>>What power magnification do you need to actually see the sperm?
i think i use the 10x element: that plus the 10x eyepiece means i'm looking at 100x magnification. I prefer a scope with an electric light source; cheaper devices with a mirror to reflect ambient light SHOULD work, but i've not been able to make them produce a meaningful image. The trickiest part is getting the light/contrast adjusted correctly, the sperm are pretty small organisms and it's easy to light too brightly and not even see them; adjust the light and i guess it's the direction of light, and suddenly they come into view.
>>Does anyone have any pictures of what good snake sperm should look like?
I don't, but i've bought a microscope that hooks to my computer to capture images, and hope to have some to post here in 6 weeks or so.
> Are you taking a count? Or are you looking for shape and structure?
well, i'm taking a count only in the most general sense. I'm not counting, but just looking for extremely densely populated samples. and i'm watching for normal mobility, that they're swimming smoothly and quickly. toward the end of the season especially you start seeing some that are kinked, and moving spastically rather than swimming smoothly. those are presumed to be faulty.
i know of one instance in which a fella reported a 10-month old male i'd sold him was putting out good sperm. He was knowledgeable so i assume he knew what he was seeing. But i recall he got only one or two babies out of around 40 eggs. So there may be/probably are additional indicators we lay persons can't distinguish under a scope.
i hope that helps.
terry dunham
albino tricolors
st pete florida
>>
>>Thanks