Yes. However, it's not just changing the appearance of the snake, although that is a frequent result (however unintentional). It is surgically removing the venom glands.
We humans frequently surgically alter our pets, as in spaying and neutering dogs and cats. It is the reason behind the surgical alteration that raises so many hackles. Dogs and cats are neutered in order to control the populations and the numbers of unwanted and stray pets. By controlling the numbers of strays, it logically follows that you will reduce the spread of disease, the number of dogs and cats run over on the roads, the number of pets killed by strays, and the number of strays suffering starvation. Spaying and neutering also have the side benefits of a reduction in certain types of cancer, especially in females, the reduction of the tendency to wander in males should they escape, some reduction in aggressive traits in male dogs, etc. There is also the fact that dogs and cats are domestic animals. Venomous snakes are not.
Producing venomoid snakes has been compared to declawing cats, removing canine teeth potentially dangerous pets(such as Lions, Pumas, Tigers, monkeys, etc.), docking of tails, ears, etc. That is, it's surgically altering the animal purely for the convenience or pleasure of the owner and provides no real benefit for the animal. It is purely designed to provide persons who desire to keep venomous animals but are afraid of them an opportunity to keep them in safety.
Therein lies the rub. There is one camp that is bitterly opposed to the idea of surgically altering an animal purely for the convenience of the owner. There is the other camp that sees nothing wrong with the practice.
In this forum it seems they meet and clash.