This is a GREAT example of why this forum is lacking credibility.
My opinion, and many others, but sorry, snakes do not bond. Saying they " bond " makes the act of throwing a ton of snakes together sound not so bad, at the first second. Then, the second second comes in, and people scratch their heads. Then reality sets in about the fact they are kings.
No one I know that knows a lot about snakes actually believes it, or thinks it is a good idea. Biologists, breeders with great reputations, breeders with degrees in biology, etc.. These are people with actual experience.
The thing about snakes living communally is a farce, and here is why. I am not actually speaking about two at a time, which is still tricky to say the least, but multitudes. The fact that some would think that snakes are capable of social behaviour is at first, IMO, attractive, but not factual. Bonding is social behaviour. Snakes have the instinct to live separately. Remember, snakes found in the wild together are usually found both breeding and under a safe habitat/winter den. It is that safe habitat that is the reason they are there.
If there is a safe habitat in an area where many snakes are, they will naturally all use it, and being found at times, one would think that they would be sharing, so to say. Fact is, they are just sharing the same habitat, as their INSTINCT is showing them to. Their instinct is telling them to be in a safe place. Remember, they are acting out to survive.
If snakes are seeming to be ok living with one another in captivity in a cage, that means that that the cage is satisfying the right circumstances at that particular moment. That is why the cases of a few being kept together or so seem to support this. Once those circumstances are met with changing conditions, then accidents happen. They do happen. The proof is there, so much that even arguing about it is immature, to say the least. It is comparable to a drug addict, as he takes a hit off of a crack pipe, that he won't be affected physically by the hit. Chemically, he will be affected, no matter what. Same with kings. They are kings because they EAT other snakes and LOVE IT! They are always capable of doing so. You can't take that out of them, what is natural instinct.
Also, if snakes bonded, there would be only one mate between two snakes of the opposite sex. Sorry, does not happen.
So, as breeders view viewpoints about all of this so-called bonding, as they are tired of this misinformation, they are left to conclude that:
People who spout this are maybe desiring others to look up to them and they crave attention. They are in the habit of saying things so against the grain, to get attention. This is just a hypothesis.
They simply believe that the truth is not there. Another hypothesis.
If indeed, these multitudes of snakes were actually housed together:
1. What size plastic tub is big enough to house a multitude of bonding snakes? There is none. How clean can these cages be? Tons of snakes crawling thru tons of poop, and into the water dish, is disgusting. Guess what that leads to? Thats right boys and girls...sickness and sickness being spread!
2. Would this type of housing be constituted as hoarding/animal cruelty?
And to end this, is there really any actual scientific evidence supporing bonding? Nope. Finding snakes, a few kings, under a board or rock in a field out somewhere is not enough evidence.
Is there actually scientific evidence that shows kings eat other snakes? Yep!! Hence the name.
So, in all, my opinion, and many others, who don't even want to type out anything on this forum and have to deal with the childish bickering. This will be my only post as well, as I have said all I am going to say.
-----
Genesis 1:1