>> Hopefully this will help discredit the USGS report that says snakes are going to run rampant all over the country if we don't ban them.
>>Paul D
In a normal world, yes, this would be the end of all the nonsense. In the bizarro world of agenda-driven "science", though, it's just another issue they have to spin correctly. They already are trying to spin it. Just look at the headline of the article. They've already concluded:
1) the pythons have not been "halted"
2) the "survival rate" is much higher in the "field" since about 60 of the 99 pythons they spotted were alive.
Basing the survival rate on the number of snakes "spotted" is either incompetent or dishonest. Undoubtedly a large number of dead pythons would have been eaten by scavengers, one can't ignore that. And of course there was no mention of the health of any of the surviving pythons, either for the one monitored python or any of the pythons in the "field." For all we know, 90% of the survivors could have terminal respiratory infections.
Sorry to sound negative, but I've been following this issue long enough to see that logic, reason and common sense are not part of the equation for those pushing the agenda of banning our pets. If it were, the USGS report never would have been published in the first place. 