I understand and agree with you.
I'll even say this:
When Florida made their ROC laws stating that, in order to keep a burm (retic, etc.), you had to pass a written test to get a special license, every animal had to be microchipped after a certain size and tagged to their individual owner. That way, if that snake turned up in a parking lot somewhere, authorities could trace the animal back to the owner. The owners are subject to facility inspection. I don't keep ROCs and Fish and I'm subject to inspection.
When these rules came out, I'll admit, I supported them. They came from the reptile community. Many of our industry keaders worked with Fish and Wildlife to create them.
I completely believe many reptile keepers are not capable of keeping burmese pythons. I thought it was sad that we as an industry couldn't hold it together enough to prevent the incidents that had been happening around that time, but understood that something had to be done. There were a few incidents resulting from people handling pythons by themselves. I believe you should not handle a 15 foot retic without another person. If you do, that's a husbandry error. For a few keepers, it turned to to be fatal and some sort of legislation was understandable.
My problem lies with this:
I believe all of these rules were stated that keepers had to be in compliance by July 2008. I felt we had made a fair compromise. However, it wold take a little while for everything to "set in" and take effect.
Unfortunately, within 6 months, national legislation was being considered for an all out ban. Now, less than two years later, the FL House and Senate have ramrodded new legislation banning the ownership of ROCs as pets.
What I mean is that we compromised and our plan was never allowed a chance to work. I feel that, instead of viewing our compromise as Herpers being receptive to other view points and to change, it was viewed as weakness. I feel betrayed about this. They asked, we answered and they did what they wanted anyway. The have shown me that, if we compromise, they'll take it further than we agree. Give them and inch and they'll want a mile. Now I find myself thinking like the NRA: no compromise.
We already HAVE the licensing laws you describe in effect, Let's just give them a chance to work. Enforce them better if you want. Every year, I tell FL Fish and Wildlife what I have, how many of them there are and where I have them on my renewal application. I am proud to participate. I comply with the rules and regulations set out by Florida. In my opinion, up to this point, FL Fish and Wildlife seems pretty reasonable.
Anyway, sorry for the length of this post. I just want to know that, if we agree upon a solution, our agreement will be honored. I want the decisions and opinions of our industry leaders honored. I remember that many people spent at least MONTHS if not years of their free time meeting with FFW to come up with these rules changes and they were completely disregarded 6 months later.
Accreditation by USARK?
I'm open to that. USARK is made up of reptile keepers and know what it means to house a burmese python. They are US.
An all out ban of all interstate commerce created by people that mostly have never owned reptiles?
Sounds to me like someone's not listening again.
See what I mean?
Thanks for your response.
Aaron
-----
www.voodoomagicboas.com