Reptile & Amphibian Forums

Welcome to kingsnake.com's message board system. Here you may share and discuss information with others about your favorite reptile and amphibian related topics such as care and feeding, caging requirements, permits and licenses, and more. Launched in 1997, the kingsnake.com message board system is one of the oldest and largest systems on the internet.

Click here to visit Classifieds
Click here to visit Classifieds

Interesting article..........

herpconsultants2 Feb 07, 2004 09:01 AM

Molecular genetic evidence for parthenogenesis in the Burmese python, Python molurus bivittatus

T V M Groot, E Bruins and J A J Breeuwer

Abstract

Parthenogenesis among reptiles is rare. Only a few species have the ability to reproduce asexually. Most of these are obligate parthenogenetic species that consist (almost) entirely of females, which can reproduce solely through parthenogenesis. Rarer are sexual species that only sporadically reproduce through parthenogenesis. A female Python molurus bivittatus (Reptilia, Boidae) from the Artis Zoo, Amsterdam, produced eggs in five consecutive years that contained embryos while she was isolated from males. These eggs might be fertilized with stored sperm, or might be the product of parthenogenesis. Parthenogenesis has not been shown for the Boidae family before. We performed parentship analyses on the snake and seven of her embryos using microsatellites and AFLP. Four microsatellite loci developed for this species combined with three loci developed previously for different snake species revealed too little variation to discriminate between sperm retention and parthenogenesis. With AFLP we were able to confirm that the Artis Zoo female reproduced parthenogenetically. Because the offspring are genetically identical to their mother, whereas in previous studies on sporadic parthenogenesis in snakes a loss of genetic information was reported, we conclude that the meiotic pathways that produce the diploid egg cells are different.

Heredity (2003) 90, 130-135

Replies (5)

BrianSmith Feb 07, 2004 02:39 PM

>>Molecular genetic evidence for parthenogenesis in the Burmese python, Python molurus bivittatus
>>
>>T V M Groot, E Bruins and J A J Breeuwer
>>
>>
>>Abstract
>>
>>
>>Parthenogenesis among reptiles is rare. Only a few species have the ability to reproduce asexually. Most of these are obligate parthenogenetic species that consist (almost) entirely of females, which can reproduce solely through parthenogenesis. Rarer are sexual species that only sporadically reproduce through parthenogenesis. A female Python molurus bivittatus (Reptilia, Boidae) from the Artis Zoo, Amsterdam, produced eggs in five consecutive years that contained embryos while she was isolated from males. These eggs might be fertilized with stored sperm, or might be the product of parthenogenesis. Parthenogenesis has not been shown for the Boidae family before. We performed parentship analyses on the snake and seven of her embryos using microsatellites and AFLP. Four microsatellite loci developed for this species combined with three loci developed previously for different snake species revealed too little variation to discriminate between sperm retention and parthenogenesis. With AFLP we were able to confirm that the Artis Zoo female reproduced parthenogenetically. Because the offspring are genetically identical to their mother, whereas in previous studies on sporadic parthenogenesis in snakes a loss of genetic information was reported, we conclude that the meiotic pathways that produce the diploid egg cells are different.
>>
>>Heredity (2003) 90, 130-135
-----
"If I had 365 enemies it would only take a year out of my life to settle all scores. Heck, much less if some live in the same states as others" Mia Myselfani

"All deeds be they good or bad shall be repaid one hundred fold." Yers Troolie

dannygood1 Feb 07, 2004 07:46 PM

n/p

JDP Feb 08, 2004 10:17 AM

Im still certain its just stored sperm. The only true way to tell would be for a burm to produce eggs while never having been with a male before. I bet there arent any instances of that.

BrianSmith Feb 08, 2004 03:31 PM

,... couldn't a simple DNA test on the offspring prove or disprove one way or the other? I mean, couldn't it show that say, 30 out of 30 babies have only the mother's DNA? Because if there was stored sperm from a male in the past then the DNA of the offspring would show the male's DNA too. Right?

>>Im still certain its just stored sperm. The only true way to tell would be for a burm to produce eggs while never having been with a male before. I bet there arent any instances of that.
-----
"Sure,... you say that now. But what will you say when you are looking into my dark, merciless eyes." [Walter Wego]

"Charlie won because we never knew where he was. We had superior numbers, but he had stealth, patience, and sheer determination to prevail. We lost the moment we decided to engage, only it took us 10 years to lie down and die." [General Enevi Tability on the Vietnam war]

JDP Feb 08, 2004 07:03 PM

I would imagine so. Im ignorant of the DNA stuff so I dont know if it would work.

Site Tools