>>That is false, everyone knows that N. nivea possesses the most potent venom than any other Naja subspecies.
And you base that statement on what, exactly? This is yet another one of those rather poorly substantiated statements that floats round the grey literature and has become accepted as a tablet of stone, without any reference whatsoever to the original research that led to that claim.
BGF compiled the data available from the literature, nothing more, nothing less. That's what came out. That's the DATA.
There may well be different figures around for the same species (after all, LD50 can differ hugely between individuals, populations, subspecies and so on, and they may well differ between different lots of mice as well). Moreover, as we are continuously re-establishing, they don't mean sh*t as far as assessing the danger to humans is concerned.
I'd agree that Naja nieva is probably more likely to kill you than N. atra, but let's not confuse that issue with the available LD50 data.
Cheers,
Wolfgang
-----
WW Home