Reptile & Amphibian Forums

Welcome to kingsnake.com's message board system. Here you may share and discuss information with others about your favorite reptile and amphibian related topics such as care and feeding, caging requirements, permits and licenses, and more. Launched in 1997, the kingsnake.com message board system is one of the oldest and largest systems on the internet.

Click for 65% off Shipping with Reptiles 2 You
https://www.crepnw.com/
Click here for Dragon Serpents

OK morph guys, Settle an arguement about CO-DOMINANT traits in colubrids please

Jeff Schofield Jan 21, 2004 09:09 PM

I am of the opinion(through my limited experience)that there are no proven CO-DOM GENES(not traits like pattern)in colubrids like there are in say boas and pythons.My colleague disagrees,siding with anecdotal evidence within his/her own colony.I have HEARD of some before(the HYPO RED MILKS for example)but I have yet to see any proof.IS there any proof out there to be seen? Jeff

Replies (4)

carol Jan 21, 2004 11:45 PM

I would say that Aztec *MAY* be an example of this, but how does one really prove anything? In my limited experience, corn's tendancies to break the rules is the very factor that contributes to all the morphs we do have. I have seen some striping come up in animals that do not carry the existing "stripe gene", this trait almost seems to be co-dominant, but I have not been working with them long enough to "prove" anything. I am sure there are Co-Dominant genes out there, but we haven't even broken the tip of the iceberg when it comes to fully understanding the existing morphs.
I would almost stick my neck out and say that stripe and motley are co-dominant, but motley seems to be just a little stronger. However, does co-dominant mean that both genes have an equal effect on each other, or does it just mean that they have some sort of effect on each other? LOL... I know it's a crappy answer.

carol Jan 22, 2004 12:23 AM

by saying co-dominant do you mean the traits do not mix at all but inherit either one or the other dominantly?

Jeff Schofield Jan 22, 2004 12:42 AM

Heretability and morphs are alike but not exact.Jeff

Paul Hollander Jan 22, 2004 01:27 PM

>I am of the opinion(through my limited experience)that there are no proven CO-DOM GENES(not traits like pattern)in colubrids like there are in say boas and pythons.

As far as I know, present concensus is that a mutant gene causes the corn snake's motley pattern. I'd be interested in any information to the contrary.

Are you interested in dominant mutant genes or just codominant mutants?

Xanthic in the black rat snake is recessive to the normal allele. Tyrosinase positive albino in the black rat snake is recessive to the normal allele. When a xanthic BRS is mated to a tyrosinase positive albino BRS, the babies are more or less intermediate between a xanthic and a tyrosinase positive albino. That would seem to be a codominant relationship. See Bern Bechtel's paper in the Journal of Heredity, sometime in 1985.

Richard Zweifel had a paper in the Journal of Heredity sometime in 1982, if I remember correctly. He showed that striped in California king snakes was dominant to normal (banded), though the heterozygote is pretty variable. And striped in San Diego gopher snakes seems to be either dominant or codominant to normal pattern. I think Bechtel was the author of the paper, but I'd have to look up the citation.

I would certainly agree that MOST mutant genes in colubrids are recessives. But more dominants and codominants will probably turn up in the future.

Paul Hollander

Site Tools