From the uv meter group:
> Should the 10.0 bulb give higher output?
That is the funny thing about percentage 
10.0 means 10% of the output is uvb.
So if a lamp has a total radiative output of 9W (which is reasonable
for a 23W tube), of which 3W are UVA and 0.6W are UVB than the lamp has
0.06W/9W*100% = 6.7% UVB (and 30% UVA)
If you now choose to use a less efficient visible phosphor and only get
a total output 6W instead of 9W you end with 0.06W/6W*100% = 10%.
Magic - without increasing the amount of uvb you changed the tube from
6.7% UVB to 10% UVB.
What do we learn from that? Percentage of UV does only tell you
something about the relative distribution of energy in the spectrum of
the light. It does not tell you anything about intensities.
If you keep in mind that tubes only emit visible and uv radiation but no
infrared and you calculate the percantage of uv from the sun on this
basis (not taking the full spectrum of the sun as a reference but only
the visible and uv radiation) you get something between 0.1% to 0.8%.
Skylight at noon on the other hand has something like 2.5% UVB.
So fluorescent lamps generally have a very unbalanced spectrum with far
too little visible light. Apart from their colour their amount of uvb
matches more closely skylight than sunlight (as does their homogenious
distribution of light in space).
This is a very good question! 
Firstly, the 5.0 and 10.0 were first devised to indicate, roughly, the percentage (5% and 10%) of UVB from the lamp - as a percentage of total UV plus visible light. It is a fairly pointless figure. And as Sarina points out, this can be manipulated - intentionally or otherwise - simply by altering the amount of visible light.
This was started with fluorescent tubes... So the early production boxes had printed on them something like: 5%UVB 30%UVA (and therefore, they were supposed to be 65% visible light).
What happened then, was that these figures became "legendary" and everyone started putting 5% or 5.0, and later, when stronger phosphor blends were used, 10% and 10.0.
Some lamps - such as the ZooMed and Arcadia ones - did actually match these percentages reasonably well..(and still do, for the TUBES at least. I tested some ZooMed Reptisun tubes last year and the figures from the spectral analysis were:
5.0 tubes - UVB 6.3% UVA 22.8% visible 71.2%
10.0 tubes - UVB 9.1% UVB 23.7% visible 67.4%
The figures have been rounded to one decimal place so don't add up to exactly 100%)
Some other companies have not matched the figures with anything like as much accuracy. As phosphors are changed, the percentages - especially of UVA- vary. Most lamps have nothing like 30% UVA nowadays... and the amount of visible light has also altered a lot, since many tubes now have tri-phosphors instead of the older halophosphate.
However... once you get on to the compact lamps the 10.0 and 5.0 names become just names. It's very unlikely that a compact lamp will be 5% or 10% UVB, because compact lamps have much more intense visible light, for a start.
The other problem is that ZooMed have been changing their specs over the last couple of years.
I suspect that your Reptisun 5.0 Compact Lamp is the older specification (this has a phosphor with a much higher proportion of its output in the shorter wavelengths) whereas your Reptisun 10.0 Compact Lamp is one of the new generation, which has a much safer spectrum, closer to that of natural sunlight in the UVB range.
Here are the percentages from some of the Reptisun compacts from both "generations"..
OLD TYPE Reptisun 5.0 Compact: UVB 9.5% UVA 11.2% Visible 79.5%
OLD TYPE Reptisun 10.0 Compact: UVB 25.9% UVA 23.5% Visible 51%
NEW TYPE Reptisun 5.0 Compact: UVB 3.9% UVA 10.9% Visible 85.2%
NEW TYPE Reptisun 10.0 Compact: UVB 6.3% UVA 16.5% Visible 77.2%
Now, lets move on to your Solarmeter 6.2 readings.
The Solarmeter 6.2 reads the total UVB - a broad band of wavelengths, that includes some longer wavelengths that are "safe" but produce only a little vitamin D3; middle wavelengths which produce good vitamin D3, and very short wavelengths which do produce D3 but which also are much more hazardous and can burn skin and eyes.
The old-type Reptisun compacts produce much more of the very short wavelengths. They give higher readings on the Solarmeters - but the UVB is not as "safe". (The UVB from the old-type 10.0 compacts was so 'strong' in brand new lamps that at close range it caused harm, in fact.)
This is why ZooMed changed to a safer specification. Their new generation of lamps give lower meter readings; but the light does not contain any of the hazardous, very-short-wavelength UVB which is not found in natural sunlight.
I've had a look at my own readings; those of Kevin's (great photos on your post, Kevin) and yours, Louis...
Kevin's readings are from tubes, so this makes direct comparison rather difficult.
Louis - how did you take your readings? Were they from the side of the compact lamp, (ie. with the lamp not in a dome) or were they from underneath, ie. with the lamp hanging down, and the meter aimed up at the "end" of the lamp? Or was the lamp inside a dome, and measured from below?
All these will make a lot of difference to the readings.
Here are my readings from a new-style Reptisun 10 Compact at 12", after 105hrs of use:
from the side - 25uW/cm2
from below - 9 uW/cm2
from below in ZooMed "deep dome" - 20uW/cm2
The requirements of different species are best met by trying to re-create the species' favoured micro-habitat in the vivarium. So if you know where the animal lives in the wild, and its basking habits (or not as the case may be) you can judge its likely choice of UVB exposure (eg. basking in morning sun only; never basking; sitting in full sun at any time of day; getting small amounts of sunlight filtering into its daytime sleeping position..etc)and a basic concept is to provide a similar gradient (from the maximum naturally chosen when basking, to virtually zero in the animal's sheltered area)so the reptile can freely decide what UVB it obtains.
But the lamp you choose will depend as much upon the size and type of housing, and its heating arrangements, as upon the species' requirements. You can't use a mercury vapour lamp, obviously, over a tiny vivarium and it's very impractical to use a fluorescent tube for sun-basking species in a large enclosure....
The other difficulty is in using the intensity in uW/cm2 (eg. as given by the Solarmeter 6.2) as the tool for choosing your lamp. Because all lamps have different spectra, if you have even two very similar lamps (eg two fluorescent tubes) giving readings of, say, 100uW/cm2 these lamps may have a completely different vitamin D3-producing potential from each other and from 100uW/cm2 of sunlight.
But there are ways round this.


