Oh yes!,......I agree once again!..LOL!
The whole thing is very interesting and extremely complicated. Seems like the more one knows about these snakes, the more confusing things can get. 
I have also had many great conversations and correspondences with Scott and others about them, and I find it quite interesting to say the very least(as I'm sure you do too).
Here are a couple VERY probable authentic "oligozona" I had from many years ago that I hatched(a good 15 years ago). I can only kick myself square in the butt though now for not keeping them all and propagated more of the same. The w/c import mother died soon after laying the eggs which I did hatch successfully. I hatched six, but only have pics of four of them sadly. And NO pic of the freakin mother either. That really bends me out'a shape too!
Scott showed me a tagged locality museum specimen years ago that looked absolutely IDENTICAL to the ones I had in every single meristical detail...........oh the pain of them being gone forever!........arrrgh!
These all had 16 to 17 RBR, and were the most genuine looking Scott has ever seen anywhere. I see alleged specimens in many books that don't even come close to what they are described as being merisic-wise, and makes me simply go......huhh???..LOL! I mean the name "oligozona" itself refers to them having "few bands" as I'm sure you are already aware of.
Who knows what the future of taxonomy will bring?. Perhaps a bit MORE confusion too I think!..hahahaa!
Take care Colester!
~Doug




-----
"a snake in the grass is a GOOD thing" 
my website -serpentinespecialties.webs.com