Parthenogenesis. Is it possible? And should we even talk about it?
Have their been any conclusive studies to prove a case of parthenogenesis in boas? I honestly don't know, so I'm just asking.
Whenever something that doesn't fit into our ideas of how boas should work (they don't read our books) with regards to breeding, parthenogenesis is often offered up as a possible explanation. Just this season, I've seen it tossed around at least a half a dozen times. Do we really think it's that common? Again, if there is NOT any conclusive study demonstrating parthenogenesis in boas to be possible, why do we all jump to that conclusion so quickly, and so often? If there is proof it's happened in boas, how rare is it?
On to the second question. Should we talk about it?
The reason I ask this is because this is one of the arguments of the "pro-ban" people. They assert that two animals don't even have to meet in the wild, to produce more. Just one can exist, duplicate itself, and cause harm to the environment. Obviously if there's only one, and it duplicates, it's a female and if there are no males around, in theory all of them will eventually die, but that doesn't matter when you're trying to save the "endangered key largo wood rat" (there was tons of sarcasm and silly voices in my head as I typed that last half of the sentence by the way).
So, what do you think?
jb
-----
What's written above is purely my opinion. In fact, MOST of what you read on the internet is someone's opinion. Don't take it too seriously 
Jonathan Brady
DeviantConstrictors.com
Deviant Constrictors picturetrail





