband