Chad as you know Stan Chiras and I are good friends.
Last October in Tinley Park You and I had a discussion about female deserts and at that time you were aware of the situation surrounding Stan's breeding efforts, We talked about Stan loosing his female. One of the concerns we talked about was if female deserts stayed on the small side... they would tend
to have a higher percentage of becoming egg bound.
The way I see it.. as of today (7/23/2010) no one to the best of my knowledge has produced any offspring from a female desert or female desert cross.
I believe until breeders have better results (and not just one example here or there) the best we can hope for is: Female deserts (and female crosses) will just need more time to reach reproductive size / maturity.. But! until then.. Yes, there are
issues and in no way would I look at a female desert or female desert cross as a good breeding investment.
Over the last month I have talked with breeders who have been advertising desert stock for sale. I was not surprised to see that none of them had a female that produced a clutch, I was surprised the vast majority had no knowledge of desert females becoming egg bound, staying a smaller size, or needing more
time to reach a reproductive size.
Chad you have known me for a long time, It has been over twenty years since Brian Ree sp. brought you over to see my collection. I remember how impressed you were with my collection of Boas and Pythons and the offspring I was producing at that time.
Chad now that I am working with a few different Ball python morphs please in future correspondence give me the benefit of the doubt! I see no need for your carom shot in using a 245# lineman as an example, After all I see a big difference in a warm blooded 245 # lineman and a 1200 gram cold blooded snake. Maybe using an example of one snake being breed to another
smaller subspecies that produced a viable clutch would have been more appropriate.
Regards,
Daniel