This is getting a bit odd. Because, we are doing this on two forums. hahahahahahahahaha
So what I say to you is really me saying it to others reading, because I have already said it to you.
Monitors are easy, getting yours to thrive is easy, Thriving is not the problem. You will soon master that.
The point trying to be made is, you want more. With the intent to breed them. THis is where prasinus and most varanids are murdered in numbers, not getting them to thrive(to feed)
You were told monitors feed well after they are dead, and Robyn seconded that notion.
That i guess is cryptic for, feeding is not the problem or how your really going to massacure that species.
If you read these forums with a non prejudiced mind, you will see that most beginers kill them off because they treat them like snakes. They aren't so they languish. then or excessed, sold off or die.
Once they are in the hands of EXPERTS, then they are killed off in mass because they treat them like mindless reptiles. The key to varanids is nesting, and NOT JUST THE ACTUAL nest.
Varanids behave like birds, nesting is SOCIAL. They do this in groups in particular areas in particular ways. Which is why its not so easy or consistant in captivity.
If you treat them like you would a groups of parrots, you eliminate those problems. You do not have to hibernate, or brumate or any of that crap, They live in groups and nest in pairs. Its just that simple.
Yet science keeps treating reptiles like they are stupid primitive animals. As in, solitary without behavior.
In you can understand this, they treat them with biology mindset. Which is find for the physical aspects of animals. But then apply that to behavior, which is another type of science altogether. Ethlogy.
For instance, they catch them, take them OUT OF THEIR ENVIORNMENT, CUT THEM ALL THE WAY OPEN, INSTALL FORIEGN DEVICES, radios, sew them back up and expect them to ACT normally. That is not scientific. That is blind ego.
No animal will function normally after evasive surgery. No animals will behave normally after a large foriegn body is installed inside them.
What happens is, after being molested, varanids act in a very normal way, they run, they attempt to escape, they flee the areas they were attacked in. So biologists in there ignorance they say, they are solitary. Its the methods controlling the results.
So yes, that information will screw your efforts up everytime. So I tell you, look to those DOING WHAT YOUR DOING.
YEt, your so prejudiced, you look to prasinus breeders. Just what, prasinus are no different then any other species.
COMMON SENSE MY FRIEND. what makes them different is the habitat they live in. That habitat supports their varanid requirements. Their adaptions are to extract the same support from different conditions. In a cage, that habitat is GONE, completely gone. So what you have left is a varanid.
Varanids are generalists to the max. They are not prey specialists, they all eat the same exact food. Even the fruit feeders, recognize rodents and birds and insects are food.
They smell it, taste it and then eat it. the reality is, if they were food specialist, they would not recognize those other things as food. Or they would eat trees and rocks and anything else thats not food.
So yes, keeping varanids is counterdictory. the reason is simple. Its the last bastion of poor science. In our case, our science produces NO RESULTS. Its merely written like you say. The problem is, peer review. Peers are friends and protect eachother.
Which is normal, but in most areas of science, there are hundreds, thousands of scientists working in the same areas of study. With reptiles, there is not money or funding so theres a couple, each picks an area, and now we have to wait a lifetime to see science work. Science is to always question itself. This is lacking in this area.
So I say applied, that is, those of us who produce results. To do that, you the listener, must question the source and see WHAT THE RESULTS were before you go farther. Most are so excited to hatch one, they publish tons of literature from on baby that hatched. In most cases, they got lucky.
If you want information that will help you, you should look for generations. That shows a longterm understanding. Not luck.
So I say, those with generations of experience, and with multipule species, agree, there is more difference between individuals, then between species.
So I recomend to you, get experience, do some generations with species that will allow you to succeed. The truth is, it does even take that long.
If done right, you can do a generation every six months. 18 months from now, you could have three generations under your belt.
The question is, will you have learned anything from that????? In order to achieve a generation, you must complete the key steps or requirements. To achieve two generations, you must learn what WAS ACTUALLY required. After many generations you learn the absolute minimun thats required.
I think you have a great additude, and I do not take anything personal. except I do want to protect the needless abuse of monitors. Specially those of limited availability. Your killing off animals that should be in the hands of keepers that have already gained the experience to succeed. Like me.
This was already mentioned. In the Daniel Bennett thread.
Your approach is the copy method. that is, you hope to copy someone. That does not work with varanids, like it does in snakes.
Again, the reason is, monitors are behavioral and react to YOU. even if you copy others conditions. Its how you support those conditions. Cheers and sorry for yet another rant.