He's right Tom. You DO need to accept it...And man up. Quit being such a whimp. You make me sick. What the heck were you thinking right then...trying to encourage "the keeper" and all that. But that's beside the point. I certainly do not want to get off point here; point being that the said "keeper" killed the aforementioned captive reptilian in cold blood due to the "keeper's" inadequate husbandry methods.
Now with that being said, the "keeper" finally knows, absolutely and unequivocally, that he, the "keeper", caused the snake to die. And now the "keeper", has to accept this...but you still do too, Tom (so man up, whimp). At least now, the "keeper" (me-mbrawley) can breath a sigh of relief and no longer ponder the mysteries of life and death.
Now don't get all crazy on me FR...just having fun here in my boring office 
My only point is this, I AGREE, and I think I made it clear in my post, the snake was in perfect health for close to a year before her fateful demise. So YES, it probably was husbandry related...however COMMA,
Unless a post mortem exam was done on it (which it wasn't) how can ANYONE, including me, definitively make that assessment? It's not that simple and there are a lot of variables in this world we live. It's not like the snake was left in a car for two hours during a 110* mid summer afternoon with the windows rolled up. It's not like a left a rat in the tub over night and found a bigger, fatter, lazier rat in the tub the next day, but no snake. The fact is sometimes these things CAN happen and for no apparent reason. As a matter of fact, I've seen the occasional reptile in the wild (over many years of herping) that appeared to be really weak and malnurished, circling the drain,for some unknown reason. Sounds like survival of the fittest to me.
One of the things you quickly disputed Tom about in your reply was regarding the number of offspring procreated by reptiles, and their mortality rate. I noticed your main disagreement was specifically the disease comment he made, yet the first thing he rightly stated WAS predation - As did YOU. You guys are on the same page. It seems like the motality rate vs disease discussion, -factual or not- is kind of trivial and is really just a small difference of opinion that needs NOT be made an issue of in the context of my post. Give Tom a break. You read his post; it's clear what his intentions were. He's a big boy I'm sure and doesn't need me go to bat for him, but really, no need to come at him like that. You gotta admit when you re-read your post, it was a little condescending. I did not ask Tom for his kind sentiments...But I appreciate them. So now I feel worse about the whole "Tom getting his ass chewed" than I did about my snake dying. PLEASE...NO MORE KIND WORDS EVERYONE. hahahha! J/K!
Thanks again Tom.
And FR, no big deal, no harm no foul. Please don't take this the wrong way man.
