This message will also be posted in the Herp Law/CITES Forum.
Reading a post regarding potential captive hybridization of box turtles (eastern and ornate) over on the Box Turtle forum got me to wondering:
Suppose Species X has a range from California to New Mexico (states used for purposes of discussion--any similarity between this post and existing laws is purely coincidental). Species Y, in the same genus, ranges from New Mexico to Arkansas. The observant reader will notice that the species' ranges overlap in NM. Now let's say California prohibits the keeping of Species X, Arkansas prevents the keeping of Species Y, and NM prevents keeping either species.
Hypothetical scenario: I procure a male Species X from Arizona (where, for purposes of discussion, this is legal) and a female Species Y from Texas (where again, for purposes of discussion, it's legal). I breed the two and end up with hybrid offspring, visually distinct from either "pure" species.
Would a person be allowed to keep these hybrids in CA or AR, where one of the parents would've been illegal, or in NM, where both species are illegal? My scenario assumes the ability to distinguish these hybrids from naturally-occuring, uncrossed specimens.
I pose this question because as some folks are acutely aware, species occurring naturally in some states are illegal to keep, though some may be desireable captives. I'm not asking about the ethics or opinions of hybridization itself, but merely the legality of keeping such a hybrid in a state where one or both parent species occurs naturally.
-----
Chris McMartin
www.mcmartinville.com
I'm Not a Herpetologist, but I Play One on the Internet



