Reptile & Amphibian Forums

Welcome to kingsnake.com's message board system. Here you may share and discuss information with others about your favorite reptile and amphibian related topics such as care and feeding, caging requirements, permits and licenses, and more. Launched in 1997, the kingsnake.com message board system is one of the oldest and largest systems on the internet.

Click here to visit Classifieds
https://www.crepnw.com/
Click here to visit Classifieds

OH- Ohio Animal Welfare Agreement

EricWI Jun 30, 2010 05:35 PM

COLUMBUS, Ohio — A deal struck between The Humane Society of the United States, Ohioans for Humane Farms, Ohio agriculture leaders and Ohio Gov. Ted Strickland will lead to major animal welfare improvements in Ohio on a raft of issues, reforming industry practices and improving prospects for adoption of critical legislation in other areas. The agreement puts a hold on a planned factory farming initiative on the fall ballot.

"I'm grateful to Governor Strickland and his administration for their outstanding leadership on these issues," said Wayne Pacelle, HSUS president and CEO. Pacelle appeared with Gov. Strickland and Ohio Farm Bureau Executive Vice President Jack Fisher at a press conference to announce the agreement. "This agreement moves us forward on all of the components of the proposed ballot measure as well as other important advances for animals, too. I look forward to working with the Legislature and the Livestock Care Board to see these reforms adopted."

The agreement includes recommendations from all of the parties for the Ohio Livestock Care Standards Care Board, the Legislature, and the Governor to adopt the following provisions:

* A ban on veal crates by 2017, which is the same timing as the ballot measure.
* A ban on new gestation crates in the state after Dec. 31, 2010. Existing facilities are grandfathered, but must cease use of these crates within 15 years.
* A moratorium on permits for new battery cage confinement facilities for laying hens.
* A ban on strangulation of farm animals and mandatory humane euthanasia methods for sick or injured animals.
* A ban on the transport of downer cows for slaughter.
* Enactment of a legislation establishing felony-level penalties for cockfighters.
* Enactment of legislation cracking down on puppy mills.
* Enactment of a ban on the acquisition of dangerous exotic animals as pets, such as primates, bears, lions, tigers, large constricting and venomous snakes, crocodiles and alligators.

"Ohioans should be proud that our state will be implementing these meaningful animal welfare reforms, and I am extremely grateful to all the Ohio animal advocates who gathered signatures to make this day possible," said John Dinon, executive director of the Toledo Area Humane Society and president of the board of directors of Ohioans for Humane Farms. "Although I am a bit disappointed that action on battery cages will be delayed due to the compromise reached today, I still consider this a great victory for Ohio's animals and animal advocates."

"These reforms represent important progress for farm animals and other animals in Ohio, and we're grateful to all our volunteers in Ohio who worked so hard to make this happen," said Gene Baur, president of Farm Sanctuary.

Ohio is one of only 11 states that do not have a felony law against cockfighting. The relatively meager penalties have made the state a safe haven for cockfighters from nearby states, and hampered law enforcement efforts to crack down on the illegal activity. The legislation, H.B. 108, passed the House and is awaiting a vote in a Senate committee.

The HSUS reached the agreement with the Ohio Farm Bureau and other agricultural commodity groups on the same day Ohioans for Humane Farms would have delivered more than 500,000 signatures to the Secretary of State. The group gathered enough signatures to put an anti-factory farming measure before Ohio voters in November.

"We are grateful to the Ohio volunteers who put tremendous energy towards the effort to gather enough signatures to place the measure on the ballot," said Pacelle. "Their effort led to this agreement that moves the ball forward on all those reforms while leading the state to address other serious animal welfare concerns and avoiding a costly and contentious campaign."

Replies (13)

wireptile Jun 30, 2010 06:03 PM

The Farm Bureau sold out the pet industry to save itself from HSUS.
Expect to see this as a national trend.
Lets sell all of our herps now while it is still legal and go on welfare.

jscrick Jun 30, 2010 06:50 PM

This is really bad news, indeed. I had suggested some time back we hitch our wagon to the agriculture industry in order to give us more clout. We certainly cannot allow them to continue to throw us under the bus.
jsc
-----
"As hard as I've tried, just can't NOT do this"
John Crickmer

wireptile Jun 30, 2010 07:37 PM

With this sort of thing going on all over the nation, is it possible for all of us who are affected by this HSUS/State and Local Government collusion to find a law firm that would file a class-action lawsuit against HSUS and the States for damages of destroying our hobbys and livelihoods? Any legal minds out there that have any ideas on this?

webwheeler Jun 30, 2010 08:34 PM

I'm not a lawyer, but I certainly do feel defamed.

EricWI Jun 30, 2010 10:44 PM
webwheeler Jul 01, 2010 01:07 AM

Yep. It certainly looks and sounds like the Governor and agribusiness in Ohio has thrown pet owners under the HSUS bus.

EricWI Jul 01, 2010 08:45 PM

This comes from the actual agreement. Sound like extortion to anyone else?

"The HSUS will not submit a constitutional amendment on animal welfare in 2010 to the Ohio Secretary of State. Failure to implement the provisions related to wild and dangerous animals or the reforms recommended to the OLCSB by December 31, 2010 could void the agreement and allow the HSUS to pursue a ballot initiative whenever it chooses. However, if the terms of this agreement are met and implemented to the satisfaction of all parties, the agreement will extend to January 1, 2014. At that time the agreement shall be extended through January 1, 2017, and subsequently through January 1, 2020, if the terms continue to be met, and no party shall reasonably withhold its consent to the extensions."

jscrick Jul 01, 2010 10:10 PM

I read it. Extortion yes. Quid pro quo...we're just a bargaining chip.
Disgusting. I don't see how they can hold up Government like that and get away with it.
Ohio must be WEAK!!!
jsc
-----
"As hard as I've tried, just can't NOT do this"
John Crickmer

natsamjosh Jul 01, 2010 10:49 PM

Weak? Sounds more like corrupt to me. The whole thing makes no sense, given pet ownership has nothing to do with farming or agriculture. And since when did extortion become a *good* thing?

CSRAJim Jul 02, 2010 08:28 AM

Natsamjosh,

>>given pet ownership has nothing to do with farming or agriculture…

Unfortunately, it does. From the Endangered Species Act (ESA), it is clear that one of intents of the ESA was to regulate the commerce of commodities…Which by definition are agricultural and mining products traded on a market. In addition to the animals themselves as part of the ESA regulation, this includes EVERY PRODUCT DERIVED FROM THEM. This includes meat, eggs, leather, etc…So by regulation (ESA), it has everything to do with farming and agriculture.

Additionally, the AR agenda (of which the ESA clearly is) in total can be summed up in this article (link below)…

http://www.njabr.org/programs/animal_rights/

An excerpt from the article above is as follows...

>>The basic "platform" of animal rights calls for the end to all human "exploitation" of animals - this includes, but is not limited to:

>>Use of animals and animal products for human or animal dietary consumption (meat and dairy)

>>Confinement livestock and poultry production

>>Hunting, trapping, and fishing

>>Fur-farming

>>Use of animals in cosmetic and product-safety testing

>>The practice of owning pets

>>Use of animals and animal products in clothing and domestic products (wool, fur, leather, silk)

>>Use of animals for any medical or veterinary research or procedure

>>Zoos, circuses, rodeos, horseshows, and dog-shows

>>All performing animals

>>Guide-dogs for the blind

>>Police dogs and search and rescue dogs

The AR crowd are nothing more than the PR wing of the ESA bureaucrats with the agenda of granting "human rights" to animals...They are both different "trees" of the same "regulatory" forest. As different "trees", they each have different roles to play in the accomplishment of the same agenda (regulatory forest).

Later,
Jim.

PS: The pet trade is commerce in an agricultural commodity which THEY deem as inappropriate (by philosophy) and thus, seek to ban it.

-----
CSRAJim

webwheeler Jul 02, 2010 10:15 AM

Yep. I agree, Jim. It's looking like our only real chance of defending against this HSUS squeeze play will be in the courts. And, I believe HSUS will use this tactic again, in other states, in the future.

natsamjosh Jul 02, 2010 11:05 AM

Jim,

Thanks for the information. I think I understand the ar agenda, what makes no sense to me is that private agricultural organizations can "agree" to pet rules. How is that legally binding? Why not just throw in gun control laws into the "agreement?"

Thanks,
Ed

CSRAJim Jul 02, 2010 12:33 PM

Ed,

>>Thanks for the information. I think I understand the ar agenda, what makes no sense to me is that private agricultural organizations can "agree" to pet rules. How is that legally binding? Why not just throw in gun control laws into the "agreement?"

First, you are welcome…

Next, I don’t know…Here’s a recommendation, can you research this and post what you find out? I’m willing to bet that what you find out will open your eyes somewhat…

Regarding gun control laws I’m certain that if they could get away with it, they would but they’re not there yet…

Hope this helps…
Jim.

-----
CSRAJim

Site Tools