Reptile & Amphibian Forums

Welcome to kingsnake.com's message board system. Here you may share and discuss information with others about your favorite reptile and amphibian related topics such as care and feeding, caging requirements, permits and licenses, and more. Launched in 1997, the kingsnake.com message board system is one of the oldest and largest systems on the internet.

Click here to visit Classifieds
Click for ZooMed

Lets try again,

FR Nov 20, 2012 11:47 AM

Its there anybody out there that is keeping hogs not in shoeboxes and would like to share your observations?

For you shoebox keepers, I have no need to use shoe/sweater boxes, and for several reasons, One is, I am one of the founders of that method. So I do have some understanding of its benefits and its drawbacks and it has both.

I cannot hose lots of hogs, so there is no need for that. And I do have lots of space.

Also, I am a fan of behavior, not only keepers behavior(as odd as it is) more importantly the snakes behavior. And I understand everything we do limits that, and shoeboxes take that to the extreme.

I tend to approach animals in a naive way, that is, I know nothing, they know everything. Its fun that way. I get no joy in telling animals what to do, oh except my dog.

I little history, I am not a newbie to snakes, been keeping and breeding them for a long time, 1959 or so, and kings since 1964. I have bred three types of hogs, easterns, pygmys and mexicans, but all were a very long time ago, over thirty years ago.

So to me, its more then just breeding them, which is why I am taking the approach I am taking.

It appears my approach scares some folks, I apologise for that, really theres nothing I can do to change that. I cannot change my history and I do not want to change yours. I do wonder why some folks are so insecure, They come off as successful, and if so, why would you care or be bothered by what anyone else does? AGain, as a fan of behavior, that does interest me, but only in a casual way.

I am also a fan of all these beautiful morphs, and unlike many field guys, I think its great.

So if you have something to share with me, I thank you for that. Cheers

P.S. Troy, that was really weird, I had no intentions or insinuations directed at you. Up to that point, you were the only one to offer me anything of use. But if your skin is that thin, its best your hands stay clean. Sorry

Replies (5)

Gregg_M_Madden Nov 20, 2012 06:21 PM

Hey Frank,
I am going to break up your post a bit here. Not because I am trying to rip it apart, but because it is just easier to follow.

FR wrote:
***"Its there anybody out there that is keeping hogs not in shoeboxes and would like to share your observations?"***

I happen to keep adult hognose snakes in 36 quart "shoe boxes" and I have a couple in "naturalistic" set ups. Honestly, they do the same things and display the same behaviors in both types of set ups. I see no difference. And yes, they have "life experiences" in both set ups. If your "shoe box" is set up properly, it will work just as well as a "natural" set up.

FR wrote:
***"For you shoebox keepers, I have no need to use shoe/sweater boxes, and for several reasons, One is, I am one of the founders of that method. So I do have some understanding of its benefits and its drawbacks and it has both."***

Yes Frank, We all realize that you have invented all of the current keeping methods. Being that you were the "founder" of keeping snakes in a rack set up, why not let us know what the drawbacks are. I think if you want to set your hogs up in natural type set ups, that is great. I for one would love to see what you do. In fact, that is one of the reasons I was happy to see you showing an interest in keeping the species. I do not agree with everything you have to say but I do respect your level of commitment to captive husbandry.

FR wrote:
***"I cannot house lots of hogs, so there is no need for that. And I do have lots of space."***

Like I said, I am looking foward to seeing what you do when it comes to snake keeping and naturalistic housing.

FR wrote:
***"Also, I am a fan of behavior, not only keepers behavior(as odd as it is) more importantly the snakes behavior. And I understand everything we do limits that, and shoeboxes take that to the extreme."***

Well from what I have seen, it does not limit it at all. That is when it comes to captive hogs. From what I can tell so far, setting them up in larger naturalistic cages does not change a thing.

FR wrote:
***"I tend to approach animals in a naive way, that is, I know nothing, they know everything. Its fun that way. I get no joy in telling animals what to do, oh except my dog."***

But in captivity, you are not telling your snakes what to do. What we do is just what nature does. They are reacting to outside pressures in nature and they do the same in captivity. What are we actually "telling" our snakes to do in captivity in your opinion?

FR wrote:
***"I little history, I am not a newbie to snakes, been keeping and breeding them for a long time, 1959 or so, and kings since 1964. I have bred three types of hogs, easterns, pygmys and mexicans, but all were a very long time ago, over thirty years ago."***

That is awesome.
So, has the "pygmy" hognose gone extinct since 1964? Never heard of the species before.

FR wrote:
***"So to me, its more then just breeding them, which is why I am taking the approach I am taking."***

It is more than just breeding them for most of us.

FR wrote:
***"It appears my approach scares some folks, I apologise for that, really theres nothing I can do to change that. I cannot change my history and I do not want to change yours. I do wonder why some folks are so insecure, They come off as successful, and if so, why would you care or be bothered by what anyone else does? AGain, as a fan of behavior, that does interest me, but only in a casual way."***

Frank, there is nothing scary about you. You are not scaring anyone. Your approach pisses people off. I happen to think you enjoy that. Even super secure people do not like to be belittled on public forums or otherwise.

FR wrote:
***"I am also a fan of all these beautiful morphs, and unlike many field guys, I think its great."***

Whats not to like? These beautiful morphs happen in the wild. In fact, most of the current base morphs were wild caught. Some were even adults when they were wild collected. Why would a field guy not like naturally occuring genetic defects that can actually thrive in the wild?

FR wrote:
***"So if you have something to share with me, I thank you for that. Cheers "***

I have shared. It may not be the profound answer you are looking to hear but it is what I can tell you from my personal experience.

FR Nov 21, 2012 10:30 AM

Thanks for the reply, and that type of response will only lead to confusion. It seperates instead of helping.

Maybe you could copy your reply and address a paragraph everyday or so, that way the forum would have something to do. Maybe two a day.

I am not saying what your doing is wrong, but simply put, if I responded to your reply the same way you did, It would take twice as long, then your reply would again be twice a long. Then we may as well write a book.

Pygmy=southern, thats what we called them way back then, sorry.

Not to challange you, but what are the behaviors you call the same in each of your setups? That is the point. If neither cage type allows much, then they will be the same.

The question is, what does sweater boxes allow. For instance, how much of a temp choice do your hogs have in either setup? and how are they going about making temp choices. I will use temps first as they are what they do in nature.

I have done and been on many field studies, and the selection of temps and humidity are done minuted to minute.

In the field, one thing that sticks out is, Hogs use really really hot temps for a colubrid.

I am just begining to look at them in the field, but I already have one interesting event. I observed one neonate laying on top of low bushes heating up its food bolus(green toad).

We have seen them out and moving from air temps of, 54f to the mid 90's, with ground temps( what is actually important to them) ranging from the sixties to 140's. 85F being a "GOOD" target.

In the nature, hogs thermoregulate, mostling in the ground, going down for cool, up to near the surface for heat. Most of our ground dwellers do that. Only rarely have I(and i am new) seen them thermoregulate using the sun, coiled or otherwise.

what interests me is diet. Yes, they consume toads, but somethings missing. If you look at reproduction and prey timing, toads do not seem(theory) to be important. In the area I am looking at them, lizards play an important part.

If you look at their range as it extends westward. They do not follow toad populations or species, its fairly clear they follow box turtles.

They are known to consume eggs, I am thinking, that is a superior source of energy for adults. Hopefully time will tell. This is a question, to be looked into.

The only odd food item I discovered(others may know this, but I surely didn't) is that they relish earthworms. Found some in the field, offered them to several hogs, neonates and young adults, and they took them readily.

At this time, I am unsure as to how or what I want to observe in captivity. Often times, I use both captivity and nature to gain an understanding. If I find ground nesting bird eggs, I will offer them to captive hogs, and of course I will look for evidence in the field.

The captives i have now are kept in a four foot cage, for the time being, I have retes stacks on both ends, and a lite above one end. Retes stacks are stacks of thin boards with small spacers, I developed this with pyros, to test temp choices. Then were coined retes stacks by others with their use on varanids.

I am not sure they will reveal much with hogs, but so far, so good. Right now they have a range of 65F to 90 . They are not feeding much at this time and using temps of 81f consistantly for the warm choice, and high sixties to low seventies for the low choice. The problem is, I am not sure if the way I have the choices hinders the choices they make. Again, time will tell.

As I get a handle on these wonderful snakes, I will be using trough setups with deep substrate and observing them in those type setups.

On the captive side, nesting seems to be overlooked. This will be the first area I look into. What I have seen so far is not good.

I will use that new book Designer morphs for an example. The photos it uses for nesting/egg laying, is what I call an abortion. It makes me want to throw up, hahahahahahahahahahaha sorry it does.

Let me explain, all colubrid nests I have seen in nature are tight and repeated, that is, they all had certain characteristics.

Let me offer a short comparison, The pics on page 72 and 73. The eggs are scattered and unorganized. The female is out of position and is only attemping to survive, not nest. In those type of conditions, I am sure egg binding occurs more then you want.

I will attempt to upload a pic of a normal nesting.

The gravid female coils with her head on the outside and cloaca in the middle, she moves in a circular motion, and deposits the eggs in a clump in the middle, as she crawls in a circle, she creates an air space all around the eggs(ground nesters) This picture clearly shows that.

The picture is of a captive deep nesting. Its organized and completely different then the photos in that book. For one, all natural nests are completely dark, no lite what so ever. In captivity no attention is paid to that. To lay in lite, is against their nature and very stressful. I will explain more in the next post. Thank you again

DISCERN Nov 20, 2012 10:32 PM

Frank,

Normally, I do not post to trolls, as in doing so, that promotes their sick obsession with hearing themselves talk. However, I have a question to ask you...

Let me ask....what is your point of your post, full of egocentric and self-promoting ramblings? This post seem to really not ask any questions.

Are you bored, since people grew tired of your trolling and belittling of others, over on the Kingsnake forum?

Please, find something constructive to do with your time. If you have something to add, please do so. Being positive and productive and displaying a unified attitude is what being a fellow herper is about. Your belittling attitude though, needs to never be shown on these forums. If you can post without being negative or full of yourself, please do so.

Here is a pic of my hog, who, lives in a shoebox, has a great life, and whom I have enjoyed taking care of, and watching flourish and grow, while I study everything about him.

-----
Genesis 1:1

FR Nov 21, 2012 12:16 PM

As usual you babble for nothing, If your happy with what you do, then please by all means keep doing it. Its really plain to see, its all about you.

If your happy with your current understanding of hogs, then please do not attempt to learn more.

I surely do not want you to actually think, as it may hurt you. So please, keep up what your doing.

Please understand, for me, the joy is learning, not knowing. I must be rare. I even think its fun to relearn something. Cheers

DISCERN Nov 21, 2012 09:17 PM

It's all about me? HA HA!
Really...sure Frank.
If you really had the joy of learning, you would then have a full understanding of what comes along with the joy of learning. Part of that is sharing with others, including humility and acceptance of others' opinions. You and your reputation do not contain such things. Part of that humility that comes along with learning is treating others with respect. You do not.

So, with the evidence that you show on these forums, you do not care about learning, but you care about hearing yourself talk. This is not a rude remark towards yourself, it is fact.

No need to feed trolls anymore. NEXT!
-----
Genesis 1:1

Site Tools