Reptile & Amphibian Forums

Welcome to kingsnake.com's message board system. Here you may share and discuss information with others about your favorite reptile and amphibian related topics such as care and feeding, caging requirements, permits and licenses, and more. Launched in 1997, the kingsnake.com message board system is one of the oldest and largest systems on the internet.

Click for 65% off Shipping with Reptiles 2 You
Click for 65% off Shipping with Reptiles 2 You

WSJ on FWS Rule Making

USARK Apr 13, 2011 11:51 AM

By Angus Loten

Snake breeders, pet shop owners and other reptile entrepreneurs are seething over a proposed ban on the import and interstate trade of pythons, anacondas and other snakes by the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, saying the science behind the move is flawed.

Last month, the agency submitted a final rule outlining the ban to the White House for review by the Office of Management and Budget.

Government scientists say the snakes pose a threat to native ecosystems if set free, consuming everything from plants to birds to alligators. They’re seeking to add nine new species to the Injurious Wildlife List of the Lacey Act, which would prevent the snakes from being imported from abroad or sold across state lines.

About one million Americans already own the types of snakes that would be covered by the ban, according to the United States Association of Reptile Keepers, a Wilmington, N.C., trade group that includes more than 10,000 snake breeders and sellers.

Annual trade in these snakes is estimated at more than $100 million, the group says. Some rare species can sell for more than $70,000.

“If enacted, this rule would destroy thousands of businesses and place nearly one million U.S. citizens in jeopardy of becoming felons under the Lacey Act,” the group said in a statement on Tuesday.

It says the ban is being driven by “fundamentally flawed” studies by U.S. Geological Survey invasion biologists who say the snakes could adapt to climates across the southern U.S., claims attacked by the National Geographic Society, the University of Florida and other experts in a recent letter to the U.S. Senate Environmental & Public Works Committee.

A final decision on the rule is expected this summer.

Last week, Bronx Zoo officials retrieved a cobra that went missing for nearly two weeks from the reptile house without incident.
Link

-----
USARK

Replies (4)

Calparsoni Apr 13, 2011 05:29 PM

Gig anybody else catch this?

"Government scientists say the snakes pose a threat to native ecosystems if set free, consuming everything from plants to birds to alligators. They’re seeking to add nine new species to the Injurious Wildlife List of the Lacey Act, which would prevent the snakes from being imported from abroad or sold across state lines."

Plants???? Snakes eating plants????I wonder who actually claimed this interesting fact? I wonder how much of our tax dollars are being blown on their salary?

Perhaps they are referring to the vegetarian species that convinced eve to eat an apple, other than that I was not aware of herbivory occurring in snakes but what do I know ,I'm just a hobbyist.

Chris_McMartin Apr 13, 2011 08:50 PM

Perhaps they are referring to the vegetarian species that convinced eve to eat an apple

THAT serpent didn't eat any apples HIMSELF...

I like the non sequitir bit about the escaped cobra. You know, just to leave the reader with a little fear-mongering.
-----
Chris McMartin
www.mcmartinville.com
I'm Not a Herpetologist, but I Play One on the Internet

natsamjosh Apr 14, 2011 11:41 AM

>>
>>I like the non sequitir bit about the escaped cobra. You know, just to leave the reader with a little fear-mongering.

Yeah, the plant thing didn't bother me, probably just a stupid mistake. The completely irrelevant (and quite awkward) reference to the cobra was disturbing. I would have expected better from the WSJ.

USARK Apr 15, 2011 09:36 PM

natsamjosh is correct... it was a misstatement about the plants.
-----
USARK

Site Tools