Now I have seen my share of hypo brooks. When they first came out maybe Flame was a differentiation between the reds and yellow hypos...but werent Flames there as a normal phase?? Arent they still? Just because a flame bred to a flame doesnt mean all the babies are flames right?? As selective breeding gets more refined everyone is "extreme" this and that(to make sales)....and some are and some just arent. There have been some posted here recently that are killer! Others not so much. Yet this is yet another reason I am not fond of the "Flame" and "Sulfer" and a few other "non-recessive genes". There is nothing stopping anyone from putting any name on any snake. There are extreme ends of any normal morph right? Or am I wrong again?? Ball pythons? As always, I may be unpopular, but at this point I'm attempting to be a centrist. I post this to try and avoid the "extreme extreme extreme hypo on fire in your face supre red" morph. Opinions are great, but since when are genes opinions??





LOL!




