I've read through this entire conversation and have formulated my opinion on it all in one place rather than replying to various posts here and there. It is simply easier.
Many people do believe that panacur is a cure all. It is probably one of the easiest medications to get a hold of without the need for a verterinarian's prescription. We all know that horse wormer paste can be bought over the counter - hence the popularity for people asking about it. Of course at the dosages that the paste comes in it is all too easy to wind up killing your animal as it is to help it if you don't know exactly what you are doing with it in relation to an animal that is not a horse.
No melissa is not a veterinarian and neither does she claim to be one. She also DOES NOT say or claim that panacur cures everything despite the general claim made in another post.
The information on Melissa's page shows that panacur will take care of many (not all) types of nematodes ie worms. However, she does not claim that it cures tape worms or bacterial infections or coccidia or flagellate protozoans.
She also cautions people about trying to treat their animals on their own rather than going to a veterinarian. My belief is that if someone is going to go to great lengths to avoid going to a vet (cost, time, whatever) and do something stupid like try to play doctor on their own without consulting a vet first then they generally get what they deserve.
Perhaps it would be wise before people choose to slam someone they should take the time to know what it is they are supposedly slamming about that person's website. It is also a good idea for other folks to actually go to the page in question that is being attacked and read it for thesmelves before replying to comments made by others. People tend to not always look so hot when they help slam a person (even unitentionally) because they are simply basing their replies on information that someone else has claimed "she/he said this/that" rather than on what they have actually read there.
Slamming "bad" information is one thing. Slamming a person for no good reason and trying to justify that "bad information" is the reason when it in fact is not is an altogether different matter. This is not a case about inaccurate care sheets that might be found elsewhere on the site. This is about the direct claims being made against Melissa in reference to the validity of the information on this page:
http://www.anapsid.org/resources/rxdose.html
Where does Melissa say that panacur cures everything? I don't see it. What I see is a page where she has compiled a respectable chart of information about drug dosages for various health related problems in reptiles that was taken from books written by well known well respected reptile veterinarians and she very clearly states where that information was comiled from:
Unless otherwise noted, the doses below are from Mader (1996) and Frye (1993).
Are the people on this forum implying that Mader and Frye (and other veterinarians) are quacks who don't know their stuff? Or are people using that compiled information as an excuse to justify bashing away at someone just because *some* people here and elsewhere don't happen to like Melissa for whatever reason?