We (Sweden) have all the time had more types, the bigger darker, longer coated, and smaller sleeker more shortcoated, and all between, all which were prestent on Malta and in England. I think US have had all the time a more uniform PH breed? Except maybe Kamaraj, who also had more similarities with the UK and Swe lines, as she used Merymut lines, which of course much in UK and most in Sweden is based on. I think the difference is to find there. And to compare them with Dobermanns, any PH, NO WAY! Its to make it all too easy for yourself. If you think they are similar, you are the one who is BLIND!
I think the breeding in US have been crazy in the past. And in a few places still are. Linebreeding too far, using the same ground dogs in pedigres, over and over again, until the dog has the same 2-4 dogs EVERYWHERE in its pedigree, its there in the background, though the dogs in front have new and different kennelnames. No wonder you get health issues.
I assume you Lori, and Kim and others are going on about the Ramsan heritage in US. So lets see what you're picking on, its not like I or we in Europe, if you ever can pile upp such a large number of people like that, have "invented" this look, or Ramsan, or our PHs don't descend from anything but where grewn out of the grass here. Ramsans mother is a bitch you admire, and from a litter you very much admire, right? (though she had excessive white, and an eweneck, so did some of her siblings too, they also had more angulation in rear, than many "pure" US PHs) His father is half Shema, half Maltese/Merymut/Twinley. This "look" you describe can be seen in great specimens in earlier UK dogs. And also on Malta there are big, dark dogs. When will you get it that ALL our PHs, yours and ours, descend from just a handful of dogs brought to UK, and some more recent Maltese imports?
The only things I do agree with, is that necks here can be "eweish", some, and some have bent noses, (I see that, nose-thing, more in the Finnish PHs though) and we do care less about excessive white and flecking, but we do have more diversed pedigrees, we permit more dogs to be used, we're not as strict as you, thus giving us more to choose from, and easier to get ahead, and all which make us able to achive PHs that are known worldwide as the best* PHs, and also to not exclude as many dogs as you, makes it easier to keep the breed healthy. *Scandinavian PHs do have that reputation, and I feel its not wrongly so. Where did you all have to go when the "pure US PH" breeding went bad from too much line and inbreeding for too long?
Where would you be now, if you wouldn't have?
I dont like that a mob of people in US want to lobby for "the crap scandinavian/Swedish PH" to all judges and all who want to listen, and solka ner vårt rykte, tillslut slår det rot. (sorry, couldnt find the words in English, as i have to battle in a language that isnt mine, we can try mine, if you want to?
then you'd be the disabled one.
Farao Anubis Pharaoh Hounds, Sweden