Reptile & Amphibian Forums

RESUME:

GEORGE W. BUSH
The White House
USA

PAST WORK EXPERIENCE:

I ran for congress and lost. I produced a Hollywood
slasher B movie. I
bought an oil company, but couldn't find any oil in
Texas; company went
bankrupt shortly after I sold all my stock. I bought
the Texas Rangers
baseball team in a sweetheart deal that took land
using taxpayer money.
Biggest move: Traded Sammy Sosa to the Chicago White
Sox. With my
father's
help (and his name) was elected Governor of Texas.

ACCOMPLISHMENTS:

I changed pollution laws for power and oil companies
and made Texas the
most
polluted state in the Union. I replaced Los Angeles
with Houston as the
most
smog ridden city in America. I cut taxes and
bankrupted the Texas
government
to the tune of billions in borrowed money. I set
record for most
executions
by any Governor in American history. I became
president after losing
the
popular vote by over 500,000 votes, with the help of
my fathers
appointments
to the Supreme Court.

ACCOMPLISHMENTS AS PRESIDENT:

I attacked two countries. I spent the surplus and
bankrupted the
treasury. I
shattered record for biggest annual deficit in
history. I set economic
record for most private bankruptcies filed in any 12
month period.

I set all-time record for biggest drop in the history
of the stock
market.

I am the first president in decades to execute a
federal prisoner. I am
the
first president in US history to enter office with a
criminal record.

In the first year in office I set the all-time record
for most days on
vacation by any president in US history. After taking
the entire month
of
August off for vacation, I presided over the worst
security failure in
US
history.

I set the record for most campaign fundraising trips
than any other
president in US history.

In my first two years in office over 2 million
Americans lost their
job. I
cut unemployment benefits for more out of work
Americans than any
president
in US history.

I signed more laws and executive orders amending the
Constitution than
any
president in US history. I presided over the biggest
energy crises in
US
history and refused to intervene when corruption was
revealed. I
presided
over the highest gasoline prices in US history and
refused to use the
national reserves as past presidents have.

I cut healthcare benefits for war veterans.

I set the all-time record for most people worldwide to
simultaneously
take
to the streets to protest me (15 million people),
shattering the record
for
protest against any person in the history of mankind.

I dissolved more international treaties than any
president in US
history.
Members of my cabinet are the richest of any
administration in US
history.
(The 'poorest' multimillionaire, Condoleeza Rice has a
Chevron oil
tanker
named after her).

I am the first president in US history to order a US
attack and
military
occupation of a sovereign nation, and I did so against
the will of the
United Nations and the world community. I created the
largest
government
department bureaucracy in the history of the United
States.

I set the all-time record for biggest annual budget
spending increases,
more
than any president in US history. I am the first
president in US
history to
have the United Nations remove the US from the human
rights
commission. I
am the first president in US history to have the
United Nations remove
the
US from the elections monitoring board.

I removed more checks and balances, and have the least
amount of
congressional oversight than any presidential
administration in US
history.
I rendered the entire United Nations irrelevant. I
withdrew from the
World
Court of Law. I refused to allow inspectors access to
US prisoners of
war
and by default no longer abide by the Geneva
Conventions.

I am the first president in US history to refuse
United Nations
election
inspectors (during the 2002 US elections).

I am the all-time US (and world) record holder for
most corporate
campaign
donations. My biggest lifetime campaign contributor,
who is also one of
my
best friends, presided over one of the largest
corporate bankruptcy
frauds
in world history (Kenneth Lay, former CEO of Enron
Corporation).

I, with a policy of "disengagement," created the most
hostile
Israeli-Palestine relations in at least 30 years. I am
the first US
president in history to have a majority of the people
of Europe (71%)
view
my presidency as the biggest threat to world peace and
stability.

I am the first US president in history to have the
people of South
Korea
more threatened by the US than their immediate
neighbor, North Korea.

I failed to fulfill my pledge to get Osama Bin Laden
"dead or alive." I
failed to capture the anthrax killer who tried to
murder the leaders of
our
country at the United States Capitol building. After
18 months I have
no
leads and zero suspects. In the 18 months following
the 911 attacks I
have
successfully prevented any public investigation into
the biggest
security
failure in the history of the United States.

I removed more freedoms and civil liberties for
Americans than any
other
president in US history. In a little over two years I
created the most
divided country in decades, possibly the most divided
the US has ever
been
since the civil war.

I entered office with the strongest economy in US
history and in less
than
two years turned every single economic category
heading straight down.

RECORDS AND REFERENCES:

I have At least one conviction for drunk driving in
Maine (Texas
driving
record has been erased and is not available). I was
AWOL from National
Guard
and deserted the military during a time of war. I
refuse to take drug
test
or even answer any questions about drug use. All
records of my tenure
as
governor of Texas have been spirited away to my
fathers library, sealed
in
secrecy and unavailable for public view. All records
of any SEC
investigations into my insider trading or bankrupt
companies are sealed
in
secrecy and unavailable for public view. All minutes
of meetings for
any
public corporation I served on the board are sealed in
secrecy and
unavailable for public view. Any records or minutes
from meetings I (or
my
VP) attended regarding public energy policy are sealed
in secrecy and
unavailable for public review. For personal references
please speak to
my
daddy or uncle James Baker (They can be reached at
their offices of the
Carlyle Group for war-profiteering.)

Is it just a coincidence that you, Kanuck, are not American? You say that you are married to an American, are your in-laws are big George Bush supporters? Does your anti-America mentality annoy them, or do they too laugh at your envy? How embarassed is your wife by your anti-American rant? is she even aware of your venom, or do you sneak off to post your disgust for her country? You dodged these questions the last time someone asked, what's the problem?

Devin P.

PS Americans aren't real impressed with Canada either. Bush 2004!

Stoeckl, would you please build one of those "high stone walls", that you are so fond of, around Canada? Kanuck seems to have an unhealthy fixation on George Bush. He seems to be a tad unstable these days as he is hiding behind articles that portray president Bush as an evil dictator, and he has obviously confused Bush with guys like Saddam and UBL. In light of Kanuck's bitter attitude toward our President, and his delusional perception of what Bush is all about, I believe that Kanuck would be much better off if he were confined to his apparently perfect country. Get to work Stoeckl!

Devin P.

Awww, Devin, is that the best you've got???? Try actually responding to whats posted for a change. Can you refute any of it? Thought not. Do I like and agree with Bush? At this point who cares. It's a debate on the merits of his leadership and whether he was justified in going to war. Can you formulate an intelligent, rational defense to the facts as presented? Go ahead and try, but I doubt it. You'll resort to your usual ranting about how everyone is anti-american and against the poor old U.S.OF A.

you say:

"It's a debate on the merits of his leadership and whether he was justified in going to war."

And what does the piece of trash that you posted have anything to do with "whether he was justified in going to war"? I'll answer that for you: NOTHING! You simply wanted to bash a high-profile American, and in doing do you have once again exposed yourself a nothing more than someone who hates Americans.

How could Bush possibly have been justified in going to war, given the fact that he "produced a Hollywood slasher B movie"? Wow, great point Kanuck!

How could Bush possibly have been justified in going to war, given the fact that he "couldn't find any oil in Texas"? Give yourself a pat on the back Kaunck!

How could Bush possibly have been justified in going to war, given the fact that he "traded Sammy Sosa to the White Sox"? Maybe you should answer this one Kanuck?

I could go right down the list and entertain your idiotic mush, but what's the point? You are determined to bash Bush without any point. If gelatinous Canadians like you are still sore that Bush dodged the UN's attempt to protest Saddam, then Ha Ha crybaby! When you and your Socialist comrades in France and Germany decide to join the civilized world, Americans might then begin to take you seriously.

For a guy who claims to agree with Bush's decision to eliminate Saddam, you look quite silly posting trash like this. You are your own worst enemy! Dismissed!

Devin P.

Devin P.

PS Grow up Canadian!

I think it has a lot to do with Bush's credibility. I think we were lied to about why Iraq was invaded. The U.S. Government has already backed off it's assertion that Saddam had ties to Osama Bin Laden(see statements by Cheney and Bush). No Weapons of mass desruction have ever been found and many government officials(Albright, Kennedy, et al) are questioning the validity of that claim. So I'm curious, why did Bush go in? Can you formulate a coherent paragraph outlining why and support it with something from a reputable source. All my little quotes come off of CNN's website. Try it, try not going off on one of your usual rants and come up with something concrete.

Ahhh CNN,lol! That explains it! Still stuck on the issue of "why" huh? That explains why you never answered my question. Let's try again, shall we? Which is the lesser of two evils in your opinion...
1) Bush lies (not my opinion) to topple a vicious dictator and his regime, eliminating the atrocities they (Saddam and sons) executed on their own Iraqi civilians.

2) Saddam and his sons remain the leader and continue to rape, torture and execute anyone and everyone they see fit.

This requires an answer of number one or number two. It's that friggin" simple!

Scottish my Lad,
I'm truly hurt. I answered your question forthrightly quite a while back. Go look through my posts and you'll see it.

You've never answered any of my questions "forthrightly", lol. You danced around every topic like it never existed. Nice try.

If you've taken the time to read anything I've ever written, I've always said that getting rid of Saddam was a good idea. What I do take issue with is the fact that it sems that the world was misled as to the reasons why the US went in. There are no weapons of mass destruction, there are no links to Al-Queda. Your own president has backed off on the second assertion and there is an interesting article on CNN today that states

"that after five months, its 1,500 experts have found no WMD, delivery systems or laboratories involved in developing them."

It also goes on to make the point, which I agree with, that the war was justifiable nontheless because basically Sadam was an SOB who deserved to be gotten rid of. If they would just come out and say that, I'd be very happy. And yes, I agree that taking out Sadam was the lesser of two evils.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Obviously, you are accusing the US of invading Iraq solely to steal their oil. Now let's see you make your case. What facts a re you ready to provide to support your position. What do you have big shot? Where's your proof?

Devin P.

"Taking out Saddam" was not one of the two choices. You DID NOT answer the question! Once again you avoided an accurate answer. You know it, and I know it. Nice try though. Very sneaky answer.

I may be incredibly dense but I'm not getting you. Your choices were:

1) Bush lies (not my opinion) to topple a vicious dictator and his regime, eliminating the atrocities they (Saddam and sons) executed on their own Iraqi civilians.

2) Saddam and his sons remain the leader and continue to rape, torture and execute anyone and everyone they see fit.

I said taking out Sadam was a good idea.I think that's answer #1.

Lieing about the reasons for going into Iraq, not a good idea however.

NOW you've answered it accurately. Was that so hard?

Learn to read better

Work on not being so EVASIVE!

Devin P.

I was reading your posts perfectly. You were cleverly giving your own interpretation of an answer without actually saying what was painful for you to finally admit. I NEVER once gave "getting rid of Saddam" as one of the choices to answer that question and you know it. You're pissed off because I caught you being sneaky. I appreciate you finally answering the question yo fought so hard to avoid.

You're splitting hairs there Scotty

I disagree! I think I hit the nail on the head and you didn't like it one bit.

get over it coward.

Devin P.

First of all, nobody lied to you, because you don't count. I know that hurts your little feelings, and I understand that's why you and your Socialist comrades fron Germany and France will continue to whine for years to come about "ties to UBL" and WMD. Nobody cares! Bush was absolutely right in getting rid of both thugs, who, by the way genius, WERE THE WMD! Get it fool?

One more time genius: 9/11 changed the attitude of this country (not yours) about terrorists. Bush vowed to the world that he would eliminate the type of people who vowed to kill Americans. Saddam, a wealthy Middle eastern tyrant, very much like UBL, certainly qualified. Case closed Mr. anti-American.

You have posted again as though Bush's credibility is the issue here. You are wrong spineless one. It is your credibility on the line on this forum. Americans are and have been fine with what Bush has and continues to do. You are on the outside looking in, and you haven't a clue. You keep bringing up issues that have already been decided in the minds of the majority of Americans. If tomorrow the media announces that US soldiers found hidden nuclear weapons in Iraq, it won't be that big a deal to us, we already gave Bush the nod long ago. Of course you may have to go scurrying back under your rock, or fishing hole. Dismissed!

Devin P.

...time will tell that it has been a major mistake of Bush attack Iraq.

One day this will be the obvious that even you will have to admit it.

I would not be surprised if Saddam would return to power again and UBL is pulling the strings like he did before anyway...
-----
Beware of Commies and Mutts!

Why don't you prove that they are alive? Even if they were how would you like to be in their shoes? If either of them were unfortunate enough to have survived, they would simply be two crippled old pansies scurrying around trying to dodge the inevitable swat of a an oversized US fly-swatter. Who knows, maybe our CIA has Saddam on a hook, serving as a dart board, in a basement somewhere just for kicks? In any case Stoeckl, don't get your hopes too high that Saddam will someday be back in power. I assure you, Mr. Social Failure, that his own people will mop the streets with his lifeless remains. Dismissed!

Devin P.

You've been watching too many re-runs of the A team. Once again I see that there's nothing of substance in your replies. Just the same old yammering about how great you are and how wrong any one else is. Still not a shred of evidence to counter anything I've said.

" Mr President, why did you go into Iraq?
"It was because of the connections to Al-Queda"
"Uh sir, we haven't found any connections"
"It was because of the Weapons of Mass Destruction"
"Ahh, no we haven't found that they exist either"

Sadam was a nasty little dictator who deserved to be thrown out of power because of the tyrant he was. I JUST DON'T BELIEVE THAT'S WHY HE WAS THROWN OUT. I think, that more likely, he was percieved as a threat to U.S. interests in the middle East and was eliminated because of that. If you're so hot to go after real terrorist bases, go after Saudi Arabia, where a large majority of funding fot Al-Queda comes from. Or Syria, or Libya.
If you do that I'll retract everything I had to say about Bush, but not till then.

Where's YOUR shred of evidence to back your accusations? Oh, that's right, I forgot. You heard it on the TV, lol. Get a grip!

So you never saw the report where Chaney backed off on any links between Iraq and Al-Queda. And you haven't read the UN weapons Inspection report prepared by Hans Blix. And you haven't taken into account the fact that you're occupying the entire country and still haven't found shred one of evidence for WMD. Time to wake up and smell the coffee. You're living in a fantasy land.

Now where's your evidence? Come on big mouth, let's have it.

Devin P.

Hans Blix is a QUACK, and holds little credibility here. How can he give an accurate report when Saddam wouldn't let them complete their inspections. Hmmm, I wonder why he was afraid to let us complete those inspections. As far as WMD are concerned, we aren't finished searching. Even if we don't find any, it proves nothing. It certainly doesn't prove they didn't or don't exist. My guess is they moved them to a neighboring country. They may have found something already but are concealing facts for security purposes. The fact that the government doesn't confide in YOU doesn't mean they haven't made progress.

I give up. That has to be the lamest response I've read from you. usually you're much better. Come on, if they'd have found something they'd have let the public know. It would justify everything that they've claimed and would be a HUGE public relations coup. Do you really think that George Bush would let his closest Ally, Tony Blair, twist in the wind if he had something that would save his political career. In case you've missed it, the scandle in Britain over the supposed irregularities regarding WMD has threatened to topple his government. You're reaching with that one

YOU HAVE DONE ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO PROVE THAT WMD DON'T EXIST!

Have you personally checked Syria?

Why do you not consider Saddam a WMD? (be careful, on 9/11, things like Hijackers and jetliners were responsible for mass murders)

Have you personally searched Iraq for WMD?

Then shut up!

You are again making a hugr idiot of yourself.

You can't hide your haste to accuse Bush of stealing oil.

Devin P.

And what does the piece of trash that you posted have anything to do with "whether he was justified in going to war"? I'll answer that for you: NOTHING!

Maybe you need to Re Read the post. This man has a history of using people for his own personal gain. Do a little research on his life, and you will see. That is if you can find the time

"Maybe you need to Re Read the post."

No, I have absolutely no need to read that garbage again.

"This man has a history of using people for his own personal gain."

As do many other successful Americans. Bush hired employees throughout his life to get things done. I would imagine that his employees voluntarily applied for their jobs, don't you agree Fred? Or do you thing that Bush held a gun to their heads when he provided an opportunity for them? That doesn't make much sense, does it Fred? People use each other all the time, and there's nothing wrong with it, so what's your point?

Devin Price

PS The folks from Little Rock say hello to San Diego!

Do a little research on his life, and you will see. That is if you can find the time

How about a little "research" on your life. If credibility is the key here, then your posts would mean squat here.

Facts, lol! Why, because YOU call them facts? Nice try. I'm glad you cited CNN and of all people, the biggest sot on the planet, Kennedy, lmao! I'm even happier that you posted so much negative propaganda. It further proves your agenda, and drops your credibility down to around Herman's level. Of course the democrats are trying to make our president look evil. THEY WANT HIS JOB! Duh-uh!!! In the future, please don't portray your comments as "fact" just because it's "what you heard". That is being wreckless with your credibility. But I'd be willing to give you the benefit of the doubt if you can substantiate any of your accusations. Perhaps you'll make a believer of me yet. By the way, every politician on the planet came from money and got their job because of family or money. So what's your point. All rich people have some skeletons in their closet. Perhaps you could write to CNN and have them give you a rundown on your buddy Kennedy, who's family has the biggest record of SCANDLE on the planet. I bet they'd portray him as a saint, lol. Great sources ya' got there buddy.

Bush will not make it in 04, and be the 1st president in U.S. History not voted back in during war. Maybe he wont get us all killed until then.

Did I miss where Bush has "gotten us all killed" in the past? What are you talking about Fred?

Devin P.

PS You aren't still blaming your lack of work on Bush, are you?

... that such a man runs the most powerful nation of the world. The outcome already shows in the war on Iraq.
One can only hope that Bush will not become president again. I avoided the word "re-elected" because such a kind of election is doubtful in the eyes of every democrate.

A person who gets the majority of the votes becomes #2? Hmm....

I am curious as to whether Arnold Schwarzenegger will become governer of California. A man who performed for decades a "sport" which is utterly contaminated with the use of steroids that are known to change the personality and lead to aggressive behaviour as well as a hard to control sexual drive.
-----
Beware of Commies and Mutts!

"... that such a man runs the most powerful nation of the world. The outcome already shows in the war on Iraq."

Obviously, the thought never entered your pea brain that maybe America is the most powerful nation in the world BECAUSE OF GUYS LIKE BUSH. it's simple cause and effect Stoeckl, you know, the way you bring the average IQ level of this forum way down whenever you post here?

"One can only hope that Bush will not become president again."

Ha Ha Stoeckl!

"I avoided the word "re-elected" because such a kind of election is doubtful in the eyes of every democrate. "

What were the elections like in Germany in the early 1940's? (remember that "glass house' thing Stoeckl?)

"I am curious as to whether Arnold Schwarzenegger will become governer of California."

I'll bet you wish Arnold's father were running!

Devin P.

Arnold's father...LMAO! Good one!

that YOU didn't post that "toilette paper" propaganda before Kanuk did! You're slipping Stoeckl!

lol very funny, yet very scary. Great post man!!

Where have you been hiding?

Devin P.

I was wondering where you disappeared to when I responded to your posts in the thread below that Tommyboy started. You forgot to respond to the questions I asked in relation to your posts. That's okay, I'll ask them here. In your post below... http://forums.kingsnake.com/view.php?id=190689,192942 you asked a few questions. I explained in depth what I did for a living but you never revealed what you do. What do you do for a living Fred? Also I was curious to know why you brought up minorities in that post and what it has to do with any of the topics we've been discussing. I also asked you to please sign your posts accurately as I did. By the way, you stated in a previous post that you were Devin Price from Little Rock, Arkansas. I see there is a Devin P. posting here. Are you the same person? Lastly, you never answered my question as to the lesser of two evils. Number one or number two!

My name is Devin Price and I would like the record show that I do not go by the name "sobec"! That would be Fred! I wouldn't want my pride in America to be confused with his anti-American views. Also, I'd like the record to reflect the fact that I have a job, unlike Fred! Thank You.

Devin P.

PS Unlike Fred, I do not live in San Diego