Hey Vake, I also thought at one time they were simply pattern aberrancies. I would think, 'this guy has got some b@lls selling these normal but aberrant columbians for 3x normal price!
There are people out there - I believe it was the people from Giant Snake Keepers recently (forgive me if i'm wrong)- who were focused on proving this 'gene' out and did produce several circleback laddertails.
This year I also produced some. I bred a 8' female with a very stong circleback/connecting pattern and lots of orange to a orange pastel male who was 'sort of' circleback.
She dropped 37 live babies, 9 slugs and 2 stillborn on 5-21.
Out of these, most are circlebacks, and the rest are either 'semi-circleback' or fairly normal in regards to saddle positioning and pattern.
I did get some INTENSE color out of those babies, and I even had 1 baby about 70% striped! who knows how that happened.who were focused on proving this 'gene' out and did produce several circleback laddertails.
This year I also produced some. I bred a 8' female with a very stong circleback/connecting pattern and lots of orange to a orange pastel male who was 'sort of' circleback.
She dropped 37 live babies, 9 slugs and 2 stillborn on 5-21.
Out of these, most are circlebacks, and the rest are either 'semi-circleback' or fairly normal in regards to saddle positioning and pattern.
I did get some INTENSE color out of those babies, and I even had 1 baby about 70% striped! who knows how that happened..
SO, with that said, I have reason to believe that the gene is co-dominant, kind of like that of a hypo/salmon boa. I you breed one circleback/laddertail to a normal, you should get approximately half normal half circleback - BUT!!!! - the thing is knowing if that circleback parent was produced by circlebacks or if it was just a boa with slight aberrancies....
Give me a call, we can talk more..
Those first babies have shed and fed twice and are ready to go.
This second bunch with the circlebacks have just shed a couple of days ago.
Thanks , Joe Rollo