Reptile & Amphibian Forums

Welcome to kingsnake.com's message board system. Here you may share and discuss information with others about your favorite reptile and amphibian related topics such as care and feeding, caging requirements, permits and licenses, and more. Launched in 1997, the kingsnake.com message board system is one of the oldest and largest systems on the internet.

Click here to visit Classifieds
https://www.crepnw.com/

Minnesota alert

EricWI Feb 19, 2004 04:49 PM

Even though this news article doesn't specicically mention reptiles, I thought we should know about this.

MINNESOTA SENATE: Proposal takes aim at exotic pets

BY TAMMY J. OSEID

Pioneer Press

Lions, monkeys and bears would be banned as pets in Minnesota under a bill that cleared its first hurdle Wednesday.

A Senate committee approved a proposal intended to keep Minnesotans from buying new big cats, primates and bears as pets or breeding those they already have. The move came just weeks after four tigers and a camel were found dead on a private farm near Pelican Rapids. Several tiger maulings have been reported across the nation.

In the face of opposition from owners of petting zoos and exotic-animal shows, senators on the Agriculture, Veterans and Gaming Committee amended the bill to largely exempt them from many restrictions. Major zoos — such as the Como and Minnesota zoos — as well as wildlife sanctuaries and game farms were exempt already.

"We see this as basic common-sense public safety," said Olmsted County Sheriff Steve Borchardt. He serves as executive director of the Minnesota Sheriff's Association, which supports the bill, along with the Minnesota Animal Control Association and the Minnesota Zoo. "When you're a sheriff, you worry about these things."

Some 15,000 big cats are believed to be kept as pets nationally. Hundreds of Internet sites offer big cats, monkeys and other exotic animals for sale. Others give advice on capturing animals in the wild.

In 2003, captive big cats injured more people nationally than ever before, according to the Captive Wild Animal Protection Coalition. Three people died and at least 14 were injured, including the high-profile maulings of entertainer Roy Horn and the man who raised a 600-pound Bengal tiger in his Harlem apartment. In 2004, one person has died and two have been injured.

Bemidji fourth-grader Dale Davy, who helped raise a lion cub owned by the Paul Bunyan Animal Land in Bemidji for his science fair project, was among those who persuaded the senators to allow exotic-animal business owners more leeway.

"We want to do just as much as you to protect the public safety," said Animal Land owner Caara Holmstrom told the committee. "But not if it means going out of business."

It's residents like the one who kept a bear named Thor in a renovated pool and took him for walks in city parks that trouble Bill Forbes, a Bloomington animal control officer and a representative of the Minnesota Animal Control Association.

The city — like many suburbs — passed an ordinance prohibiting exotic animals. Later, they heard the bear had injured someone in its new home in Kandiyohi County.

"We ran the bear out of town, but we didn't stop it from affecting public safety," Forbes said.

Now Forbes hopes the Legislature will regulate what his city couldn't control beyond its borders.

Details will be worked out before the bill moves to the Senate Judiciary Committee next month.

Replies (4)

chris_mcmartin Feb 19, 2004 06:52 PM

Anytime I see a news article or TV news story which quotes some obscure organization (in this case, the Captive Wild Animal Protection Coalition), I have to check out the organization, at least a little bit.

I'm not sure if it's an arm of PeTA or not, but on their site (in the FAQ), they have this information as to what constitutes a wild or exotic animal (emphasis added):

"In terms of the trade in exotic and wild animals for pets, the species of greatest concern are: lions, tigers, leopards, cheetahs, cougars, wolves, bears, reptiles, non-human primates, and some birds; all of which are considered dangerous animals and belong in their natural habitat and not in the hands of private individuals. These animals are wild, potentially dangerous and do not make appropriate pets."

Just think--that anole could be plotting your death right now!

-----
Chris McMartin
www.mcmartinville.com
I'm Not a Herpetologist, but I Play One on the Internet

EricWI Feb 20, 2004 04:28 PM

I periodically check Google's news search feature under "exotic pets" or "exotic animals" for news on such proposals.
I truly hate seeing these absurd ordinances go into play. I think most cities pass them just out of fear and misconception.

bryan self Feb 20, 2004 05:24 PM

I would say they are part of PETA and the HSUS. If you look at the sponsers page both are listed. And I think we all know what the agenda is there.
-----
Bryan Self
Quetzalcoatl Reptiles

EricWI Mar 09, 2004 09:39 AM

The bill has passed the first House commitee, but there is still plenty of time for hearings. It has also been modified so that exotic pet owners must register with the US Dept. of Agriculture or the state board of animal health.

Site Tools