Well yeah, for one thing, his coat is black. It's not easy to take well defined pictures of black dogs and cats because cameras do not react as well to it.
Second issue is that my pictures are lower resolution than yours (intentionally, so detail is lost.)
Third issue is, his coat is not 100% recovered from what his old owners did. And I don't expect it to be for another year or so. But it's a good 95% by now.
But to humor us both and share some of my photography, I'll post a few more examples.

This is from a decent distance and a nearly full body shot, not up close. You can see his white and gray furs are well defined, even at this distance, and that his black turns textureless. That's photography for you, can't really be helped.

Up close like this it does show a bit more.

Even from this distance, his coat is shining and there is good texture and a uniform color. And this was taken before the pictures I posted, his coat is even better now.

Or how about this one? It's closer to the up close shots you gave, and despite the obvious fade from the whole black fur effect, it looks identical to the face shot you provided.
But seeing is believing, I can explain this all day long and yet, these are just photos, and Ollie is still recovering from his damage. I have no doubt in one year he will look like a completely different dog.
Again, it's not me saying that raw is worse or better. But I have been to the Siberian show in North Cal that occured about 5 months ago or so, and I've seen a few raw feeders, as well as a few other brand feeders. The raw feeders standing out from 500 yards? Not quite, but if you looked up close, you sure could tell the difference if you knew the dog is fed raw. But just looking around? Not so much of a difference.
I do smell bias 