-----------------------------------------------
"I am not throwing anyone under the bus at al."
-----------------------------------------------
By saying Ric had ONE mix up in ONE of his lines, which had nothing to do with another, all of sudden this means ALL of his lines are mixed up (River Road, Christmas, Sanderson, Black Gap, etc, etc). With that, you are indeed throwing him under the bus. I believe he did have 1 mix up, that doesn't mean all of his lines are now screwed up, it just means there was a mistake in ONE line.
----------------------------------------------
"The fact is, as people buy these mixed up blood line (by accident of course lol) people have bought them, breed them or brokered the animals out, this further makes the blood lines tainted."
----------------------------------------------
The point I've been trying to make is that you are assuming they are ALL mixed up. I am assuming they are not. I contend that each person, along with each line deserves it's own background check. I start with the person, if they are known to be unscrupulous breeders, I write off their entire group, regardless the line, I do not bother with them. If the breeder passes scrutiny and is known for being a straight shooter, I move on to the background check of the animal. Just because a good breeder has one mishap does not mean I personally feel I need to write them off. If you operate differently, good for you. The problem I have with so quickly writing someone off is that MOST people did not keep absolute records from the original wild caught. Even if you can trace it back, it means nothing since you were not there to see it yourself. At some point, you have to factor into the equation much more than absolutes because you simply are not going to have them in 99.9% of the hobby. There are an incredible amount of variable you need to plug into the equation in order to ascertain whether or not the line in question is good. With this, comes a lot of gray area. You are suggesting that the answer is either black or it is white. I do not agree.
------------------------------------------
"Eventually at the rate we are going we will have very honest to goodness viable strains."
------------------------------------------
What?!
------------------------------------------
"Dont just say well so and so got bad blood lines from billy bob but i know my stuff is pure from billy bob. Fact is a shadow is now cast on animals from billy bob!!!!!!! So if you further breed billy bobs snakes as pure, you are doing nothing more but adding to the impurity of the strains."
------------------------------------------
In this particular case, Billy Bob is Ric Blair. You don't get to switch now, besides, this can't cover everyone, it HAS to be based on individuals. Again, you are trying to level the playing field and say that every breeder is exactly equal. This couldn't be further from the truth and this issue has come up a few times, including against Dan Johnson and his Huecos. Ric Blair isn't just anyone. You HAVE to consider the person and everything about them. It is not right, in my mind, to say that just because there was a mix up with his Lajitas line, you now have to throw out all his lines. If it was someone that was already a questionable character, sure, but since it is someone that's been in the hobby for many years with an obvious desire for purity, than I say you have to factor that in.
----------------------------------------------
"I dont even breed alterna anymore but if i was i kinda know which billy bob strains to avoid if i want a guareenty of locality."
----------------------------------------------
Then why are you starting trouble?
----------------------------------------------
"Allot of people are buying snakes at face value and breeding or selling these animals, as laws become tighter it is a must to clean up the breeding herd of captive animals."
-----------------------------------------------
Sure, I agree, but if you think you or I can do anything about it, go ahead and try. Do you think this conversation is going to change anyone's mind?
-----------------------------------------------
"If i had snakes from any one of many billy bobs i would not sell them as locality just to help maintain a purity of captive stock."
-----------------------------------------------
Good for you, that is your choice.
-----------------------------------------------
"If others refuse to look at their stock and say hey there is a chance i might have obtained some bad blood lines, then they just become billy bob themselves."
-----------------------------------------------
I can only speak for myself in that I am more then confident that my stock is pure. I purchased 1 female RR from Ric and he gave me another later on. I'm taking him at face value but I am also factoring in other things. Morphologically, his RR's appear to be pure and exhibit a look I'd expect from RR animals. On top of that, he's a straight shooter with an absolute desire for purity. Because of this, I feel I can take him at face value that his RR's are pure. Could there be a mix up in his RR's? There could be, just as there could be with anybody's animals. But there has not been any red flags to indicate otherwise. There are reasons why the Lajitas animals came into question, and that was because of the red flags associated with a few animals. If there are issues, they will come to the surface.
---------------------------------------
"I hope you understand that we all have obtained bad blood lines in the past"
---------------------------------------
I don't accept what you are saying as fact. If you want to lump that in with all your conspiracy theories, that's fine by me. Just don't expect others to follow.
---------------------------------------
"and you do have some type of responsibility as a breeder to help keep things pure when you represent them as such."
---------------------------------------
Exactly correct, which is why I take into consideration so many parts of the issue at hand.
---------------------------------------
"If you believe that your snakes are pure but someone elses are not, then i think your in denial and you further have the abbillity to spread bad blood lines."
---------------------------------------
First of all, I'm not the one pointing the fingers. Second of all, I've made abundantly clear why I believe my lines are pure. If it is not good enough for you, that's fine by me. Simply stay clear of my animals and move on. Meanwhile, you can work real hard at throwing my name under the bus too.
And finally, good luck with your crusade. Get back to us in about 10 years and let us know how you are doing with that.
OR...
You can be a real part of cleaning up the problem. Joining HCU and being an asset to the cause, we can work together to make things right.
-----
Brad Alexander

FullSpectrumHerps.com