Actually the taxonomy of the boa constrictor group is in much need of further attention,(MHO)There currently exists,a series of recognized subspecies,however,the criteria for their identification is loosely defined at best,and,subject to interpretation,and,antiquated,or,incomplete meristics data,therefore it is only close to accurate from a field collection perspective,in other words if you had the published information,and,found yourself collecting specimens from the known areas of their accepted ranges...identification could be made fairly easily,in most cases.(theoreticlly!)without exact locality data,it becomes much more of a visual comparison based on an overall look...it would be nice if we could simply count their dorsal markings,or,scale rows,alone,and,know beyond all doubt,that "this is a blah-blah-blah". what we tend to do instead is make an educated guess,based on visual assessment of the overall "look"...which is what I did with the animal you posted above.(it's just my educated guess,based on years of looking at different boas,from various localities.
)