Reptile & Amphibian Forums

Welcome to kingsnake.com's message board system. Here you may share and discuss information with others about your favorite reptile and amphibian related topics such as care and feeding, caging requirements, permits and licenses, and more. Launched in 1997, the kingsnake.com message board system is one of the oldest and largest systems on the internet.

Click for 65% off Shipping with Reptiles 2 You
Click for ZooMed
Click here for Dragon Serpents

Why do people frown on Jurrassics?

spintix Apr 27, 2010 06:51 PM

Why do people frown on this so much even if they are in the same category, such as different milk snakes? The more genetically related and interbred a species is, the less variation and the Weaker the offspring. This has proven time and time again in "pure breeding" of almost every single "purebred" variety of dog.

Another scenario.. You see white people and black people making babies or white and hispanic people making babies etc. and do you frown on their parents for making them and consider them unfit half breeds as well?

Replies (60)

KevinM Apr 27, 2010 10:22 PM

Human beings are all Homo sapiens. We are the same species with the same DNA showing geographical variability. Its like a dark colored cornsnake from LA breeding with a very bright corn from Florida. They are different looking in coloration, build, etc, but both Elaphe guttata. Mixing two different species or even subspecies of snakes is like mixing a cow with a buffaloe. They are NOT the same species and are NOT naturally occuring in the wild except for rare occassions, even if compatible to breed. Thats great if all you want to produce is "meat", but not if you want to specifically produce cows or buffaloes. Hybrid snakes also have a tendency to screw things up in the herp world for folks that want a particular species. Now, many folks are afraid that the species they want may have "other" species in the mix. Prime examples are milksnakes. I have a suspect female honduran that I am not sure exactly what her lineage is. If I breed her to a honduran male, I will still have to wrestle with the ethics of selling her babies as honduran milks. Yes, continuous line breeding with a small population will bring about defects. Dog breeds are a perfect example, and its why we dont breed with our family members. It doesnt mean to offset this that we breed with other species like chimps, even if we were capable of producing offspring.

DMong Apr 28, 2010 11:32 AM

I just don't have the energy for this one today Kevin.

Rock on brother!!

To the original poster...........

would you want to be able to call your snake a certain KIND of snake?,......or simply just a SNAKE?????

dogs and livestock might "sound" like they are similar examples, but they have nothing to do with this issue whatsoever!

If you can produce a hybrid or intergrade snake to pull my snow sled, or fetch my game birds, by all means, let me know and I will buy some from you.

~Doug

-----
"a snake in the grass is a GOOD thing"

my website -serpentinespecialties.webs.com

Amanda_D Apr 28, 2010 11:48 AM

Some people just want "pure blood" in their snakes, usually for breeding purposes. They get miffed when they get a snake from some one who is unethical and does not tell them it is a hybrid. Then they can't use that snake for the planned project because the offspring will not be "pure".

People who just want a pet usually wont care. Some people love hybrids. Jurrassic or jungle corns (king X corn) can be beautiful and just get better with age. I am hoping to make some myself. I struck out this year but I can try again next.

Responsible breeders of "pure blood" snakes take care that they get their founding stock from different sorces so they can avoid inbreeding. They will often trade snakes with each other to spread blood lines.

In the end it is all a matter of opinion. It's like opera or broccoly. You either love it or hate it. (not an opera fan, love broccoly)
-----
1 BP
4 Cal Kings 3 alb 1 het
3 Alb Corn
1 Rev Alb Nelsons

KevinM Apr 28, 2010 11:56 AM

There is nothing inherently wrong with these hybrids in and of themselves. Some are gorgeous and one of a kind to be sure. As Amanda stated, some breeders may have a tendency to sell off their less than spectacular/cool/mindblowing offspring unethically in an effort to "take out the trash". They just call it what it looks like. These "garbage" snakes then get lost in the herp community. There are tons of snake species being sold with muddied pasts that some folks just dont want to fool with anymore because of this stigma. LA Pines come to mind, and its getting harder and harder to find plain old vanilla sinaloan milks due to mixing with nelsons for the amel trait. Many brooks kings have some hidden stuff floating around from morph projects as well. On the outside they look like what they are supposed too. However, if I have a project to breed plain old sinaloans, I dont want amels or other WTF snakes popping up in my clutch LOL!!

varanid Apr 28, 2010 03:24 PM

Add to that blood and carpet pythons. It's why I'm leery of hybrids. They don't disgust me in and of themselves, I'm just not fond of what's happened to several species after extensive hybridizing; is that a JCP or an IJP or a mix that I'm getting? it's pretty much a crapshoot at this point.
-----
We wouldn't have 6 and a half billion people if you had to be beautiful to get laid.
6.6 African House snakes
3.2 reticulated pythons
.1 corn snake
4.2 Florida Kings
1.2 speckled kings
1.2 ball pythons
0.0.1 Argentine boa

JKruse Apr 28, 2010 04:49 PM

SIGGGHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!

Just when I thought the nauseous carousel stopped spinning!

*deep breath*

Human beings are evolved, transient creates that bhave a higher overall capacity for evolved behaviors such as complex thinking and emotional capacity. Snakes? They don't. Although some snakes are consider more "inteligent" than others, such as indigos and coachwhips, they are also not driven by much more than innate needs/drives specifically for survival. Snakes can be imprinted upon due to external stimuli that either favor or do not favor them, and of course usually select for what favors them. A California kingsnake can not buy a plane ticket to New York and hook up with an Asian ratsnake simply because it likes the Asian persuasian -- IT IS HUMAN SELECTION AND DOWNRIGHT STUPIDITY to take a Cal king and mix it with an Asian ratsnake. It's unnatural and unethical, particularly when these snakes will NEVER encounter each other in the wild nor will they anytime soon -- of course if the film 2012 is depicted correctly and California winds up shifting over to China, then YES, these two VERY different snakes can and will have the NATURAL ability to integrate and, over time, become its on species....NOT because people like Frank Retes says its okay.

Take this message to heart.....as hybridizing and crossing really mucks up the integrity of these beautiful snakes that has taken EONS to create. Yes, captive breeding artificially promotes certain traits that we select for, yda yada yada....been thru this discussion a gajillion times......BUT at least if I line breed over generations at the end I CAN STILL CALL IT WHAT IT INITIALLY STARTED OUT TO BE....a pure species or ssp with simply a phenotype that has been selected for -- NOT a bastardized mutt that has no place being created.

My kids are half Filipino too.....I chose to do that with a different ssp and selected for the top-heavy phenotype with cute smile.......snakes just can't do that. Hope you can see the difference.

Have a lovely evening.
-----
Jerry Kruse
www.zonatas.com

And God said, "Let there be zonata subspecies for all to ponder..."

RickGordon Apr 30, 2010 11:40 PM

Personally I think that people that believe that there captive bred snake is "natural" are living under a delusion. The truth is that a "natural" snake is one that survives in the wild, and has faced it's predators and environmental extremes, and has survived to adulthood, most of which do not! Nature produces an excess of neonate snakes but only a few survive to breed. Captive breeding however brings into adulthood many snakes that would not be judged by nature to be fit to represent the species. So face it, your captive bred snake is a freak. Only by being "pure blood" you maintain the illusion of normality.

KevinM May 01, 2010 03:39 PM

I dont recall anyone on this post arguing about captive bred snakes being "natural". This discussion was directed towards hybridization. If I understand your statements correctly, are you agreeing hybridization is OK or doesnt matter in captive bred situations due to the fact you feel no captive bred snake is natural anyway?

DMong May 01, 2010 05:34 PM

"I dont recall anyone on this post arguing about captive bred snakes being "natural"

Good obsevation Kevin, because I certainly didn't either. That seems to be a fairly common response that many use that has absolutely nothing to do with the dpecific issue here.

Jerry's ONLY point was to strive to keep them a genuine subspecies without being intergraded or hybridized with other unrelated types of snakes....simple as that.

I have never seen a "natural" plastic tub either in all my years, but at least one can strive to keep things a specific subspecies regardless, and that is what has always been the most important aspect of snake breeding for me, and many others. Not just to simply "make stuff".

~Doug
-----
"a snake in the grass is a GOOD thing"

my website -serpentinespecialties.webs.com

JKruse May 02, 2010 05:37 AM

.....indeed........that's not having anything to do with the original thread, but SURE would make for another 9 rounds of a "nature vs. nurture" discussion. We've done it before Doug, LOL.

Just to reiterate, it's about natural SELECTION versus intentional man-made hybridization...........nothing having to do with our captive charges being line bred for human-selected traits. That's two totally different discussions.

Hybrids.......BOOOOOOOOOOOOOO......it's just wrong.
-----
Jerry Kruse
www.zonatas.com

And God said, "Let there be zonata subspecies for all to ponder..."

RickGordon May 02, 2010 08:16 PM

Yes,and I predict pretty soon we will start seeing the availability of genetically engineered snakes. To me, it is all good. They are all result of human intervention, some just more then others.

KevinM May 03, 2010 09:02 AM

Engineered snakes are all fine and dandy. I have always felt hybrids are not bad in and off themselves. Its when they are represented unethically by vendors and knowingly or erroneously allowed to contaminate non-hybrid lines. Its like buying a Porsche and finding out it is a kit car with a VW engine under the hood. You may never notice the fact and be totally fine and happy with the car for what it is. Then one day you go to sell it and the buyer pops open the hood and finds out the truth. Regardless of how cool you think the car is and how "just like a Porche" you feel it is, its now WORTHLESS to someone looking for a real Porsche. Think you would be bummed?

DMong May 03, 2010 01:10 PM

And one that always seems to get get twisted around for crissakes!

This argument about them being great as long as they are represented honestly is PURE BUNK!!!. Everyone that knows ANYTHING about this hobby/industry, knows that everything gets sold sometime down the line as what it basically "best" represents, or "looks" like, it's as simple as that. You and I see this ALL THE FREAKIN TIME!!!.

Who the hell wants a Corvet with Ford Pinto parts bolted onto it anyway??. Keeping snakes a genuine subspecies is EXACTLY like having a classic car, or an antique gun that still has matching serial numbers on all of it's parts. Otherwise, it depletes what the item is worth(I'm not talking necessarily money-wise either of course!). it makes the product nothing but everyday junk as far as I am concerned.

Yeah, what do I know though. Keeping snakes their own subspecies is boring to those who want to swap parts and serial numbers, and add "flames" to the hood of an old genuine classic Rolls Royce..LOL!

The only reason everybody does this, is because they see others doing it. Just like the phrase....."monkey see, monkey do"

~Doug
-----
"a snake in the grass is a GOOD thing"

my website -serpentinespecialties.webs.com

KevinM May 03, 2010 01:28 PM

Therein lies the problem Doug. There are no serial numbers to cross check for validity on snakes. Sure, you can examine the phenotype with blotch and scale counts, widths, head scalation, etc., etc., etc. But you are can never get "under the hood" or "inside the body" to check the serial numbers, ie, DNA.

DMong May 03, 2010 02:11 PM

Very valid point!.......

..... but you don't want to KNOWINGLY bolt on bogus parts, or change the "serial numbers" as so many are intent on doing if you can help it. That is the only point I am trying to make here.

The fact that there are many snakes out there that might already have other geneflow doesn't mean that it is a good reason for people to do their best to muddy-up things that still might be genuine to the best of their ability. That is really all I am saying, and certainly all I can do, .....know what I mean?

In any case though, no matter what anyone else's view is on it, that is what I will continue to do anyway.

A known Pueblan ain't gonna get bred to a floridana at my house anyway..LOL!

~Doug
-----
"a snake in the grass is a GOOD thing"

my website -serpentinespecialties.webs.com

RickGordon May 02, 2010 08:19 PM

It seems you are contradicting yourself here, sure looks like you are making the argument that it is unnatural.

RickGordon May 02, 2010 08:20 PM

in your own words:"It's unnatural and unethical, particularly when these snakes will NEVER encounter each other in the wild nor will they anytime soon "

JKruse May 02, 2010 11:43 PM

That's what I said......California kingsnakes and Asian ratsnakes, as an exmple, will never encounter eachother in the wild and to intentionally cross them is unethical. Point well made. Thanks.

By the way, if you have a different world map than I do, please advise. Last I checked on mine California was nowhere near China, again as an example. Just like Virginia is nowhere near Texas, thus crossing an alterna with an eastern king is an abomination. Clear?

Have a great night...
-----
Jerry Kruse
www.zonatas.com

And God said, "Let there be zonata subspecies for all to ponder..."

DMong May 03, 2010 01:21 PM

.......isn't it EVERYBODY'S American right to ruin as many genuine bloodlines as possible out there??..LMFAO!!!!

~Doug

Image
-----
"a snake in the grass is a GOOD thing"

my website -serpentinespecialties.webs.com

KevinM May 03, 2010 02:34 PM

Hey man, I need to show you my Rolex watch I bought for $20 at the pawn shop yesterday. The PLASTIC crystal is a bit scratched and a little of the gold finish is flecked off showing the tin body underneath in places, but otherwise its a Jenuwine Rolex LMFAO!!!

DMong May 03, 2010 02:46 PM

LOL!!,.....hey!, if it "looks" similar to an authentic one, and says "Rowlecks" on the dial, ....what's the problem??..LMAO!!

~Doug
-----
"a snake in the grass is a GOOD thing"

my website -serpentinespecialties.webs.com

RickGordon May 05, 2010 10:50 PM

But don't you get it? your so called pure lines are just Roleckes. They are man made knock offs of the real thing. in nature 99 percent of hatched snakes are unfit to represent the species and do not make it to adult hood. Any captive bred snake you choose to care for is not select by it's natural ability to survive within it's niche but by your personal likes or dislikes. The only real pure blood natural snake is a wild caught adult, all the rest are man made interpertations, fake Roleckes. So your comparison of one knock off to another and suggesting that one is somehow more genuine is just laughable.

DMong May 06, 2010 03:19 AM

yes!!!, now I DO get it!

That is how you guys justify making junk!

The only thing that is laughable, is your big bullsh*t cloud of smoke bro!
-----
"a snake in the grass is a GOOD thing"

my website -serpentinespecialties.webs.com

KevinM May 06, 2010 10:25 AM

Doug, please see the email I sent you and "let it go"!!

JKruse May 02, 2010 05:27 AM

I personally think you might want to think through what you really want to say before you write it, as Doug makes for a good point in that your response completely missed the target.

You said: "Captive breeding however brings into adulthood many snakes that would not be judged by nature to be fit to represent the species."

I believe I already acknowledged that point and clearly addressed it. Maybe you missed it.

As for "natural", LOL.......that's a whole 'nother conversation brother. Re-read the thread please.....
-----
Jerry Kruse
www.zonatas.com

And God said, "Let there be zonata subspecies for all to ponder..."

varanid May 02, 2010 09:01 AM

Devils' advocate:
Then what makes your un-natural selection better? What makes it more "right" to maintain a pure species/subspecies? It's a particularly valid point when it comes in intergrades since those do occur naturally all the time; look at holbrooki x splendida. As far as naturally occuring hybrids..look at the edible frog.
The anti-hybrid stance basically seems to boil down to "Keep it pure" without an actual reason. You've given several *examples* of how unnatural it is (the line about a human flying to another country for mating purposes)...but that isn't the same as saying it's wrong.

As a disclaimer, I'm not too fond of hybrids, but again, it's mostly because of what's happened with a few particular species/groups of animals (milks, blood pythons, carpet pythons...). It's not something inherent to them.
-----
We wouldn't have 6 and a half billion people if you had to be beautiful to get laid.
6.6 African House snakes
3.2 reticulated pythons
.1 corn snake
4.2 Florida Kings
1.2 speckled kings
1.2 ball pythons
0.0.1 Argentine boa

JKruse May 02, 2010 11:52 PM

But why even play devil's advocate when there's no need to? It just mucks things up. I never said keeping things pure was "my way" or "best"....where did you get that from? Furthermore, if you think hybridization has no problems behind it, then so be it. But we will indeed argue over it.

Moreover I never specified natural intergrade zones either....that's one thing. I'M TALKING ABOUT SOMEONE INTENTIONALLY TAKING A MALE CALIFORNIA KING AND DUMPING IT INTO A FEMALE CORNSNAKE'S TUB......

Capiche??? Natural variants are one thing, and again, natural integrade zones are understandable......but Corndurans and Imperial Pueblans (Cal king x Pueblan).......?

I honestly can't fathom how you'd respond to that unless you were completely pro-hybrid.

'Evening.......
-----
Jerry Kruse
www.zonatas.com

And God said, "Let there be zonata subspecies for all to ponder..."

varanid May 03, 2010 12:19 AM

because you're not giving *reasons* that natural is better. You're just stating it's unnatural, which is silly given that the WHOLE HOBBY is unnatural. Stating that you oppose hybrids because they're not natural just doesn't make any sense. Nothing we do is natural. Being in favor of herpetoculture, but then opposed to hybrids on the grounds they're not natural is not an internally consistent position.

I'm not really pro or anti hybrid. Most of the time they get at most a "meh" from me. I just like arguing on occasion, particularly when I see arguments that don't make sense. As stated previously, my big concern with hybrids is that in some circumstances, sloppy records/unethical keepers have made it hard to know what you're actually getting.
-----
We wouldn't have 6 and a half billion people if you had to be beautiful to get laid.
6.6 African House snakes
3.2 reticulated pythons
.1 corn snake
4.2 Florida Kings
1.2 speckled kings
1.2 ball pythons
0.0.1 Argentine boa

RickGordon May 03, 2010 12:01 PM

Varanid, its seems like we are in agreement, as for the poor record keeping that is an issue whether hybrids are involved or not, although certainly worse in that situation.

DMong May 03, 2010 01:50 PM

Records really don't mean squat when it comes to this issue. They are sold later on as whatever the hell they look like(read my above posts).

If you want to be able to call it a certain type, then you have to KEEP it a certain type, otherwise they are simply generic snakes without any specific identity whatsoever. Not to mention once they are out in the hobby mainstream, they can only make MORE snakes that aren't genuine as well. They can never be taken back once they are out there in the hobby breeding all over the country/world in collections, and their offspring will only make more diluted snakes, and so on, and so on, and so on, and so on, and so on, and so on, and so on, and so on, and so on.............get the point here yet??

Please tell me I am not just spinning my wheels and wasting my time explaining this like I think I am doing.

See, this all boils down to the future of specific types of snakes for others to be able to enjoy and own down the road. Not so they have to go to a freakin nature museum to see a real Sinaloan, or whatever it might be.

If none of this makes any sense, then none of this matters, and that is truly the unfortunate part about all this.

~Doug
-----
"a snake in the grass is a GOOD thing"

my website -serpentinespecialties.webs.com

RickGordon May 05, 2010 10:55 PM

They are all ingenuine that is what you don't get, each generation that a snake is remove from the wild the more diluted it is by human choice. The problem here is that you believe that the captive bred snakes after 20 years or more of breeding can be just like the ones in the wild. That is a physical impossiblity.

JKruse May 03, 2010 04:23 PM

You said:

"because you're not giving *reasons* that natural is better. You're just stating it's unnatural, which is silly given that the WHOLE HOBBY is unnatural. Stating that you oppose hybrids because they're not natural just doesn't make any sense. Nothing we do is natural. Being in favor of herpetoculture, but then opposed to hybrids on the grounds they're not natural is not an internally consistent position.

I'm not really pro or anti hybrid. Most of the time they get at most a "meh" from me. I just like arguing on occasion, particularly when I see arguments that don't make sense. As stated previously, my big concern with hybrids is that in some circumstances, sloppy records/unethical keepers have made it hard to know what you're actually getting."

Do i really need to give a reason as to why a pure Sinaloan milk is better than a Sinacorn? Must i really go there? I thought it was obvious.

As for how i don't make sense to you, like Doug said below, thats the concerning part. I know that in 20 years I'd like my son to be able to still be able to purchase a king or a milk and not have to question it's purity or integrity. At the end of the day, thats what it boils down to...INTEGRITY. Moreover, if it doesnt make sense to you how hybridizing a Cal king with an Asian ratsnake isnt natural, then I'm extremely concerned, as I think it also obvious that these snakes just dont naturally come into contact with eachother in nature, so why manipulate something un-natural in captive care. BUT, you take two Cal kings...DESPITE selecting for a certain trait....and at the end of the day THEY ARE STILL CALIFORNIA KINGSNAKES.

You're taking my word "natural" and stretching it into areas it doesnt need to go, as we're talking about the integrity of what a snake is and the most unfortunate consequences of when intentional hybridization occurs.....I KNOW IT ISNT NATURAL WHEN WE AS BREEDERS SELECT FOR TRAITS AND CHOOSE FOR THE SNAKES WHICH MATES WILL GO WITH THEM.....for the third time I KNOW THIS.....But we're not talking about that......we're talking about the assinine irresponsibility of those that take two VERY different species of snake and hybridize them. Claro???

The task of getting the simplicity of this across is exhausting. actually
-----
Jerry Kruse
www.zonatas.com

And God said, "Let there be zonata subspecies for all to ponder..."

varanid May 03, 2010 04:56 PM

Do i really need to give a reason as to why a pure Sinaloan milk is better than a Sinacorn? Must i really go there? I thought it was obvious.
Sure go ahead. It's non-obvious to me. We keep snakes because we like them. Certain species or individuals appeal to me more than others.

You keep saying it's obvious but you keep not stating why this is, in fact, the bright line that should not be crossed. You go on and on and act like anyone who's not anti-hybrid is an ijit, unethical, or crazy without giving an actual reason why. it's all sound and fury signifying nothing.
-----
We wouldn't have 6 and a half billion people if you had to be beautiful to get laid.
6.6 African House snakes
3.2 reticulated pythons
.1 corn snake
4.2 Florida Kings
1.2 speckled kings
1.2 ball pythons
0.0.1 Argentine boa

JKruse May 03, 2010 07:16 PM

So you are okay with Puebdurans and Sinacorns then..........."just because they are appealing". Hmmm....okay.

I don't believe you're rationale for them being "okay" is heard.

You're asking me for justification in keeping a species or ssp "pure".....wow......this hobby really has taken a downturn. I can't possibly take more time on this....as it's clear to some. To those that are careless and find only beauty on the surface, well, such evidence secondary to this is rampant on the forums a speople ask "is my snake really what it's supposed to be?" I'm so sorry you can't see the damage in that.
-----
Jerry Kruse
www.zonatas.com

And God said, "Let there be zonata subspecies for all to ponder..."

DMong May 03, 2010 09:06 PM

When he has to take his kids to a museum later on to see a genuinely authentic species or subspecies, then he might start to understand what we were talking about way back in 2010. Because as you already know all too well, that is where things are quickly going in this hobby.

~Doug
-----
"a snake in the grass is a GOOD thing"

my website -serpentinespecialties.webs.com

DMong May 04, 2010 11:50 AM

you said... "The anti-hybrid stance basically seems to boil down to "Keep it pure" without an actual reason"

you said.. "my big concern with hybrids is that in some circumstances, sloppy records/unethical keepers have made it hard to know what you're actually getting"

REASONS

1)....Is that surprising that so many don't know what they are actually getting?,...(answer)..no, actually, it is only inevitable that this happens quite often.

2)....and what about all the babies that are created from these already "un-known" crosses?,....and their babies babies, and so on forever. AND what are they even being bred with?

3)....many people that acquire these un-knowns, or ANY snakes for that matter aren't very experienced at all with snake identification, or have ANY meristical identifying experience, so they will call any of these un-known crossed snakes whatever they think they tend to best represent at the time. Then of course SOLD as such too.

4)....what do the buyer's of ALL THESE UN-KNOWN SNAKES DO???

yes!,....they breed them of course,....and to what exactly??

5)....and THIS is the real irony of all this. If people didn't cross stuff all the time, nobody would even be seeing this issue CONSTANTLY being talked about, now would they??..LOL!

6)....The fact that it has already been done for so long, it is always more evident that the "fruits" of all these crosses are becoming more and more evident every single breeding season.

7)....If more people did more in-depth studying on snakes, they would become MUCH more aware of exactly what the heck they are looking at anyway, but this seems to be basic human nature, to not bother learning a whole lot(because it takes too much time and effort), but yet still want to jump into breeding them with both feet without really KNOWING anything about snakes first, and the many key differences.

8)...BTW,....this year will produce who knows HOW MANY more countless crosses into the hobby to pass on their unknown genetics to whatever the heck they are bred with as well.

These are just a few very valid reasons,...I could go on and on, but don't see a real need to.

~Doug
-----
"a snake in the grass is a GOOD thing"

my website -serpentinespecialties.webs.com

RickGordon May 05, 2010 11:19 PM

"1)....Is that surprising that so many don't know what they are actually getting?,...(answer)..no, actually, it is only inevitable that this happens quite often."

They are getting a snake. A captive bred and therefore unnatural specimen. that will be true no matter how you document the blood line.

"2)....and what about all the babies that are created from these already "un-known" crosses?,....and their babies babies, and so on forever. AND what are they even being bred with? "

Other captive bred unnatural snakes. I agree that it would be great to have a lineage, I recommend that you document your snakes and only buy from people who do so you can be specific about the gene pool your snake comes from. But even if every documented everything there would still be people who choose a different gene pool then one that you like to each their own.

3)....many people that acquire these un-knowns, or ANY snakes for that matter aren't very experienced at all with snake identification, or have ANY meristical identifying experience, so they will call any of these un-known crossed snakes whatever they think they tend to best represent at the time. Then of course SOLD as such too.

They are what they are,captive bred unnatural snakes. If they can't tell the difference and the people who buy them can't tell the difference then what does it matter? Your afraid that their unnatural snakes will be mixed in some unnoticable way with your unnatural snakes?

"4)....what do the buyer's of ALL THESE UN-KNOWN SNAKES DO???

yes!,....they breed them of course,....and to what exactly??"

Other captive bred unnatural snakes you seem to be unable to get beyond this point in your logic.

"5)....and THIS is the real irony of all this. If people didn't cross stuff all the time, nobody would even be seeing this issue CONSTANTLY being talked about, now would they??..LOL!"
Thats like saying if everyone agreed with me I wouldn't disagree with them, it's a nonsensical point.

"6)....The fact that it has already been done for so long, it is always more evident that the "fruits" of all these crosses are becoming more and more evident every single breeding season."

The fact is that all captive breeding is unnatural the only way to preserve the natural snake is to preserve nature, everything we take out of it becomes tainted because we have removed it from the natural selection process.

"7)....If more people did more in-depth studying on snakes, they would become MUCH more aware of exactly what the heck they are looking at anyway, but this seems to be basic human nature, to not bother learning a whole lot(because it takes too much time and effort), but yet still want to jump into breeding them with both feet without really KNOWING anything about snakes first, and the many key differences."

Like with anything else, wines, beers, etc. There will always be disagreements over what is best it's just a matter of taste. Your preference for Chateau Lafite is not diminshed by someone elses taste for mad dog 20/20.

"8)...BTW,....this year will produce who knows HOW MANY more countless crosses into the hobby to pass on their unknown genetics to whatever the heck they are bred with as well."

Eventually, quite soon, we will have genetically engineered snakes to add to the list, imagine a kingsnake that have been give a growth gene from burmese python. Or a glow in the dark Garter snake that has been give a gene for the FGP protien, this is already being done with amphibians and tropical fish.

"These are just a few very valid reasons,...I could go on and on, but don't see a real need to."

I haven't heard any valid arguments yet, just your personal taste which is fine. Your welcome to like what you like, that doesn't make someone elses likes evil or bad. No one will force you to buy a hybrid. It's up to you and people like you to maintain and document the gene pool your trying to create. others will choose to preserve and document other gene pools some simply won't care at all, there is room in this hobby for all the snakes just as their is room for blue label and Heiniken.

JKruse May 06, 2010 12:12 AM

This mentality is very concerning. Must be a FR disciple, as it's the same bullsh*t Frank would feed us while meandering on for miles in support of hybrids/crosses. Probably also from Texas too as this mentality seems to run more rampant down there. But very very sad indeed that we'd need to justify why breeding like species/ssp is the most appropriate and ethical thing to do for various reasons. It's the shallow few who view reptiles as aeshetic items and care less about their integrity when reproducing them in captivity.

I don't know how the word "natural" got all chopped up, but it's obviously a means to an end to support hybrids/crosses. Sure it's not natural to line breed and select mates in blanket boxes, but at the VERY least breed like species/ssp to like species/ssp. Keep them what they are for crissakes and stop with the ridiculous rationalizations to hybridize/cross snakes that weren't meant to be bred together.

I'm sure this will wet yer underoos.......


Image" alt="Image">
-----
Jerry Kruse
www.zonatas.com

And God said, "Let there be zonata subspecies for all to ponder..."

DMong May 06, 2010 03:02 AM

I knew I was wasting my time.

What an absolute load of CRAP!!

See, problem is, your "radiator moonshine" mentality is ruining all the champagne pal.

BTW, what's with all the "natural/unnatural" talk??, I am talking GENUINE SPECIES, AND SUBSPECIES DUDE!!!!!!!!, not five-way mutt crosses!

Years, and years later, my snakes are STILL THE SAME SUBSPECIES!!for all to enjoy, and know what the hell they are.

yeah,............still doesn't compute yet, does it?..HAHAHAA!
-----
"a snake in the grass is a GOOD thing"

my website -serpentinespecialties.webs.com

RickGordon May 06, 2010 10:56 PM

In the end your "genuine" species or subspecies is still an unnatural captive bred snake. The integrity of your blood line is whatever you choose it to be, what does it matter you choose to keep to one species and someone else chooses multiple? Maybe your definition of "integrity" mean that they come from the same species, someone else might choose a specific locale and another person may simply be consider "integrity" to be a snake with no Gold fish genes injected into it. In the end they are all man-made snakes, no one better then the other, accept for personal taste. I have not seen any argument here to contradict that.

DMong May 07, 2010 12:10 AM

"I have not seen any argument here to contradict that"

Only because you refuse to "see" it. And because of this hobby fad that seems so widespread, years from now most snakes in collections will simply be a big mixture of un-known garbage that nobody has a single clue as to what the genetics are, instead of snakes of an actual specific type to carry on for future enjoyment for people to be able to own down the road that want to enjoy them.

See, if you don't understand what I have been saying all this time, of course you cannot see why this is so important. You are too focused on telling me my points have no validity.

It is no different than taking an entire car lot of nice classic cars, and then swap all of their parts with aftermarket parts. The parts might be nice and shiny, but you just destroyed the main attributes and qualities of all the cars.

In any case, this isn't something that can be argued, but rather it is something you just cannot understand I guess.

Anyway, I think I am about done here with this, because if this isn't understood by now, I could make posts until Mothers Day of next year, and it will still be a complete waste of my time anyway, and the main substance will never be comprehended.

BTW,.......Have fun with your future project "glow-in-the-dark" genetically altered, Beta fish five-way crosses!. And what types will you start with??, wouldn't that sweet little example project have to START with two known types of some sort??..HAHAHAHAA!

~Doug
-----
"a snake in the grass is a GOOD thing"

my website -serpentinespecialties.webs.com

RickGordon May 09, 2010 11:34 PM

The automobile analogy is good example, you just miss the fact that there are people who restore to original parts and people that buy after market and one doesn't stop the other. Also the analogy fails when you realize that a restored car can have all the original parts, but a captive bred snake is more like a replica car then an original. It's traits are chosen to replicate the natural species rather then actually be natural.

RG May 04, 2010 07:05 PM

6.6 African House snakes
3.2 reticulated pythons
0.1 corn snake
4.2 Florida Kings
1.2 speckled kings
1.2 ball pythons
0.0.1 Argentine boa

Just change your signature block to this:

15.15.1 snakes

Get it?????????????????????????????????????

-R

JKruse May 04, 2010 08:10 PM

now THAT was powerful.......allow me to electronically shake your hand sir. Awesome.
-----
Jerry Kruse
www.zonatas.com

And God said, "Let there be zonata subspecies for all to ponder..."

markg May 03, 2010 08:49 PM

Regarding the inbreeding arguement - different animals will show different effects. Many kingsnakes for example are by nature "clannish" if you will - they can occupy an area and interbreed - w/o problem. I see that in local Cal king populations near me, because they occupy pockets of suitable habitat surrounded by less favorable habitat called houses and roads. Perhaps in flatter desert areas, the Cal kings have no need to be clannish, where the habitat is the same in a large expanse. True of sidewinders.

Mate selection may involve chemical cues (queues - which is it?) whereby individuals of different minor genetic features may be attracted to one another. That is the unfortunate thing -we deny this in captivity - we typically do not allow the snake to select a mate from multiple animals. This has been experimented with by some big name folks and by others too, often with very good results in robustness of the young.

Anyway, as unnatural as captivity may be, it is nice to do the best we can to keep a close approximation of what the wild counterpart would look/act like.
-----
Mark

JKruse May 04, 2010 03:22 PM

EXCELLENT answer as the point is delivered clearly and in a soft manner.....I have the very same sentiments, but I may come across a bit more brash (unintentionally) because I am passionate about maintaining their integrity. Whatever has taken eons to create should, by ethical standards, be kept that way. Granted, we do tinker to a more or less degree in captivity with genetics and creating morphs (which I'm not too crazy about either) however at least at the end of the day it's still a Cal king (as an example). I feel it's wrong to intentionally hybridize or cross something that wasnt meant to be. But again, nice delivery in making the point.
-----
Jerry Kruse
www.zonatas.com

And God said, "Let there be zonata subspecies for all to ponder..."

markg May 04, 2010 05:12 PM

Muchas gracias Jerry for that. I understand your passion BTW. Down the road (and for the next generation of herpers) we all will be glad if we maintain integrity of the animals as best as captivity allows us.
-----
Mark

RickGordon May 05, 2010 11:28 PM

"integrity" in captive bred snakes is a delusion, a harmful one, because those that believe that nature is preserved in the captive bred animal do not fully understand the value of nature. We cannot and do not preserve nature by captive breeding the only way are children will ever be able to see a what a real cornsnake or kingsnake looks like is to see one in the wild. Lets hope we keep some it around for them!

JKruse May 06, 2010 12:19 AM

It is not NATURE that is being preserved Rick!!!!!!!!!!! Jesus H. Christ, what he hell do you keep babbling on for about this "nature" nonsense?!?!?!? WE ARE TALKING ABOUT PRESERVING WHAT A SNAKE IS SUPPOSED TO LOOK LIKE, NOT CROSSING IT INTO SOMETHING THAT WOULD NEVER HAPPEN IN THE NATURAL WORLD......like a gopher snake and a European grass snake.....ITS JUST NOT MEANT TO BE. What the hell don't you get about that dude?

In the end just say you think hybrids are great and you promote it so we can be done with the conversation....but you keep babbling about "natural" which I don't know why you're killing that word to defend your obvious penchant for hybrids. DAMN! Of course captive-breeding isnt "natural", which I've illustrated SEVERAL times at this point. IT'S ABOUT KEEPING A SPECIES/SUB-SPECIES WHAT IT IS.

Capiche?
-----
Jerry Kruse
www.zonatas.com

And God said, "Let there be zonata subspecies for all to ponder..."

RickGordon May 06, 2010 11:07 PM

" WE ARE TALKING ABOUT PRESERVING WHAT A SNAKE IS SUPPOSED TO LOOK LIKE, NOT CROSSING IT INTO SOMETHING THAT WOULD NEVER HAPPEN IN THE NATURAL WORLD......like a gopher snake and a European grass snake.....ITS JUST NOT MEANT TO BE. What the hell don't you get about that dude?
"

What I don't get is how breeding a specific "Species" differs from that. 99% of your captive bred snakes would never survive to breeding age in the wild, so it is just likely to "NEVER HAPPEN IN THE REAL WORLD." And the fact is that if two different species of snakes can reproduce then they are so genetically similar as to barely be distinguished as different species. Which means that at one time in the not too distant past they were one species. So in reality it's not really correct to say it would never happen in nature. And I don't get how someone choosing to create a frankensnake inhibits your ability to maintain a pure blood line. Don't buy their snakes, it is as simple as that.

JKruse May 08, 2010 12:36 AM

Maybe you can try -- I just don't have the strength tonight after my daughter's 8-hour birthday party..........and honestly I feel like i'm trying to understand a foreign language at this point:

Rick said:

"What I don't get is how breeding a specific "Species" differs from that. 99% of your captive bred snakes would never survive to breeding age in the wild, so it is just likely to "NEVER HAPPEN IN THE REAL WORLD." And the fact is that if two different species of snakes can reproduce then they are so genetically similar as to barely be distinguished as different species. Which means that at one time in the not too distant past they were one species. So in reality it's not really correct to say it would never happen in nature. And I don't get how someone choosing to create a frankensnake inhibits your ability to maintain a pure blood line. Don't buy their snakes, it is as simple as that."

I would love to take a mass poll to determine just how many people across the board think in this manner. It's more than concerning.
-----
Jerry Kruse
www.zonatas.com

And God said, "Let there be zonata subspecies for all to ponder..."

StevenOrndorff May 08, 2010 07:48 AM

It sounds to me like Mr. Gordon feels we shouldn't keep snakes at all. If snakes in captivity bothers him so much i am puzzled as to why he frequents this forum. I don't know that hybrids in some collections hurt the comunity since a great deal of keepers don't ever breed their snakes. But anyone who is going to breed should try to keep to the original plan. Unfortanatly many people don't understand why or they just don't care. The most we can do is keep to our own standards and hope others don't muddy the waters too much

RickGordon May 08, 2010 10:49 PM

Its not that I don't like keeping snakes, I have kept hundreds of species myself, a claim few here can make I am sure. What I have is a clear and realistic understanding of what captive breeding is, and isn't. It is a means of providing herps to the pet trade. It's a positive alternative, environmentally to keeping wild-caught. It is not a noahs ark preserving natural lineages. Captive bred snakes are removed from the natural selection and can not be released into the wild without doing harm to natural populations. Being that this is true there really is no reason to value one blood line over another, accept for personal taste, which is fine and in matters of personal taste everyone is entitled to theirs, there is no justification for claiming the higher moral ground.

JKruse May 09, 2010 01:14 PM

what is the justification for claiming the lower moral ground? You make these amazing creatures sound worthless as a pure species/sub-species.
-----
Jerry Kruse
www.zonatas.com

And God said, "Let there be zonata subspecies for all to ponder..."

RickGordon May 09, 2010 11:26 PM

I find them Morally worthless, my argument is a against the claims that another blood line is "wrong" Such a claim implies a moral high ground. I don't see it. Personally I have never owned a hybrid snake, mainly because I have never seen one that looked as good as each species seperately. Also I would not mix a corn with king, just because it seems a little confusing to mix predator with prey, but that's just my personal taste. I would not say that people that like hybrids are wrong, or evil, or doing something harmful to the hobby, it just isn't true. If there is a high horse to get on in this hobby. It is with those that choose to breed and buy captive bred over wild-caught, regardless of bloodline.

JKruse May 10, 2010 04:19 PM

But Rick, the intrinsic beauty of captive propagation is relieving the strain of lowering wild populations via capturing for personal reasons (mainly financial gain). Of course there's nothing horribly wrong with taking SOME wild blood within reason, but that is generally case-specific and as long as it's not rampant there should be no ill-effect.

But then to intentionally hybridize? WHY? FOR WHAT PURPOSE? It makes no sense and to many is irresponsible not solely for the act of doing it, but more so for the bastardized specimens that make their way into the hobby and inevitably become mis-represented. That in and of itself is damaging. Because honestly, if I grew fed up with having to constantly question the legitimacy and integrity of a captive bred "something", naturally i'd go and find my own wild specimen/s or have someone get it for me. It's the law of supply and demand in a way. I just don't understand why you can't see it from that perspective.

You say calling it "wrong" is wrong, well then what the hell wouldja call it?!?!? What do you think that person that ALWAYS winds up on one of these forums asking "is this what it's supposed to be?" is feeling? I'm sure VERY upset and maybe even angry about the whole process. The root of the problem is the intentional crossing of two snakes that were never meant to be together in the first place. It mucks it all up in several different ways, and that's not okay. Yeah, it IS mostly a human-needs generated issue as the snakes may've cared less if they were the same species/ssp when mating.......but there's also some amount of human responsibility to each other in the hobby as well.

As for breeding "purely", it is a judgment call on that person whether or not a Cal king should be kept a Cal king, and not crossed with something it would never encouter in the wild. It's gross human negligence on the part of the incredible integrity of the biological creation of the species/ssp itself to go and muck it all up because some just think it's cool looking. Through selective propagation we play God poorly enough, but then to go and make these abominations is just outright ridiculous and unnecessary. Furthermore it places unnecessary burden for the majority of folks that want their snakes "pure" (in terms of species/ssp) and have to even think that there may something "other than" in the blood. Although it may be an unintended consequence of human curiosity from some time ago, we ARE indeed seeing the negative effects of such on-going captive practices.
-----
Jerry Kruse
www.zonatas.com

And God said, "Let there be zonata subspecies for all to ponder..."

StevenOrndorff May 10, 2010 04:43 PM

I just like KNOWING what i own. It doesn't help that i keep mostly venomous. If I get bit do i need hybrid antivenin?

RickGordon May 11, 2010 09:32 PM

I agree with that, but we are really talking about two seperate issues, the first being hybrization and the second being record keeping. I certainly agree that a person who documents his/her bloodlines is morally better then someone who doesn't.

RickGordon May 11, 2010 09:36 PM

Think about it, relieving the strain of on wild populations is also achieved by creating demand for snakes that can only be found in captivity, maybe even more so. Again I am not against your preference, I just don't think it is wrong for someone to choose differently.

JKruse May 12, 2010 03:08 PM

"Think about it, relieving the strain of on wild populations is also achieved by creating demand for snakes that can only be found in captivity, maybe even more so."

So this is the hybridization defense? LOL. I'm just trying to understand you Rick......that's all.
-----
Jerry Kruse
www.zonatas.com

And God said, "Let there be zonata subspecies for all to ponder..."

Site Tools