"I wonder if anyone gets my point in all this?"
ummm, ......no, not really?..LOL!
I thought from the very beginning that king on your leg "could" have very well been an authentic getula from the head shape and patterning on it, and the "V" shape marking on the back of the head/neck. But with only a couple inches of body showing for us to see there, it ain't exactly proof of it being a pure form Eastern getula, or anything else really. Anyway, except for the Glossy, I know the other's certainly were hybrids and/or intergrades.
yeah sure you say that now, LOL!..Just joking w/ya!
Anyway, what was your point?
Well I think that spotted Eastern king and the Bullseye pattern was used Brian Hubbs KIngsnake book (I am sure your copy is tattered from use), which you frequently read and quote from.
The snakes are the same ones in his book. Just not the same pics. I hooked Hubbs up with those snakes. Since i live in GA I didn't want my name attached to any GA snakes.
(See. I am EVERYWHERE!! HA HA HA !)
My point is. People still can't tell a hybrid from a -intergrade -from a pure specimen. And that breeding them we can learn a lot about what makes a specimen pure and not...
........Unless you are ME.HA HA HA!
....I have experience with breeding and reproducing hybrids and pure stuff as well as locality specific (rosy boas especially) have learned a hell of a lot from them.. One can learn a lot about how genetics work and conclude that most wildcausght snakes evolve from hybrids and intergrades very quickly anyway.
Also a lot of snakes in collections that are accpeted as pure by the hobby are actually hybrids. some of the pioneers back in the early 80's started secretly hybridzing. They sold them as pure along with actualy pure ones. Confusing huh!?
So what it boils down to is JUST pride of Ownership. Because it is what we THINKS makes us happy. I would think creating beautiful hybrids would be more popular. But jealousy of peer groups brought the prices down and most could not afford them in the beginning. Hybrids certainly take a lot more LONG work and BREEDING efforts than just reproducing regular 'ol snakes. So I don't get that part and why folks are rewarded for doing nothing? I think of the many no-nothings that have a couple snakes in their collection and then got a name in the herpetoculture industry because they bred two snakes they bought for $50. and bred them to get a "surprise" new morph/recessive trait that costs $5000. What did they do besides get lucky?
Breeding efforts should be rewarded because it takes many seasons and time. That includes mutli hets and homozygots such as Florida kings, cal kings (Kerbys Cal kings are amazing!) and Hognose. The Ball Pythons are to easy because of the codom traits...but at least the poor BP FARMS in Africa are hand picking weird ones for import- At least they are making their own luck.
Anyway, I got a bit off track on my rant. But the point is..common snakes are cheap (inespensive) for a reason. If people don't know by looking at them. what makes them valuable? Knowing whats inside? or the actualy history of a snake? Then if so, then why not a long and accurate history on hybrids and multi morphs combos ? At least we can see what the results are
-----
www.Bluerosy.com
