> 50% Possible Het Pied X 100% Het Pied = 4 Normal looking babies.
That is much too small a sample. I'd get 17 eggs before giving up. That number of babies with no pieds gives a 99% probability that the possible het pied is actually a normal.
> As a breeder/seller I would have a very hard time selling these babies as 50% Possible het Pieds, to me they would just be Normals.
Your choice.
>And I would only give the 50% Het parent on more try, but would breed it to a Pied, too see if it is in fact a Het Pied. If no Pieds come the resulting clutch of eggs, that particular Poss Het would be sold as a Normal as well.
The 50% probability het pied x pied mating would have to have at least 7 normal-looking babies and no pieds before I'd give up. That gives a 99% probability that the possible het pied is actually a normal.
>I have ZERO faith in Possible Het anythings.
That's good, if it keep you out of the casinos. 
I used to help maintain a stock of mice with the jaundice mutant gene, which was recessive to the normal alternate gene. Heterozygotes looked normal, and homozygous jaundice mice were a golden color when born and died within a day or two. The only way to keep the stock going was to mate heterozygous mouse to heterozygous mouse. And all the babies from het x het matings were 66% probability hets. We got enough proven hets to keep the stock going, so I do have faith in possible hets. I just don't expect Lady Luck to bless every roll of the genetic dice.
Paul Hollander