There is a lot to your post that just doesn't seem to add up:
>And more than likely never will be.Every possible scenario has >a flaw or two and this is no exception.Buying anything het is a >serious chance at getting nothing but "het" for normals.
Which is why Hets are so much cheaper. The market is what sustains the price on anything, so $250 is what the RISK of a failed "het" is worth on a Male het for albino. So I agree with you to this point.
>Genetics paperwork written up and copied about the animal is >about 50% accurate.This can be tampered with and is NOT a guaranteed way of getting anything.
72% of all statistics given on the spot are completely made up (snoodge!)...The paperwork is really only as good as the letterhead on it. If that letterhead says "VPI" it is worth a bit more to me than if it says "Joe Schmoe's snake of the month club". As with any other warranty, it is only as good as the person backing it.
>Buying from reputable breeders as everyone here states also is >about 60% accurate,They too can be dishonest if needbe for the >quick buck.
Where do you get 60% from? Did you buy 100 hets from reputable reptile breeders and only got 60 truly het animals? I'd say your chances are better with reptile breeders because THEY HAVE MORE TO LOSE IF THEY DEVELOP A BAD REPUTATION! Little Billy trying to make a buck after school can give a rat's you-know-what if people don't trust him. Bob Clark, on the other hand, might have EVERYTHING to lose! Most of the reputable breeders have worked quite hard to get that way, and aren't likely to take it very lightly if that could be tarnished.
>Taking pics of the animal for sale isnt accurate at all.Alot of >snakes will change color,pattern,etc as they grow so taking a >pic of say a baby b/p het for albino isnt going to look the >same as when it gets to breeding age.
Color, yes definitely. Pattern?????? Are you dipping your snakes in bleach or something? Kool-aid? Except for the changing of colors, I have yet to see the pattern of my snakes change except to grow in proportion to the snake itself.
>Someone mentioned about using microchips for the purpase of >keeping track of the animal in ?,That could get very expensive >in the long run and to me wouldnt be worth the time and effort >to do so. Lets say you have 1,000 baby b/ps and you want to >microchip about half of that.
1,000 hets?!! Wow, do any of the big breeders ever have this problem? I think that's an awful lot, even for a SnakeKeeper, VPI, Bob Clark, etc.
>500 b/ps at $60 bucks a pop is alot of wasted money.
I've heard thirty bucks pop, but I'll go with your figures: $30,000: About the price of a good Super Pastel. Perhaps the improved reputation that would result from this practice is worth it. To be honest, I'd pay $30 - $60 extra for a microchip, depending on the animal.
>Out of those 500 you sell 200 to the genral public.
Why would you need to microchip something you aren't selling? I don't get it.
>That leaves you with 300 b/ps to either keep as pets,sell as a >whole,or keep for future breeders.
Then I wouldn't microchip them. If I'm hatching 1,000 ball python morph hets a year, I trust that the people I have helping me care for them will be able to organize things in a proper way to make microchipping them unnecessary.
>Now as the ones you sold to the genral public begin to >grow,some will make it others wont.So out of the 200 sold to >the genral public about 150 of those survive to make it to >adulthood.50 b/ps have died along the way and 300 dollars has >been shot down for microchipping.
I always though you microchipped animals after a few months, not right at birth. It would seem like a pretty stressful procedure to undertake on a hatchling. Besides, I'm sure breeders would have thought of this. I wouldn't chip a snake that I didn't have pretty good reason to believe was going to survive.
>All that is just hypothetical just imagine if it was say 5000 >then the amount of money you would lose compared to saving is >going to outway,Still want to do the microchip theory.
Too bad the reasoning that got you to this point had more holes than Swiss Cheese. The more animals you have, the lower your cost will be. And you can take THAT to the bank!
>Basically what all this means is there is no guaranteed way of >getting exactly what you are expecting.Its just like >gambling.You throw the dice and out of 5 throws you have at >least 2 chances of crapping out.
Except it isn't like gambling at all. If anything, it's like the stock market. The higher the potential gain, the higher the potential risk. If you trust the person who is selling it to you, then go for it. If you got screwed, then your judgment was skewed and a new lesson is learned. I agree with the guy who said that if you don't want to take the risk, then just buy the visible morph itself. Of course it's more expensive, but don't play the game if you are afraid of it.
I don't know, it's pretty obvious. The low price reflects a great many things: the seemingly much higher availability of hets in relation to actual morph animals, the fact that you have to do all the work to get that morph, and the risk you are taking that it might not get it for you. If you want to pay $2,000 - $3500 for an albino, great! Get it. If not, you can get a het-albino for between $200 and $800. If all the risk and such isn't worth $200 - $800 to you, then don't get one. Enough said!