>>Honestly the Lacey act will not happen.
I also strongly disagree. Bottom line is that things wouldn't have even gotten this far if the DOI wasn't pushing an agenda. Just look at history:
1) About two years ago the USGS publishes a purely academic "study" with two range maps, both of which a 12 year old snake hobbyist would laugh at. One of the range maps is based on a 100 year prediction into the future, and assumes global warming. Of course, the map doesn't take into account if it gets that warm, much of the area on the map would be under water. And keep in mind, this "study" was published without any attempt at some real-life experiments.
Here's a link to the range map nonsense:
http://www.usgs.gov/newsroom/article.asp?ID=1875
2) Two year AFTER the study was published, questionable experiment was attempted by SREL. (From what I heard, the snakes were provided "hibernacula", trees were cut down so the pythons would not climb them and freeze, etc.)
3) Before the results of the experiment could be completed, Mother Nature, with a 10 day cold snap in south Florida, proved what we already knew - that Burmese pythons cannot survive outside of southern Florida. So at best this is a State of Florida issue.
4) The DOI still decides to push the Lacey Act stuff anyway!
I sure hope I am wrong, but at this point, why would honesty and common sense prevail?