The intent of the law is to save the species, but not individuals persay. Lawmakers worry that the species/subspecies will be threatened by 100s and 100s of collectors running amuck over years, vs some habitat being developed.
What is aggravating is that the loss of habitat in So Cal outweighs the threat of collectors. Reasonable bag limits make the most sense here, and Calif is not too bad when it comes to bag limits. Could be better, but I know it could be far worse. Way easier to have a law forbidding any wildcaughts in the minds of many opponents of our hobby.
Years ago just before a big wonderful field in Palos Verdes was to be plowed for Trump National Golf Course, I happened to find a really nice, light-colored (for the area) San Diego gophersnake right out on the roadside. I picked it up with full intent to take it, since the field was doomed.
I swear, 2 Animal Control folks drove over to me and told me I could not take it. They had been there for something else and saw me. I didn't have my fishing license with me. I implored them, I mean the snake's field was to be destroyed within days or weeks. They said no. I put the snake down, the officers drove off.
Suffice to say the snake was saved shortly thereafter by someone who looked like me. But yeah, this is when laws contradict the intent.
-----
Mark