**Take for example the hypo looking offspring you produce that are triple hets....Maybe the "hypo" gene is expressing it self sorta like a "marker."**
Something is going on....and I don't have an answer. It first started about 10 years ago when I bred a albino to a lavender and one of the double hets came out looking "hypo", but yet ALL the babies were double hets. And of course breeding the Ghost and Hypo have produced some CRAZY looking double hets in color and pattern.
**We all know we just use the term "hypo" to describe the way the animal looks and we don't know for sure if it is true hypomelanism going on or not**
All the snakes that I have produced and am calling hypo came from a hypo cal king. I have produced NUMEROUS cal kings that look hypo, but I do not call them that. To me it should genetically predictable (recessive) and not just a look. But I do not know why when mixing recessive genes the hets are looking different.
**I know we've discussed this elsewhere, but do you think there are different "lavender" lines. Much like there are different "hypo" lines? Are they compatible? Are there different degrees of hypomelanism? Or are there different degrees in which an animal expresses Tyrosinase Positive? Are there super forms?**
Without a doubt there are numerous recessive genes in the cal king world that are not compatible.......but us humans like to label everything and therein lies the confusion. Terms like albino, hypo, hyper, etc. are legit genetic terms and then we add stuff like lavender, blizzard, snow, ghost, purple passion, etc into the mix lol

Kerby...
-----
Life is like a bunch of fish in an aquarium....we all get along (bonding) until I want to eat you....and I do.

