Reptile & Amphibian Forums

Welcome to kingsnake.com's message board system. Here you may share and discuss information with others about your favorite reptile and amphibian related topics such as care and feeding, caging requirements, permits and licenses, and more. Launched in 1997, the kingsnake.com message board system is one of the oldest and largest systems on the internet.

Click for 65% off Shipping with Reptiles 2 You
Click for ZooMed
Click here for Dragon Serpents

Put on your damn helmet day

tanks Aug 05, 2010 12:50 PM

Ok one more time for you window licking slow ones, im not going to point names out so we will just call these folks billy bob's.
It is well known that allot of folks have made mistakes or flat lied, people that once had a great reputation on here are now knocked off their pedestals for this inconsistencies. I have been a member of HCU in the past but did not like the stance of a few people took in the past. It appears to have been corrected now so I will rejoin again. I work along side of several people there to help coordinate facts, and get petition drives of business owners going. I have done far more than 90 percent of the people on here!!!!!!! Now that we have resolved that fact lets get back on track. You guys still with me or you need to adjust your damn helmet for protection LOL ??????

The fact is there is a lot of captive stock with tainted collection and breeding data, if some of you guys have that stock and believe yours is good but another person from up in Kansas is bad then my friend you are in complete denial and need to be thumped upside your damn helmet. You have a responsibility when breeding these animals to disclose this info but even more important you have got to classify these animals as mutts, that's right full blown mutts. If you think you want to ensure the genetic purity and traits of a locality then you must also make the hard decisions and market those animals as GENERIC ANIMALS. Does this make sense or do you truly believe that your stuff is pure but the other 1/2 dozen people you all threw under the buss on this forum for mix ups deserve an apology? Do we settle and just say that from this point forward this is as pure as our captive gene pool will be?

I know if I was breeding locality specifics, at this point I would start with fresh stock so that I could truly with guilt free conscience represent 100% pure animals, not just 90% pure.

Now this part is for you Brad, I don't know you except from the forum, but if you have obtained snakes from billy bob's and believe your animals are pure but someone else's are not due to a mix up, then yes I would not be interested in buying your animals as locality animals, I would buy them as GENERICS and would know that going into the transaction.

I was merely trying to make allot of you understand that you have been sold a bag of goods from some of the messiah's of this forum and you need to except it and try to cleanup the gene pool while its still fresh, as the laws become harder to hunt, collect, possess and to breed snakes this task will never be easier than right now, not 10 years from now. 10 years from now there will be so many generic snakes due to the accidents and di honesty of people that we may never be able to get it back, 10 years from now we will be marketing Alterna as River Road looking animals, or maybe be Langtry look alikes?????

Ok loosen your damn helmets im through.

Replies (12)

Brad Alexander Aug 05, 2010 01:33 PM

You are impossible, not to mention repetitive.

Excellent job, by the way, of handling ANY of the points I brought up (just in case you are too thick to understand, that is me being sarcastic). There's nothing more enjoyable then trying to have a coherent conversation with someone that refuses to acknowledge a few simple points. YES, I've commented on each of yours, but you refuse to acknowledge mine. You just keep spouting off with the same communications over and over.

I knew I was wasting my time with you, but it's been fun. Thanks for the entertainment.

Keep in mind, I've never faulted you for your opinion, nor have I insulted you for having that opinion. Sure, I might insult you for other things, but not for your opinion.

Good luck with the helmets (whatever the he11 that was about).
-----
Brad Alexander

FullSpectrumHerps.com

tanks Aug 05, 2010 04:23 PM

In no way am I insulting your opinion, I am merely stating the facts. There needs to be some real work done to clean up the captive genetics of locality animals for the sake of purity for the few that want it. For those that want generic that is fine too, way to many people are in denial of their animals and with the things that have been discussed in the last 2 years on the forum just further substantiates these facts. Captive genetics are construed. I merely suggest people work diligently while they can to secure honest to goodness pure genes and stay away from the named people of the past, that's it. I believe there is a lack luster effort to clean it up. I have information on several people that have not been honest with there localities either accidental or on purposes, this is why I bring this up now. As I look at the classifieds and see names coming up on there to sell animals it honestly alarms that this is going to get out of hand if it already hasn't.

I do understand that it is difficult for you to have an intelligent conversation with me, hell don't feel bad, when your as perfect as me the lord above struggles to keep up lol

Ill look back at your post and try to straighten you out on there too!!!!!

Brad Alexander Aug 05, 2010 06:26 PM

I hate to be the one to bring this to you, but you are not stating any facts. You are stating your opinion on what has happened to the gene pool and by whom, as well as telling all of us that we need to do something about it. Sorry, no facts.

There are plenty of assumptions, some of which I may be able to agree with.
-----
Brad Alexander

FullSpectrumHerps.com

tanks Aug 05, 2010 07:27 PM

No sire they are facts, believe what you want and take the chance on buying and selling mutts, if you want facts email me its pretty easy to lay it out for you. Dont be so niave to believe that there has only been a few mix ups. You can go back through the archives that have been posted on here and see just a few instances yourself. There are so many more that have never come to light on the forum. The one thing about me is i am a very honest person, if i tell you the sky is falling you better put on your damn helmet. Just email me if you want and i will help you through your denial stage. lol
hemmipens@yahoo.com

Brad Alexander Aug 05, 2010 08:16 PM

I've never once said mix-ups do not happen. I've never once said I completely disagree with you. Nevertheless, you have no facts. Just because you know of something, does not make it a fact to anyone else. Just because you are stir crazed and think so many good names are doing wrong by pure locality, does not make it so. I AM NOT SAYING IT DOESN'T HAPPEN!!! So get off it already. As I've said time and time again, yet you seem too thick to get it, is that I do not draw my line in the same place you do. I am OK with taking certain names and certain animals at face value. And ultimately, that is all anyone is EVER DOING! Who says you can trace it back to wild? You can't! There are NO FACTS! Anyone can make anything up, so ultimately, you are still left with face value.

Lets say Billy Bob was out herping in West Texas in 2002 and "says" he caught a pair of whatever. He provides pictures of his animals that he found wild caught and even showed people in the field what he found. It is STILL an honor system. Anyone can easily fabricate the whole thing. Where you choose to draw your line is up to you, but it does not change the fact that THERE ARE NO FACTS! This is even true, yet obviously less so, when someone may have had another guy there to witness the event of said wild capture. The witness could be in on it. Yes, I know, that is far fetched, but still possible. So the ONLY way to know for 100% sure is to find it yourself. Beyond that, there is nothing you can do. Somewhere down the line at some point you ALWAYS have to resort to taking what one man tells you at face value. Even if you find it yourself, your peers have to take your word for it. Wow, look at that, STILL face value!

If you choose to draw your lines a little tighter and closer to home, that's your call, I have no problem with that. I choose to take into account much more then 1 or 2 little things. If you think that what you do makes things any better, then you are the one in denial. Wrap your little brain around it, it's not hard to figure out. IT ALWAYS BOILS DOWN TO A MANS WORD, HIS CHARACTER, HIS EXPERIENCES, HIS MISTAKES AND THE MORPHOLOGICAL CONDITIONS OF THE LINE YOU ARE INTERESTED IN ACQUIRING FROM HIM.

Since you seem to be missing what I say, here it is AGAIN!

I do not deny that there's been mistakes.

I do not deny that there could be problems with ANYONE'S "pure bred" animals. I never have, and I never will (unless I find it myself).

All I have said is that I choose to draw my lines elsewhere and I've made a point to quantify why I choose to do so. You don't have to like it and you certainly do not have to agree with it.

Now, do us all a favor and take your buddy "Billy Bob" out for a drink and get off your soap box.
-----
Brad Alexander

FullSpectrumHerps.com

swwit Aug 05, 2010 08:52 PM

Well said.

-----
Steve W.

DannyBoy9 Aug 05, 2010 09:28 PM

Hmmm...Maybe not such a good idea. I think Mr Tanks usually has already downed a few before his always prevocative posts.

MTKINGDAVE Aug 08, 2010 12:42 PM

I agree with you 100%. Mr. Tanks, take a seat!

tanks Aug 08, 2010 01:31 PM

It is truly amazing to me and a few others on here the complacency of some people on the forum. There are allot of people that agree with what I have said they just are to afraid to say it where im not.
What makes you think that certain people only made a mistake once and that you are not effected???? Denial???
As time goes on these genetic impurities will only be breed more, their impure off spring will be sold and so on. Now keep in mind I truly believe genetic diversity is a good thing. I have raised whitetail deer for many years and its obvious how well its worked there, now I know snakes are not the same as deer but genetic diversity is good for all breeds of animals I believe.
The whole point was the fact that as you look back at the archives of this forum and you look at some of the pictures of animals being sold on the classified adds you can see how the gene pool has been tainte. That is fine UNLESS YOU ARE TRULY LOOKING FOR A SPECIFIC LOCALITY GENE. That was the whole point is to ask where to know? What do we do to insure the gene pool stays good as we are faced with hunting probation? I had no idea this topic was going to scare the hell out of so many people, I guess the next question is how many of you out there have questionable animals that you have received from BILLY BOB's and JOHN DOE'S? This problem appears to be even bigger than I thought.
Dave how many snakes have you received from some of these people? How many animals can you not verify the parents on, how many animals did you buy at merely face value? I have know idea personally of your collection and its data im just asking. All I know is that every animal that have found I have the exact data on, every animal I have received from the MESSIAH'S of this forum I have gotten rid of as generics or as not being truly locality. Once I found out people where dishonest with their animals I cleaned out most all of my stock and am starting over with what I can verify. If I offer an animal for sale you can bet it will be exactly with no doubt from where I said its from, CAN MOST OF YOU SAY THE SAME?

MTKINGDAVE Aug 10, 2010 04:39 PM

To answer your question, I have specific collection data for all my Hueco and East Sanderson animals. My 277 stock is CB originated from animals I collected myself and my Juno and Xmas stock is from RB. I am very comfortable that my locality stock is legitimate, but it is up to the buyer of my offspring to determine whether the standard is acceptable to them. In any case, you are lucky to get $45/each for most of the babies, similar to what people pay for generics. In the end, it really only matters to the few of us that care. At CA reptile shows, I can tell you almost no one cares about locality.

tanks Aug 08, 2010 02:43 PM

I've never once said mix-ups do not happen. I've never once said I completely disagree with you. Nevertheless, you have no facts. Just because you know of something, does not make it a fact to anyone else. Just because you are stir crazed and think so many good names are doing wrong by pure locality, does not make it so. I AM NOT SAYING IT DOESN'T HAPPEN!!! So get off it already. As I've said time and time again, yet you seem too thick to get it, is that I do not draw my line in the same place you do. I am OK with taking certain names and certain animals at face value. And ultimately, that is all anyone is EVER DOING! Who says you can trace it back to wild? You can't! There are NO FACTS! Anyone can make anything up, so ultimately, you are still left with face value.

If the said person being taken at face value has been less than forthcoming attentionally or on accident, how do you continue to take them at face value? My thick head is used to protect my brain, the same brain that allows for simple things such as decision making.
Mistake Sale = None Creditable, pretty easy right let me slow it down for you a bit ok ready?
1 1=2
If I witness something occur, or read some ones confession or apology for being dishonest or making it a mistake, it is not me telling you its fact it makes it fact by admission of that person, if I witness the sale of a snake that I was led to believe came from one locality but that same snake was sold to someone else as a different locality it factually was miss represented to myself or the other person. That is fact, now on the other hand if the same scenario occurred and I let it go that is denial right?????????? or am I missing something. Are you one of these people that believe KAT spells cat??????

Lets say Billy Bob was out herping in West Texas in 2002 and "says" he caught a pair of whatever. He provides pictures of his animals that he found wild caught and even showed people in the field what he found. It is STILL an honor system. Anyone can easily fabricate the whole thing. Where you choose to draw your line is up to you, but it does not change the fact that THERE ARE NO FACTS! This is even true, yet obviously less so, when someone may have had another guy there to witness the event of said wild capture. The witness could be in on it. Yes, I know, that is far fetched, but still possible. So the ONLY way to know for 100% sure is to find it yourself. Beyond that, there is nothing you can do. Somewhere down the line at some point you ALWAYS have to resort to taking what one man tells you at face value. Even if you find it yourself, your peers have to take your word for it. Wow, look at that, STILL face value!

This is a very good point you make, now with that said. One of the people that I am referring to that has had a cloud of doubt cast upon them, has been suspected of that very thing. Now I have no fact of this so I never brought it up, how ever I can say that PERSON X has miss represented animals for sale. Does it mean every animal was miss represented nooooooooooo but once a there has been a problem with that person we have some type of responsibility to believe there are other mix ups with the stock. My question was what to do with this info. Well for me I would do the honorable thing and disclose these animals as being from previous questionable stock (see there is that thick scull again)

If you choose to draw your lines a little tighter and closer to home, that's your call, I have no problem with that. I choose to take into account much more then 1 or 2 little things. If you think that what you do makes things any better, then you are the one in denial. Wrap your little brain around it, it's not hard to figure out. IT ALWAYS BOILS DOWN TO A MANS WORD, HIS CHARACTER, HIS EXPERIENCES, HIS MISTAKES AND THE MORPHOLOGICAL CONDITIONS OF THE LINE YOU ARE INTERESTED IN ACQUIRING FROM HIM.

So to you if the person has been questionable in the past but he has the MORPHOLOGICAL TRAITS THAT YOU WANT than its ok to re-draw the line in the sand. Please forgive me I did not realize that the genetics of captive stock was depicted by this. THAT IS THE EPITOME OF DENIAL RIGHT THERE. I would hope that you would look past your MORPHOLOGICAL wants and disclose information as to the fact that your stock has been obtained from someone that has had issues in the past. My little brain has been wrapped around this topic for awhile and my little brain has the ability of honesty, does yours, or will you be in such denial that you cant fathom the simplest thought process???????? Try to portray yourself better than some of these people, use that helmet toting skull of yours and be honest and realized you may have tainted stock from some of these people. Without doing so you may end up as being looked upon by some as dishonest as well.

Since you seem to be missing what I say, here it is AGAIN!

Oh no its not missing me at all, I here what your saying, its just hard to imagine your saying it, im dumb founded by the denial.

I do not deny that there's been mistakes.

Mistakes being plural !!!!!!!!

I do not deny that there could be problems with ANYONE'S "pure bred" animals. I never have, and I never will (unless I find it myself).

hell its right under your nose, but you will have to use the thought process of a fith grader can at least do that???

All I have said is that I choose to draw my lines elsewhere and I've made a point to quantify why I choose to do so. You don't have to like it and you certainly do not have to agree with it.

What point have you made, none. You stated you know someone has made mistakes but you choose to believe your genetics are pure. If that is quantifying something then yes sire you did quantify it.

Now, do us all a favor and take your buddy "Billy Bob" out for a drink and get off your soap box.

I was never on a soap box until your complete denial, the ability to justify something to fit your cause is definitely a genetic trait.(lol0) And hell yes I will drink a beer with Billy Bob i dont hat them i just wont believe there genetics. I just know that it may not be a premium beer they bring unless I see him buy it with my own 2 eyes. Other wise its just a generic beer lol
Its time for a new topic, lets move on to another one im bored with this allready.

Brad Alexander Aug 08, 2010 06:53 PM

Tanks, but no tanks, I'll pass on reading more of the same stuff you've already said time and time again.

I'll simply let you ramble on and argue with yourself. I read like 2 sentences of that mumbo jumbo.

If you acknowledged any of my points, great, I missed it. But hey, you had your chance much, much earlier in this conversation when you had my attention.
-----
Brad Alexander

FullSpectrumHerps.com

Site Tools