>>Like I said it was what I was told but it makes sense to me, really when do you see any baby of any animal including our own that's not kinda fatty. From what I've been told when they are weaned and eating solids is when they are healthier then rats because they are building muscle and bone density by then and feeding on more healthy feeds. I don't have any analysis but would love to see some to confirm what I've been told if it's true or not but I just don't risk it.
>>
>>great topic
>>-----
>>
>> Zack Greens Reptiles
Rabbit pinkies are super lean, you can tell just by holding and looking at them. And the point I was trying to make is that rats are much higher in fat that rabbits, so you have to take that into consideration if you're just going to look at fat content.
Here is an interesting document on nutritional analysis of food items:
http://www.nal.usda.gov/awic/zoo/WholePreyFinal02May29.pdf
Per this document, neonate rabbits are 13% crude fat, while rats are around 25%.
Also, per this document, the young of individual species are LESS fatty than the older animals.
Agreed, this is a great discussion, and a good example of why we should always question things, even if supposed "experts" claim them.
From my point of view, I'm the one playing it safe by feeding rabbits and quail. 
Thanks,
Ed