Reptile & Amphibian Forums

Welcome to kingsnake.com's message board system. Here you may share and discuss information with others about your favorite reptile and amphibian related topics such as care and feeding, caging requirements, permits and licenses, and more. Launched in 1997, the kingsnake.com message board system is one of the oldest and largest systems on the internet.

Click here for Dragon Serpents
Click for ZooMed
Click for 65% off Shipping with Reptiles 2 You

Well no wonder

sobek Nov 09, 2003 01:30 AM

lol sorry had to post it.. You gotta admit, they are not far off

Replies (15)

steve.AC Nov 09, 2003 05:47 AM

And here is my contribution, and this one is real, I think.
Image

FastEddie Nov 09, 2003 12:09 PM

Since we're on the subject of pictures, is that pic you posted of yourself on the Boa forum an actual human being?

Ed

steve.AC Nov 09, 2003 12:30 PM

Yes, its me, and my wife ajusted it a little.

steve

FastEddie Nov 09, 2003 12:14 PM

This is nothing compared to a picture of Steve AC and yourself. It would be awsome if you could post that here somehow.

Ed

PS You've consistently lost every argument in this forum since your first post here. Are ridiculous pictures the only thing you've got left?

steve.AC Nov 09, 2003 12:32 PM

Thanks, but I see that actually no one on here won or lost, its all our personal oppinions, so if you dont like oppinions then you shouldn't be here.

ps. I see that you have changed your name yet again as to hide who you really are, now thats rediculous.

steve

FastEddie Nov 09, 2003 01:26 PM

Your spelling is "rediculous"!

Ed

steve.AC Nov 09, 2003 01:54 PM

ok it's you, the guy who's always going on about everyones spelling to make out that he's better than everyone..

steve

sobek Nov 09, 2003 03:02 PM

Here is an Idea. If you spent half as much timelooking you the facts, as you did running peoples post though spell checkers,, You might understand.. All i see from u is, "You cant prove he did't have them." Well in that case you cant prove that Mickey Mouse was not behind all this. LOOK OUT DISNEY, you may be next.... BUsh makes it up as he goes along....

FastEddie Nov 09, 2003 11:25 PM

Bush 2004!

*Cheers*

Ed

sobek Nov 10, 2003 12:18 AM

lol I don’t know buddy. I think Clark could give him a good run. We need a man "Or woman" that knows *war*, not one that plays cowboy. Plus he is from Arkansas, as am I and my "Hero" Bill. Aside.. The problem with democrats, "among others" is they have too many people running. We can hope they get their act together.

lol Ross should run again, Man he cracks me up..

FastEddie Nov 10, 2003 12:46 AM

The problem with your Democratic Presidential candidates is that they are a comedy cast. Can you say "Al Sharpton"?

Bashing "the rich" and successful people in America doesn't have mass appeal. Those in this country who don't mind working for a living (the majority) don't want the freeloaders in this country having much of a voice, so your candidates don't have much appeal. Sharpton might give Clark a run for his money!

Ed

sobek Nov 10, 2003 01:21 AM

>>Can you say "Al Sharpton"?

Al Sharpton.

Whats your problem with him?

The only rich I hear him talking about is the ones that step on people to get there.

Be honest whats your problem with him? And how is Clinton a Bum? He is better off then you and I and then some...

FastEddie Nov 10, 2003 01:23 PM

"Al Sharpton.

Whats your problem with him?"

He's a sensational, racist idiot for starters. He's to be taken as seriously as a cartoon character. I don't need to elaborate on why Al Sharpton os a moron.

"The only rich I hear him talking about is the ones that step on people to get there."

What exactly is "step on people to get there"? Could it mean CREATING JOBS for others? After all the Bush family has employed many people over the years. Is that really "stepping on them"? What's wrong with having a job?

"And how is Clinton a Bum?"

Remember he said "I did not have sexual relations with that woman" in front of how many millions of people? Clinton was disliked by his own military for obvious reasons. He was responsible, like most Liberals, for wanting to see America weak.

"He is better off then you and I and then some..."

Speak for yourself. I'm extremely satisfied with my life. Clinton doesn't bother me the way Bush bothers you. I think it was great that he was banging Monica in the white House. It's obvious that Hillary is merely a political alliance, so I don't have a problem with Billy being acting like a single horny guy. However, he didn't take care of the business of protecting this country and THAT'S WHY HE'S A BUM!

Ed

PS Clinton is a rich man. Why do you overlook that fact in your disdain for the rich? Michael Moore is also rich, why do you love the guy so much?

sobek Nov 10, 2003 01:38 PM

Are you that slow?

I have no problem with "Rich" people. Please don’t twist my words to fit your idea.

Yes the Bush family "step" on people to get rich. Do a search on their history, and see all the failed Business Jr. had, that he put little to nothing into, but sold out for Big bucks, leaving his partners Broke, some of whom went to jail.

"STEP" = to use people.. Get it? It’s not hard to grasp..

You said: he "Clinton" didn't take care of the business of protecting this country and THAT'S WHY HE'S A BUM!

9/11 buddy, BUSH FAILED US ALL!!! He is that Bum you speak of..

FastEddie Nov 10, 2003 04:49 PM

You claim to not have a problem with "the rich"??? Are you that slow? Consider the following:

Posted here by sobek 9/24/03:

"Why is htis not more of an Issue?

Richest Americans Get Even Richer - Fortunes of America's richest up 10% in year
September 18, 2003

By Theresa Agovino, AP

New York, New York - The economy is improving for the super rich. After two years of declines, the total net worth of America's richest people rose 10 percent to $955 billion this year from 2002, according to Forbes magazine's annual ranking of the nation's 400 wealthiest individ"

For your information, you posted this garbage as though "rich" people were a plague, so PLEASE don't tell me that you don't have a problem with "the rich"!

People "use" other people all the time in a capitalistic society. Get used to it sobek. Some people (employer)hire (use) people (employees)to get a job done for themselves, BUT THEY PAY THEM. The employee uses the employer to get money. You see sobek, in the USA it's isn't criminal to 'use' other people. Face it, Bush annoys you because he is successful and you are not.

9/11 was Clinton's legacy. When Clinton ignored the importance of the military (in favor of socialistic programs)for eight years, he created an opportunity for terrorists to take advantage of a weakened America. Bush didn't have enough time in office to stop the bleeding. Rodney already explained this to ya. What's the problem?

Ed

Site Tools