Reptile & Amphibian Forums

Since the things are going so well in post-war Iraq Donald Rumsfeld (who was in charge to order the things in Iraq after the war) was depraved from his duty by George Dabbljuh.

Now Condoleeza Rice has been assigned to clear the mess.

According to corresponding reports of different TV stations Donald Rumsfeld learned from this out of the newspaper.

I ask myself if the things are going so well in post-war Iraq (80% blah blah blah and the enthusiasm of the civilians for the U.S. troops) why Donald has been sacked?!?

On top of that he had to learn of this out of the newspapers. What a disgrace!

But surely the reports of killed U.S. soldiers (almost one every day, sometimes two), attacks on the UN or Iraqis who cooperate and demonstrations against the occupiers are just forged by the medias (as froggy makes us believe).

So froggy, why had Donald been sacked if all goes so well?

Hope you forgive me my provocative question (you know, nothing personal but I think you need to sing the song of your employer, that's just it).
-----
Beware of Commies and Mutts!

I don't remember Froggy denying that there is turmoil as you are suggesting he did. Can you find that post where he suggests that everything is calm over there. His reference was to the civilians and you know it! Stop trying to put a spin on Froggy's post to make yourself look like you have a point. It will NEVER work. Your post once again is weak at best. Your lame attempt to once again make it seem like the civilians don't want us there is pathetic. Don't preach what you don't know.

Surely froggy is right that some of the civilians are glad that the U.S. troops are in Iraq and that they got rid of Saddam.

But no one can say right now if this is the majority or the minority. I think it is the majority but a significant part of the people there hate the U.S.

Furthermore rioters from adjourning countries come to Iraq in order to support those who don't want the U.S.

This, along with the actions of Israel makes the region to a barrel of gun-powder that is going to explode.

Bush sen. had had his reasons to stop his army on the border.

Let me lose some word to Israel:
They came into this region and installed a country in the middle of people who had lived there for ages and ages.

It would be the same if the indians would return powerful in say 1000 years to the U.S. from places all over the world claiming this is their land and you have either to leave or be ruled by them.

And many of you would have to leave their homes and go away. Would you accept this?

I think this is a good comparison what happened in the Middle East after WWII.

I believe that the actions of the Israelis are the basic reason for all the islamic terror that we are facing. Remember: The U.S. always supported Israel, prevented judgements against Israel in the UN security council with its veto and a significant part of the U.S. citizens are Jews. This will make you always a target to Islamic terrorists.

And invading Iraq will fule the hatred of the Islamic nations against the U.S. even more.
-----
Beware of Commies and Mutts!

What do you mean "no one can say" if it's the majority or the minority? You have a guy here (Froggy) with FIRST HAND KNOWLEDGE of how the civilians feel and you refuse to accept his word as truth because it upsets you to think he's right, and he is. And stop acting like there wasn't unrest before we got there! You claim to know so much about that region yet you fail to acknowledge that this has been a powder keg for a thousand plus years. Give me a break. The simple fact is, whether you choose to accept it or not(not that we give a crap what you think), is that we got rid of a mass murdering, torturing, sick piece of manure and gave the Iraqis a chance to start a new life. One where they can sleep at night knowing Saddam and his parasitic sons won't pull them out of bed one night to rape them, gas them, run over their heads with their Mercedes or whatever sick atrocity they feel suits them on a particular evening. But we all know that none of that madness compairs to the atrocities suffered at the hands of our own brutal dictator (Bush) who you claim lied to get rid of that spineless, satanic bottom-feeder. That's the worst! We definitely should have left Saddam to terrorize that nation for years to come, right Stoeckl? I think what seperates you and I is that when I go to sleep, if I dream about those poor civilians and what they experienced as a result of the Husseins atrocities, I call it a nightmare. You probably wake up smiling!

"The simple fact is, whether you choose to accept it or not(not that we give a crap what you think), is that we got rid of a mass murdering, torturing, sick piece of manure and gave the Iraqis a chance to start a new life. "

Correct. I agree with you. Isn't it nice?

But maybe you should be man enough to agree with the following:

Bush did it not because of this reason mentioned above but for the money, oil and the influence in this region. If the same would have happened in a region without oil and stratetic significance Bush would not have given a damn what happen to the people.

That's part one. Part two is, that the whole things is so poorly planed that it's leading into a disaster. Just ask Donald Rumsfeld Duck.

"The simple fact is, whether you choose to accept it or not(not that we give a crap what you think), is that we got rid of a mass murdering, torturing, sick piece of manure and gave the Iraqis a chance to start a new life."

Yeahh... But what will be the price and on top of that the final result...
-----
Beware of Commies and Mutts!

Ahh we just love that Black gold Who cares if we have to kill people for it. Thats the Bush motto. You'd have to be blind not to see it.

There you are! I was wondering if we were gonna' see you posting here again. You still haven't answered why you asked me about minorities and why you brought it up and if you consider yourself a minority. You also forgot to post what you do for a living like I did when you guys asked me the same questions. How bout it?

By the way, the fact that you believe this war is about that "black gold" shows how ignorant of any facts you are. Parroting that Crenoid Moore isn't helping your cause in the least either. You're better off going back to making things up.

Chris Kennard

Make sure you change the subject again so as to completely avoid the questions yet again, LOL.

Only an unemployed 40 year-old loser from San Diego would talk $hit about oil. But, since you are too lazy to work, you probably don't need a car. Your self absorption will forever prevent you from acknowledging the big picture. But it's always fun to throw you arounf these forums like a rag doll.

Devin P.

If I agree with you, That will make me "man enough"? LMAO! Now that's funny. I'll agree with you when you say something that makes sense. There is absolutely zero bases for your idiotic comments. That they are "your opinions" doesn't make them accurate and that I don't agree with your idiocy makes me man enough to be proud of my country. Just because you say that Iraq is going to wind up being a cesspool doesn't make it so. We all know how much you pray that this will be the case, but it's not. I think you've proven time and time again that your unfounded statements lack any level of research beyond the toilette paper you read in your sad country. Ya' know, I think maybe you're threatened by jealousy that Iraq may just become a better country than the one you're living in, putz! In any case Stoeckl, keep those posts coming. I can't wait til the Boa crowd comes over to see how much respect you have for our country, lol.

You can't answer that simple question.

You are clueless.

Devin P.

All within 6 months! Bush 2004!

Devin P.

You know that Rumsfeld has done good if Stroeckl is blabbering about him. Ha Ha Stoeckl!

Devin P.