Is the OBK really more rare than a true AK? My first total fascination with kings was with "goini." The stuff I saw dead or alive in Tallahassee and surrounding areas was awesome, as Sean now knows all too well.
The true blotched, or "goini" from the best I can tell is considered extinct - that is, the one that is totally patternless and was thought to be a relict of when the Gulf of Mexico was much further out to sea than it is today. So the currunt true AK are crosses between that species and a L.g.g., and then of course the natural backcrosses, etc.
I may be off on this theory, so if someone has read otherwise, I'd love to hear it, really, because I'm not sure I totally understand the biogeography and genetics of this snake.
But as far as I'm concerned the most beautiful king by a long shot is a 5' totally patternless, light copper-colored AK - and Keith, locale snakes of that pattern are damm hard to find; at least from people you can rely on to provide you with accurate data.
To me, that's the rarest, and most beautiful king there is.
I agree though that OBK should fetch a better price than they do because nice specimens are gorgeous snakes, plain and simple. One problem I've found is that I've got a nice female who can breed with ease next season. I don't want to breed OBK so why keep her? But at the same time I've got to sell her to someone who will keep the line clean (this is Howie Shermans "Striker" stock) and not cross it with some north Florida Eastern. So it's kinda a "What do I do situation?" But I won't sell her to just anybody, that's for sure - I respect the uniqueness of them and don't want people mucking up this lineage.
Finding a nice AK will be a goal of mine - a serious one - when I move back to Tallahassee.
Peace.
-John