Wow.
I know I'm a lil' late in this, but I can't help but say something.
IMO-----
The post that started all of this, while lacking in tact to a degree, was correct. It doesn't matter whether you're deaf, blind, or a quadruple amputee, certain truths always apply. For instance, a website (or any other advertising medium) that is professional in appearance is more appealing than one that is not. Bad grammar and misspelling falls into the latter category. First impressions are like that. I'm not slamming on the guy's website, I think it looks nice. Is it a shame that a website with that much work into it can be weakened by a lack of proofreading? Absolutely!
Noone would care about my opinion anyway, but in a nutshell, here it is-
Christina was slightly lacking in decorum with her original post, but meant well.
Christina's point was accurate.
She apologized.
No matter the situation of the company (or persons), a well written website is preferable to one with mistakes.
Lay off the Christina chick.
Ignore this, or flame away
J