Yeah, me too. It is a refreshing change from the norm. Not to imply that burm talk is in any way boring, it just tends to be the same things over and over.
You brought up a few really good points here. You're right, it technically should be the indian python forum with all sub species included. Obviously the forum name is based on the sheer number of pet burms kept in captivity and the volume of burm owners that would need to post. I personally think that to this day a large portion of burm owners are probably still unaware that indian pythons are even related to burms, or don't even know of it's existence. By this I am not referring to the dedicated herpers that have a genuine desire to learn all they can about these animals and that take their hobby seriously. In this I refer to the large percentage of people that buy a burm in a pet shop because it is neat, or cute, or may get big and will impress their friends. In my opinion these people rarely take the time to really learn about the animal or it's origins. Sad but true, and while there are pet shops and money oriented, thoughtless breeders, this is an inevitability.
The thing that P****es me off the most is when breeders cross breed the indian python with the burm so that they have a legal loophole that enables them to ship the animals over state lines. This is utterly irresponsible in my opinion as the indian pythons are so rare and are seriously threatened with extinction in the wild. With this reckless practice in a few years who can really say which indians are pure and which or not. If the only remaining gene pool is in captivity then it is our responsibility to ensure that it is untainted and kept pure. I am not usually one for more laws of any kind, but I do wish they would pass a law making it illegal to crossbreed an endangered species.
Another good point you brought up is concerning the evolution of rocks and other reptiles on the same continent that clearly demonstrate different defense mechanisms. While I agree that no two animals evolve the same way, I still stand by my theory on the rock pythons and why they are so confrontational. And here's why: It is in the fact that no two animals evolve the same way that it is entirely likely. Depending on the regions and the habitats and many other factors, animals have evolved a wide array of defense mechanisms over the eons. And different behaviors can be found in the same area or habitat too. Some may evolve to flee quickly, others may have evolved to stand and fight, while others may have evolved a hard outer shell, or spikes, or even toxins that they may emit, ooze or spit. Some animals evolved smaller and smaller so as to avoid predation (like the ball, which curls into a tight ball to become even smaller), and others evolved great size to avoid predation. And some evolve elaborate camouflage to better blend in and disappear into their background. Whatever the case, it all has obviously worked incredibly well otherwise all these species would long be dead. But it is because of this wide array of different methods of evolving to cope with the environment that lends more merrit to the idea that this is exactly why rock pythons behave this way. Because it has worked.
I too find it very interesting that rocks have such great eyesight. A lot of snake species from africa also seem to share this physical attribute. Mambas, boomslangs, cobras, etc. In addition to this they are all very agile snakes with very acute vision and seemingly higher than usual snake intelligence. I personally think that the reason for this (evolutionarily speaking) is that having evolved in a much more open and sparse land these species and species like them have had to evolve more of a preditory method of obtaining food, rather than the usual method of choice for large snakes, "lay and wait and ambush".
The most amazing behavior regarding subduing prey that I have ever witnessed in my life involves rock pythons. This from back in the early 80's when I would put live food items in the snake's cages. (These days I always feed pre-killed and so it's a very controlled environment and there isn't oportunity to witness something different or rare). But in those days I often placed several bunnies or guinea pigs in with the rock pythons and they often did the most amazing thing. They would grab one with their mouth and constrict it in a regular manner and then feel about with their tail and locate another animal and grab and constrict it with their tail and lower body. It was just incredible to me for this snake to be aware of other animals in the cage as it was seemingly preoccupied killing another. Now, most other snakes are lost in the single minded objective of subduing the prey in their mouth. The rocks on the other hand would often seem to remember the presence of additional animals and would find and kill them with their tail.
Keep the rock talk flowing,. I'm digging on it in a big way.
>>Damn, i'm enjoying this "conversation", aren't you? It's refreshing after so many burm posts...So let's go on with our rock-talk before it's considered off topic or something. (Just for the record, i think this should be called the Indian python forum. By calling it the Burmese python forum it means that Molurus Mulurus or Pimbura are just as outsiders as any other python, but an "Indian python forum" would include all subspecies).
>>Well, you shouldn't focus to much on the animal-location thing when trying to figure character and personality about that given animal, because Africa (in this case) his home to many other snakes and still they are all diferent. Ball pythons don't seem to be on the look out all the time like rocks. Retics live among burms in Asia, so how to explain such oposite behaviours?!(just my ideas, they don't have to be more valid than anyone else's)
>> I also find curious how rocks seem to see so well. Whenever i open the cage the turn around and rush for the door. Those little critters are smart...
-----
"If I had 365 enemies it would only take a year out of my life to settle all scores." Mia Miselfani